News
 
Varghese Summersett

Divorce can be a very complex, emotional process. In Texas, divorces generally fall into two categories: fault-based and no-fault. If you’re considering divorce in Texas, it’s crucial to understand these two different categories before filing.

Grounds for Divorce: Fault vs. No-Fault

Generally, in Texas, divorces fall into either fault or no-fault categories. However, the bases of these groups fall into separate subcategories, as explained below.]

Fault Based Grounds for divorce

Fault-Based Grounds for Divorce

Fault-based divorces occur when one spouse is responsible for the marriage breakdown due to specific actions. In Texas, the following are recognized fault grounds:

  • Cruelty : Occurs when one spouse has participated in cruel treatment towards the other.
  • Adultery : Occurs when one spouse has been unfaithful by means of sexual intercourse to the other, causing a breakdown in the marriage.
  • Conviction of a Felony: Occurs when a spouse has been convicted and imprisoned for at least one year.
  • Abandonment: Occurs when one spouse has left the other without any intention of returning.
  • Living Apart: Occurs when spouses have been living apart without cohabitation for at least 3 years.
  • Confinement in a Mental Hospital: Occurs when a spouse has been confined in a mental hospital for at least three years with little chance of recovery.

No Fault Grounds for DivorceNo-Fault Grounds for Divorce

No-fault divorce is the more common route in Texas. This means that you don’t have to prove any wrongdoing by your spouse. You simply need to show that the marriage has irretrievably broken down.

In some other states, a no-fault divorce is commonly referred to as being a divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable differences, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, or incompatibility. Texas law currently allows for a no-fault divorce on the basis of insupportability. This means that the marriage has become insupportable due to discord or conflict, and there is no reasonable expectation of reconciliation.

What’s the Difference between Fault and No-Fault Divorce?

The primary distinction between fault and no-fault divorce lies in the burden of proof and potential impact on the divorce settlement. In fault-based divorces, it is necessary to prove another’s misconduct and the process can be time-consuming and emotionally draining. A fault-based divorce may also affect property division.

In comparison, a no-fault divorce does not require either party to prove wrongdoing. This process is often quicker, less contentious, and may be less expensive in the long run.

What is the Appeal of a No-Fault Divorce?

Many couples opt for a no-fault divorce for several compelling reasons:

  • Privacy: It keeps personal, private matters out of public court records.
  • Reduced Conflict: It can help maintain a more amicable relationship, especially important when children are involved because it minimizes the “blame game” between the parties.
  • Cost-Effective: With less to prove in court, legal fees are often lower than the legal fees necessary to prove fault.
  • Faster Resolution: No-fault divorces typically move through the system more quickly.

When May a Fault-Based Divorce More Appropriate?

While no-fault divorce is popular, there are situations where pursuing a fault-based divorce could be a more appropriate avenue:

  • Cases of Domestic Violence: Proving cruelty can help secure protective orders.
  • Financial Misconduct: If a spouse has wasted marital assets, proving fault might lead to unequal division of property.
  • Custody Battles: In severe cases, proving fault could influence child custody decisions.

Remember, every situation is unique and may not always be straightforward. It’s crucial to consult with an experienced family law attorney to determine the best approach for your specific circumstances.

If you’re facing a divorce and are unsure whether a fault-based or no-fault approach is best for you, don’t hesitate to seek professional legal advice. The experienced attorneys at Varghese Summersett are here to guide you through every step of the process. Contact us today at 817-203-2220 to schedule a consultation and get the support you need.

marriage is difficult

Varghese Summersett

The Fall of an Empire: What Did Diddy Do?

On September 16, 2023, the music and entertainment world was rocked by the arrest of Sean “Diddy” Combs, one of the most influential and wealthy figures in hip-hop history. The following day, federal prosecutors unsealed a bombshell indictment charging Combs with racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution.

The charges stem from alleged criminal activities dating back to 2009 and paint a disturbing picture of abuse, exploitation, and intimidation behind the glossy facade of Combs’ business empire.

In this article, we will look at the indictment to see what the prosecutor’s answer is to “What did Diddy do?” We’ll use Diddy’s arrest and denial of bail (twice) as an opportunity to discuss criminal prosecution in the federal system.

Sean “Diddy” Combs Indictment

The Diddy Indictment Explained

diddys criminal charges

The indictment accuses Sean “Diddy” Combs of running his business empire as a criminal enterprise to facilitate sex trafficking and other illegal activities. Here’s a breakdown of the charges:

1. Racketeering Conspiracy

What it means:

Prosecutors allege that Combs and his associates operated as an organized criminal group called the “Combs Enterprise” to commit various crimes over many years.

Key elements:

  • Existence of an enterprise affecting interstate commerce
  • Combs was associated with or employed by the enterprise
  • Combs agreed to participate in the enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity
  • Combs agreed that someone would commit at least two acts of racketeering activity

Alleged criminal activities:

  • Sex trafficking
  • Forced labor
  • Kidnapping
  • Arson
  • Bribery
  • Drug distribution

2. Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud, or Coercion

What it means:

Combs is accused of forcing or tricking people into performing commercial sex acts.

Key elements:

  • Recruiting, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing, obtaining, or maintaining a person for commercial sex acts
  • Using force, threats, fraud, or coercion
  • Acts occurred across state lines or internationally

Specific allegations:

From 2009 to 2018, Combs allegedly victimized at least one person (referred to as “Victim-1”) through these means.

3. Transportation to Engage in Prostitution

What it means:

Combs is accused of moving people across state or national borders for the purpose of prostitution.

Key elements:

  • Knowingly transporting individuals across borders
  • Intending for those individuals to engage in prostitution

Timeframe:

The indictment alleges this occurred from 2009 to 2024.

  • The indictment includes forfeiture allegations, meaning Diddy could lose property and money related to these crimes if convicted.

Learn about our top-rated federal criminal defense team.

bases for diddy's charges

The Factual Bases for Diddy’s Charges

The indictment lays out a years-long pattern of alleged criminal conduct by Combs and his associates. Some key points from the factual basis include:

  • Combs allegedly used his various businesses – including Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and Combs Global – to facilitate and cover up criminal activities.
  • The indictment describes “Freak Offs” – lavish sex parties that Combs allegedly organized, directed, and recorded. These events allegedly involved transporting sex workers across state and international borders.
  • Combs is accused of distributing drugs to victims and using violence and intimidation to control them.
  • The indictment details specific incidents of alleged physical abuse, including a 2016 incident at a Los Angeles hotel where Combs allegedly kicked, dragged, and threw a vase at a woman who was trying to leave.
  • Prosecutors allege that Combs used his wealth and influence to silence victims and obstruct investigations into his conduct.

The Investigation

The case against Combs is the result of a lengthy investigation by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and other law enforcement agencies. Some key points about the investigation include:

  • Federal agents conducted searches of Combs’ homes in Miami and Los Angeles, seizing evidence including drugs and what they termed “Freak Off supplies” – over 1,000 bottles of lubricant and baby oil.
  • The investigation appears to have been building for years, compiling evidence from multiple alleged victims and witnesses.
  • The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which has a reputation for handling high-profile organized crime and racketeering cases.
  • While the criminal charges are new, they appear to be at least partially built on allegations made in several civil lawsuits filed against Combs in recent years.

who are diddy's victims

Who Might the Victims Be?

While the names of victims are not public, there are a number of related civil and criminal cases that give us an idea of who these indictments might be based on.

Forced Sexual Activity

Cassie Ventura, a former partner and singer who filed a lawsuit in 2023 alleging years of abuse, trafficking, and rape.

Testimony: Ventura could testify about being forced into recorded sexual activity referred to as “Freak Outs” and detail the pattern of abuse that began as soon as their relationship started, including being raped in 2018 when she tried to end the relationship.

Criminal Enterprise

Rodney “Lil Rod” Jones, a producer who worked for Combs and alleged he was subjected to unwanted advances, drugged, and threatened.

Testimony: Jones could describe how Combs used his business empire to coerce and control victims, including hosting “sex-trafficking parties” with underage women and illegal drugs.

Sex Trafficking:

Jane Doe (pseudonym), who filed a lawsuit alleging she was drugged and gang-raped by Combs and his associates in 2003.

Testimony: Jane Doe could detail how she was flown from Michigan to New York, plied with drugs and alcohol, and then raped, which aligns with the indictment’s allegations of sex trafficking.

Forced Labor:

Victim: Dawn Richard, a former bandmate who accused Combs of years of physical and sexual abuse, including withholding payment for work on albums.

Testimony: Richard could testify about how Combs manipulated her with promises of career advancement, subjected her to physical and sexual abuse, and withheld basic necessities during recording sessions.

Kidnapping and Assault:

Victim: April Lampros, who alleged Combs sexually assaulted her multiple times between 1995 and the early 2000s.

Testimony: Lampros could describe how Combs forced himself on her despite her protests, including an incident where she was physically forced to perform oral sex in a garage near his apartment.

What Punishment Does Diddy Face if Convicted?

If convicted, Combs is facing the following consequences:

  • For the racketeering conspiracy charge: Up to 20 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and forfeiture of any money or property gained through the illegal activities.
  • For the sex trafficking charge: Up to life in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and mandatory restitution to the victims.
  • For the transportation for prostitution charge: Up to 10 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and restitution to victims.

Given the multiple charges and the allegations of ongoing criminal activity, if convicted on all counts Combs could potentially face life in prison.

Legal Proceedings So Far

Since his arrest, there have been several key developments in the legal proceedings against Combs:

Why was Diddy’s Bond Denied Twice?

It may seem highly unusual for a defendant of Combs’ wealth and status to be denied bail. Yet, Combs has been denied bail twice and remains in custody as his case proceeds.

The Federal Bail Process

To understand why Combs remains in custody despite his immense wealth, it’s important to note how federal bail differs from the cash bail system used in many state courts:

  • Federal courts use the Bail Reform Act of 1984, which focuses on assessing flight risk and danger to the community rather than a defendant’s ability to pay.
  • Instead of requiring upfront payment, federal defendants are typically released on a bond – essentially a promise to pay if they fail to appear for trial.
  • Prosecutors must show
    • by a preponderance of evidence (more than 50% likely) that a defendant is a flight risk, or
    • by clear and convincing evidence that they pose a danger to others.
  • Factors considered include the nature of the charges, the strength of the evidence, the defendant’s ties to the community, criminal history, and any history of failing to appear in court.

In Combs’ case, his wealth and private jet access actually worked against him in terms of flight risk. The allegations of witness intimidation were likely a major factor in the danger assessment.

During bail hearings, prosecutors argued that Combs posed both a flight risk and a danger to witnesses if released.

Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky, who made the initial decision to deny bail, cited several factors:

  • Evidence of violence against women
  • Combs’ access to weapons
  • A history of anger management and substance abuse issues
  • Allegations that Combs had already contacted potential witnesses, who reported being afraid of him

Judge Tarnofsky noted the serious nature of the charges, stating, “This is a crime that happens behind closed doors, even when pretrial services is monitoring” a defendant on bail.

Witness Tampering Allegations

One of the most damaging allegations against Combs in terms of pretrial detention is that he attempted to contact and intimidate potential witnesses after learning of the investigation. Prosecutors cited a specific example:

  • Combs allegedly called or texted Kalenna Harper, a former protégée, 58 times over just four days after another woman, Dawn Richard, filed a lawsuit accusing him of physical and sexual abuse.

This alleged pattern of witness tampering has been cited as evidence of both obstruction of justice and the ongoing danger Combs might pose if released.

The Broader Context: Combs’ Rise and Fall

To fully grasp the significance of these charges, it’s crucial to understand Sean Combs’ place in the music industry and popular culture:

The Rise of “Puff Daddy”

Sean Combs, also known by stage names including “Puff Daddy,” “P. Diddy,” and simply “Diddy,” built a hip-hop empire starting in the 1990s. After working as an intern at Uptown Records, he founded Bad Boy Entertainment in 1993. The label would go on to launch the careers of artists like The Notorious B.I.G., Mary J. Blige, and many others.

Combs became known not just for his music, but for his flamboyant lifestyle and business acumen. He expanded into fashion with his Sean John clothing line, vodka with Cîroc, and various other ventures. By blending street credibility with luxury branding, Combs became one of the wealthiest figures in hip-hop, with a net worth estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

Controversies and Legal Issues

While immensely successful, Combs’ career has also been marked by controversies and legal troubles:

  • In 1999, he was arrested in connection with a shooting at a New York nightclub. While acquitted of gun possession and bribery charges, his protégé Shyne was convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
  • Combs has faced multiple lawsuits alleging physical abuse, including a high-profile case brought by his former girlfriend, singer Cassie Ventura, in 2023. That case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.
  • There have been persistent rumors and allegations of exploitative business practices throughout Combs’ career, with some former artists claiming they were underpaid or mistreated.

Reactions from the Entertainment World

The charges against Combs have sent shockwaves through the music industry, with various celebrities and industry figures weighing in:

  • 50 Cent, a long-time rival of Combs, posted on social media, “I told you, Puffy was in trouble.” While seemingly gloating, 50 Cent’s comments reflect the long-standing rumors and allegations that have swirled around Combs for years.
  • Aubrey O’Day, a former member of the group Danity Kane which was signed to Combs’ Bad Boy Records, expressed support for the alleged victims, stating, “I believe the women.” O’Day has previously spoken out about negative experiences working with Combs.
  • Kesha, who has faced her own high-profile legal battle over abuse allegations in the music industry, shared a message of solidarity, saying, “I stand with the survivors.”
  • Many of Combs’ long-time collaborators and friends, including Mary J. Blige, have remained notably silent on the charges, perhaps reflecting the complex loyalties and power dynamics at play in the industry.

The Path Forward: What Comes Next

As the case against Sean “Diddy” Combs proceeds, there are several key issues and potential outcomes to watch for:

Legal Strategy and Potential Plea Deals

Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and assembled a high-powered legal team to mount his defense. Given the serious nature of the charges and the potential for a life sentence, there will likely be intense negotiations between Combs’ lawyers and prosecutors.

Some possible scenarios include:

  • Combs could maintain his innocence and take the case to trial, betting on his legal team’s ability to cast doubt on the prosecution’s evidence.
  • Prosecutors might offer a plea deal to avoid a lengthy and high-profile trial, potentially in exchange for Combs’ cooperation in other investigations.
  • If the case does go to trial, it could be a lengthy and complex proceeding, potentially lasting months and involving testimony from numerous alleged victims and witnesses.

The Legacy Question

For Sean Combs personally, the charges threaten to completely redefine his legacy. Once hailed as a visionary entrepreneur who brought hip-hop culture into the mainstream of American business, he now faces the possibility of being remembered primarily for alleged crimes and exploitation.

The case raises difficult questions about how to reconcile an individual’s artistic and business achievements with serious allegations of personal misconduct. It’s a dilemma that has faced many industries in the wake of #MeToo, but rarely with a figure as central to his genre as Combs has been to hip-hop.

Conclusion

For a generation that grew up seeing Combs as the epitome of hip-hop success, the case is a sobering reality check. It underscores the importance of looking beyond the glitz and glamour to critically examine the systems and individuals that shape our popular culture. As the legal process plays out, the music industry – and society at large – will be forced to grapple with difficult questions about power, responsibility, and the true cost of fame.

Learn more from our Fort Worth Criminal Defense Lawyer.

Varghese Summersett

Texas High Court Set for a Delta 8 THC Battle

Texas has struggled with what to do with THC products, especially Delta-8 THC, ever since Texas followed the federal government’s lead when the 2018 Farm Bill Act was passed. The changes in legislation distinguished hemp and marijuana. It defined hemp as cannabis containing no more than 0.3% delta-9 THC, the primary psychoactive compound in marijuana. This change meant that THC that was 1) not specifically delta-9 THC and 2) less than .3% delta-9 THC was not illegal. This opened the door for a variety of products to be sold without limitation, including delta-8 THC, THCA, and substances with less than .3% delta-9 THC . Most of the discussion around the proliferation of these products has centered around delta-8 THC. In this article, we will discuss the take of the Texas Supreme Court on Delta-8 THC.

The Delta-8 Loophole

The Farm Bill focused on delta-9 THC, but left a loophole for other cannabinoids like delta-8 THC. Delta-8 occurs naturally in cannabis in small quantities, but it can also be synthesized from CBD. This synthetic delta-8 produces effects similar to, but generally milder than, delta-9 THC.

As Delta-8 products became popular, they fell into a gray area. Some argued that since delta-8 was derived from legal hemp, it should be legal. Others believed that since it’s psychoactive, it should be regulated like marijuana.

Prosecution Challenges

Prosecutors across the state faced issues dealing with Delta-8 cases. In the beginning, state labs couldn’t distinguish between delta-9 THC and other THC types. Millions were spent on equipment and new testing procedures, but the backlog of cases remained, and testing was expensive. To complicate things further, THC is often found in liquids like vape cartridges, yet the law defines THC concentration by dry weight. Many prosecutors began dropping these cases to avoid the high cost of testing.

Our lawyers are your compass in the storm.

Texas Tried to Nip Delta-8 THC in the Bud

In October 2021, the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) updated its website to classify delta-8 THC as a Schedule I controlled substance, effectively making it illegal in the state.

Civil Lawsuit Begins

A group of hemp businesses, led by Sky Marketing Corp. (doing business as Hometown Hero), sued DSHS, claiming it overstepped its authority by classifying delta-8 as illegal without following the proper procedures.

The Legal Battle

In November 2021, a Travis County court granted a temporary injunction against the delta-8 ban. This decision was upheld in September 2023 by the Third Court of Appeals. Now, DSHS has appealed to the Texas Supreme Court, which will decide the legal status of delta-8 THC in Texas.

our bench is deep

Key Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court

Standing and Enforcement Authority

One key argument is whether the plaintiffs have the right (standing) to bring the lawsuit. DSHS argues it doesn’t have the authority to enforce criminal penalties, which lies with local law enforcement. The plaintiffs counter that they face civil penalties under the state’s hemp licensing scheme, which DSHS does enforce.

Ultra Vires Actions and Sovereign Immunity

The plaintiffs also argue that DSHS overstepped its authority by classifying delta-8 as illegal without following proper procedures. DSHS, on the other hand, claims its actions were within its authority, and that sovereign immunity protects it from the lawsuit.

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) Violations

The plaintiffs accuse DSHS of violating the APA by failing to follow rule-making procedures when it declared delta-8 illegal on its website. DSHS contends the website update was informational and not subject to APA requirements.

Irreparable Harm and Public Interest

The court must weigh the potential harms to both sides. The plaintiffs argue that banning delta-8 will harm their businesses, while DSHS points to the public health risks of unregulated delta-8 products, including contaminants and negative health effects.

Broader Implications of the Case

The outcome of this case could impact more than just Texas. If DSHS wins, other states might follow Texas’s lead in cracking down on delta-8. If the plaintiffs win, it could create legal precedents that favor hemp businesses nationwide.

The Cannabis Industry Watches Closely

The cannabis industry, including hemp farmers and CBD manufacturers, is closely watching this case. Supporters of delta-8 believe it offers a milder alternative to delta-9 THC, while critics are concerned about the lack of regulation in delta-8 production.

The Road Ahead

The Texas Supreme Court must now navigate complex laws and regulations. Regardless of the outcome, this case highlights the challenges of regulating the rapidly evolving cannabis industry. As new products emerge, lawmakers must find a balance between innovation and public health concerns.

Conclusion

All eyes are on the Texas Supreme Court as it prepares to rule on this contentious issue. The court’s decision could shape cannabis laws in Texas and potentially across the United States for years to come.

Varghese Summersett

Varghese Summersett, one of the largest and fastest-growing criminal defense, personal injury, and family law practices in North Texas, has expanded to Houston with the opening of a fourth location.

The firm, which is headquartered in downtown Fort Worth and has locations in Dallas and Southlake , is now providing comprehensive legal services to clients in Houston, Pasadena, Sugar Land, Pearland, Richmond, and the surrounding areas.

Its newest location in Houston is strategically positioned to serve clients in Harris and Fort Bend counties.

“The decision to expand to the Houston area was a natural one for us,” said Benson Varghese, managing partner of Varghese Summersett. “Our firm has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, and we are committed to serving as much of Texas as possible. When we saw an opportunity to help people in one of the state’s largest cities, we seized it. I’m confident we have the right leader at the helm, and we are excited to build upon our reputation as the firm people turn to when facing life’s greatest challenges.”

Varghese Summersett Expands to Houston

Leading the Houston office is Mike Hanson, a highly accomplished criminal attorney who has been practicing in the area for nearly a decade—as a prosecutor, military lawyer, and now a sought-after defense attorney.

As a Judge Advocate (JAG lawyer) with the U.S. Army Reserves and a former D1 football player for Texas Tech University, Hanson is not afraid to go into battle — whether it’s defending his clients in court or advocating for justice outside of it.

Mike Hanson Head Shot“Joining Varghese Summersett and expanding its reach into Harris and Fort Bend counties is an incredible opportunity,” said Hanson, who serves as Senior Counsel for the firm.  “This is my home, and I care deeply about the people and communities here. The firm’s reputation for excellence and dedication to clients aligns perfectly with my own values as an attorney, a soldier, and most importantly, a father. I think helping people through the lowest points in their lives is one of the most honorable things you can do.”

With the opening of the Houston office, Varghese Summersett is now poised to serve clients across Southeast Texas. The firm’s attorneys are known for their aggressive representation and exceptional outcomes in high-profile criminal cases, complex personal injury matters, and contentious family law disputes.

“Each division of our firm is composed of the brightest minds in the state of Texas, hand-selected for their experience, knowledge, and proven track record,” said Partner Anna Summersett. “They are the best at what they do, and Mike Hanson is no exception. We are thrilled to have him as our senior counsel for the Houston area. He will ensure that every person who walks through our door will receive the highest level of representation and support.”

About Varghese Summersett

Varghese Summersett is a premiere criminal defense, personal injury, and family law practice in Texas dedicated to helping people through life’s greatest challenges. The firm’s roster is full of highly experienced, award-winning attorneys committed to providing exceptional legal services. Varghese Summersett has more than 1100 5-star Google reviews and has been named a fastest-growing company by Inc. 5000. It has also been named a “DFW Favorite,” a “Best Place to Work,” and a “Best Place for Working Parents,” among numerous other accolades. Learn more about Varghese Summersett at versustexas.com.

Varghese Summersett Team Photo

Varghese Summersett

Criminal Charges Stemming from School Shootings in Texas

School shootings are among the most heartbreaking tragedies a community can face, bringing the nation’s attention to the stark contrast between the innocence of the victims and the devastating nature of the crime.

In Texas, school shootings have led to a variety of serious criminal charges, reflecting the gravity of the offenses committed. The legal consequences for such acts can vary, depending on the specific circumstances. Below are the key types of criminal charges that can stem from a school shooting in Texas.

capital murder charges

Capital Murder

Capital murder is the most severe form of homicide in Texas and can result in either the death penalty or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. School shootings often result in capital murder charges due to the severity and nature of the crime. Here are three ways a school shooting can result in capital murder charges:

  • Multiple Victims: Under Texas Penal Code §19.03(a)(7), a person commits capital murder if they kill more than one person during a single event. In the context of a school shooting, where multiple lives are often tragically lost, this charge frequently applies.
  • Victims Under 15: A shooting that results in the death of a child under 15 years old is automatically classified as capital murder under Texas Penal Code §19.03(a)(8). This law previously applied to children under 10, but now extends to older minors.
  • Killing a Peace Officer or Firefighter: If a school shooter intentionally kills a peace officer, such as law enforcement personnel or a school security officer, while they are performing their duties, this also qualifies as capital murder under Texas Penal Code §19.03(a)(1).

Learn more about capital murder .

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon

If a school shooting results in injuries but no fatalities, the shooter may face charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. This charge is applied when a person causes serious bodily injury or uses a firearm during the assault. Even in cases where no one is physically injured, the use of a firearm can still lead to this charge, emphasizing the inherent danger posed by the shooter’s actions.

Learn more about Aggravated Assault in Texas.

Terroristic Threat

Shooting in or near a school could lead to charges of making a terroristic threat, particularly if the act causes fear or disrupts school operations. Under Texas Penal Code §22.07(c) , if a shooter intends to incite widespread fear or interrupt normal school functions, they may be charged with a third-degree felony. This charge can be applied in situations such as:

  • Threatening to commit a school shooting, leading to an evacuation or shutdown.
  • Sending violent threats via social media, email, or phone to incite panic within the school community.
  • Disrupting public services related to school safety, such as emergency response systems or law enforcement procedures.

Learn more about terroristic threat in Texas.

Deadly conduct

Deadly Conduct

A shooter may face charges of deadly conduct if they recklessly engage in behavior that puts others at risk of serious injury or death. Discharging a firearm in the direction of a school building or at individuals, even without causing injury, constitutes deadly conduct under Texas Penal Code §22.05. In the context of a school shooting, this would likely be charged as a felony.

Learn more about deadly conduct in Texas.

Possession of a Firearm in a School Zone

Both Texas state law and federal law generally prohibit the possession of firearms in school zones, with certain exceptions. Under Texas Penal Code §46.03, it is illegal to carry a firearm on school premises or at school-related activities. Additionally, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 prohibits carrying a firearm within 1,000 feet of a school. Violation of these laws can lead to significant penalties, including fines and imprisonment.

Attempted Murder

If the shooter attempts to kill but fails, they can be charged with attempted murder. This charge carries severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences, depending on the intent and the extent of harm caused during the incident.

Injury to a Child

In cases where the victims are minors, the shooter may face additional charges of injury to a child. Under Texas law, causing harm to a person under the age of 14 is a serious felony, further compounding the criminal liability in school shooting cases where young children are injured or killed.

Learn more about injury to a child in Texas.

What Happens in Texas if the School Shooter is a Juvenile?

In Texas, if a school shooter is a juvenile, the legal process and consequences are different compared to adults. Texas law handles juveniles (usually under 17 years old) differently, but serious crimes like school shootings can lead to harsher consequences. Here’s what could happen:

Juvenile Court vs. Adult Court

Juvenile System: Minors accused of crimes are usually handled by the juvenile justice system, which focuses on rehabilitation. This system aims to address issues that led to the crime and provide treatment or counseling.

Certification as an Adult: For serious crimes like school shootings, prosecutors can ask for the juvenile to be tried as an adult. In Texas, this can happen for children as young as 14 if the crime is very serious (like murder). If certified as an adult, they face adult penalties.

Juvenile Sentencing

If the shooter stays in the juvenile system, they could be sent to a Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) facility until they turn 19. For serious crimes, they could face “determinate sentencing,” which means being sentenced for up to 40 years, with the possibility of moving to adult prison at 19.

Penalties if Tried as an Adult

If the juvenile is tried as an adult, they could face the same penalties as an adult, such as:

  • Capital Murder: Life imprisonment without parole (juveniles cannot receive the death penalty).
  • Other Felonies: Long prison sentences for crimes like aggravated assault or possession of a firearm in a school zone.

Learn more about juvenile charges in Texas.

Legal Consequences of School Shootings

The criminal charges stemming from a school shooting in Texas can carry life-altering consequences for the shooter. From capital murder to aggravated assault and beyond, these charges are intended to reflect the severity of the crime and protect the public from future harm. Depending on the specific circumstances, these cases can involve multiple charges, resulting in either life imprisonment or even the death penalty in the most extreme cases.

School shootings are a tragic reminder of the importance of strong security measures and swift legal action to ensure the safety of students and staff. Those who commit these acts face the full weight of Texas law.

Accused of a School Shooting in Texas? Contact Us.

If you or a loved one is facing serious accusations, like involvement in a school shooting, it’s crucial to have an experienced legal team on your side. At Varghese Summersett, we have criminal and juvenile attorneys with extensive experience handling high-stakes cases. We understand the complexity and sensitivity of these situations. Don’t wait—reach out today for a confidential consultation. Call 817-203-2220.

The stakes are high. Hire the best lawyers.

Varghese Summersett

When it comes to divorce, women are statistically more likely to initiate the proceedings and file for divorce first. The reasons behind this trend point to evolving societal roles, shifting expectations, and the pressures women face in modern relationships. In this article, we will explore some of the factors that contribute to women seeking divorce.

How Many Marriages End in Divorce in 2024?

Around 43 percent of first marriages today will end in divorce. While this statistic might seem alarming, it’s important to note that divorce rates have actually been declining slightly in recent years. In comparison, 60 percent of second marriages and 73 percent of third marriages end in divorce.

Common Reasons for Divorce

Most Common Reasons for Divorce in 2024

According to recent data, the most common reasons people file for divorce in 2024 include:

  • Communication Issues: Poor communication remains a leading cause, with many couples struggling to effectively express their needs and concerns. Communication breakdowns are often exacerbated by the fast pace of life and the digital age, where superficial interactions through text messages and social media can replace meaningful, face-to-face conversations. Many couples find themselves unable to express their needs, emotions, and concerns effectively, leading to misunderstandings, resentment, and ultimately, the decision to divorce.
  • Infidelity: Affairs and breaches of trust can destroy the foundation of a marriage. The rise of online platforms and dating apps has made it easier for individuals to engage in affairs, whether emotional or physical. The discovery of an affair often results in a profound breach of trust, causing irreparable damage to the relationship. As a result, many couples see divorce as the only viable option after such a betrayal.
  • Financial Problems: Disagreements over money can lead to significant strain and eventual separation. economic pressures, including rising living costs, student debt, and financial inequality, contribute to increased tension between partners. Disagreements over spending habits, financial priorities, and unequal contributions to household income can lead to persistent conflict. When financial issues become overwhelming, they can push couples toward divorce as they struggle to find common ground.
  • Lack of Intimacy: A decline in emotional and physical connection is also a frequent cause of divorce. The stresses of daily life, including demanding work schedules and the challenges of parenting, can lead to a reduced emotional connection and physical closeness. When intimacy diminishes, couples may feel disconnected, lonely, and unfulfilled, often leading them to consider divorce as a way to seek happiness elsewhere.

In Texas, “insupportability” is the most common ground for divorce . This is essentially a no-fault option, allowing couples to end their marriage without proving wrongdoing by either party. Insupportability , often referred to as irreconcilable differences, acknowledges that the marriage has become unsustainable due to discord or conflict, with no reasonable expectation of reconciliation. This legal framework reflects a growing recognition that sometimes, despite the absence of blame, a marriage simply cannot continue.

Why Women are More Likely to File for Divorce

 

Why Are Women More Likely to File for Divorce?

In heterosexual marriages, women are significantly more likely to initiate divorce than men, with recent studies showing that about 69 percent of divorces are iniatied by women. Several factors may contribute to this pattern:

  • Increased Financial Independence: Women today are more financially independent than ever before. In this way, women are less likely to put up with intolerable behavior due to the financial reliance on their spouse.
  • Greater Awareness and Self-Advocacy: Women are increasingly aware of their rights and more likely to advocate for their own well-being. This self-awareness often translates into taking action when a marriage isn’t working.
  • Relationship Baggage: Women are more likely to take on the emotional burden in relationships by being the primary emotional support system in the family and dealing with partners who struggle to communicate their emotions effectively. Because of this, women may be left feeling alone and unsupported by their partners.
  • Dissatisfaction with Marital Roles: Some marriages may be tainted with external social expectations. Many women have reported being dissatisfied with their relationships due to feeling unsupported by their husbands as they manage careers, caregiving, and other household responsibilities.

It’s worth noting that even though women file for divorce more often, it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re the sole party wanting to end the marriage. Other factors at play include:

  • Management of Household Affairs: Women often manage household affairs, making them more likely to handle divorce paperwork.
  • Securing Custody Arrangements: In cases involving children, women may file first to secure child support or custody arrangements.
  • Having a “Lazy” Spouse: Some men may leave the relationship but refuse to initiate legal proceedings, prompting women to file for divorce.

Why Do These Statistics Matter?

Understanding divorce statistics helps individuals and families prepare for and manage marital challenges. Knowledge of these trends can guide couples in making informed decisions about their relationships and seeking help when needed.

Ready to File for Divorce? Contact Us.

If you’re facing a divorce or need legal guidance, Varghese Summersett is here to help. Our experienced family law attorneys can provide support and advice tailored to your situation. Contact us today at (817) 900-3220 for a consultation. We serve Fort Worth, Dallas, Southlake and other North Texas cities and counties.

 

marriage is difficult

Varghese Summersett

When parents separate, one of the biggest concerns is how to divide parenting time. An arrangement that is quickly becoming more popular is 50/50 custody. However, 50-50 custody is not included in the Texas Family Code, and arranging this type of schedule may be confusing. In this article,  we will explain what 50/50 custody means and how to arrange it in Texas.

Does Texas Recognize 50/50 Custody?

Yes, although it is not outlined in the Texas Family Code, Texas courts may allow 50/50 custody arrangements if it is in the child’s best interest.

Does Joint Custody Mean 50/50 Custody?

Not exactly. “Joint custody” means that both parents share the responsibility for raising their child. This can be split into two types:

  • Joint Legal Custody: Both parents have equal rights to make important decisions about their child’s upbringing, like education and healthcare.
  • Joint Physical Custody: This refers to the physical time the child spends with each parent.

While joint custody often leads to 50/50 arrangements, they are not the same. Joint custody doesn’t always mean the time spent with each parent is exactly equal.

Child Support with 50/50 Custody

Do You Still Have to Pay Child Support if You Share 50-50 Custody?

It is a common misconception that parents don’t have to pay child support if they have a 50/50 schedule. However, even with a 50/50 custody arrangement, child support may still be required. Texas law takes into account the financial needs of the child as well as the income of both parents. Even with a 50/50 arrangement, child support depends on various factors including each parent’s income and expenses.

Standard Possession vs. 50-50 Custody

In Texas, the most common custody arrangement is found in a “Standard Possession Order.” This schedule is outlined in the Texas Family Code and is often used when parents cannot agree on a different arrangement. It typically gives the non-custodial parent possession on the first, third, and fifth weekend of every month, Thursday evenings, and extended time during summer vacations and holidays. Below is the 2024 Standard Possession Calendar.

50/50 Custody in Texas: What You Need to Know

 

 

 

50/50 custody involves an equal split of time which can look different depending on the parents’ schedules and the child’s needs. It is often more balanced than a Standard Possession Order but requires careful planning and communication.

50/50 Custody in Texas: What You Need to Know

What Does a 50/50 Custody Schedule Look Like?

50/50 custody is a rather creative arrangement, and there are several ways to set up this type of schedule. For example, here are two common types of 50/50 schedules:

Every Other Week

One parent has the child for a full week, then the other parent has the child for the next week. Some parents may decide this type of schedule and create an extended version by alternating between two-week periods instead of one.

Sun. Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Sat.
Parent A Parent A Parent A Parent A Parent A Parent A Parent A
Parent B Parent B Parent B Parent B Parent B Parent B Parent B

2-2-3 Schedule

The child spends two days with one parent, two days with the other, and then alternates weekends.

Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Sat. Sun.
Parent A Parent A Parent B Parent B Parent A Parent A Parent A
Parent B Parent B Parent A Parent A Parent B Parent B Parent B

Each schedule can be adjusted to fit the family’s needs, including school schedules and parents’ work commitments.

How Does 50/50 Custody Affect Summer Possession and Holidays?

When it comes to summer possession and holidays, 50/50 custody arrangements require additional planning to ensure fairness and consistency. For example, with a 50/50 custody arrangement, summer break can be divided between both parents. Common approaches for summer possession include alternating weeks throughout the summer or alternating extended periods to allow parents to take vacations or trips.

Holiday schedules can be more complex in a 50/50 arrangement. Typically, parents alternate holidays each year to ensure that both get to spend time with the child during special occasions; however, some parents may choose to split the entire day to allow the child to spend the holiday with each parent.

50/50 Custody in Texas: What You Need to Know

What Are the Pros and Cons of 50/50 Custody?

Considering a 50/50 schedule, it is important to consider the pros and cons of this type of arrangement. Some of the benefits of a 50/50 schedule include:

  • Balanced Time: The child spends equal time with both parents, which can strengthen relationships.
  • Reduced Conflict: Shared responsibility can reduce tension between parents.
  • Consistency: Children can have a more balanced experience with both parents.

On the other hand, some of the issues with a 50/50 schedule include:

  • Logistics: Managing two households and schedules can be challenging.
  • Stability: Constantly moving between homes might affect a child’s sense of stability. In contrast, a Standard Possession Schedule allows a child to have a “primary” home.
  • Communication: Requires high levels of cooperation and communication between parents. A 50/50 schedule may not be ideal for parents who struggle with communication.

Need Help with Custody Issues?

Navigating custody arrangements can be complex and emotional. At Varghese Summersett, our experienced family law attorneys are here to help you understand your rights and options. Call us today at (817) 900-3220 to discuss your case and get the support you need.

50/50 Custody in Texas: What You Need to Know

Varghese Summersett

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez Divorce: Key Takeaways

Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck have captivated Americans’ hearts for over 20 years. Their relationship timeline is filled with moments of joy, heartbreak, and, ultimately, rekindled love, which culminated in a divorce filing this week.

From their first meeting on the set of “Gigli” in 2002 to their recent marriage and subsequent challenges, the couple has remained a beloved fixture in the public eye. Their romance, affectionately dubbed “Bennifer,” has been a rollercoaster ride of ups and downs, with the couple facing intense media scrutiny, postponing their wedding in 2003, and eventually parting ways in 2004. Despite these setbacks, Lopez and Affleck remained friends and continued to support each other throughout the years.

In a surprising turn of events, the couple rekindled their romance in 2021, culminating in a fairytale wedding in Las Vegas in July 2022. But their marriage proved to be short-lived, with Lopez filing for divorce on August 20, 2024—the two-year anniversary of their wedding ceremony in Georgia.

In this article, the divorce attorneys at Varghese Summersett offer some insights into the end of Bennifer 2.0 and why the Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez divorce is anything but typical.

the pro se filing

Jennifer Lopez’s Pro Se Divorce Filing

Perhaps the most noteworthy aspect of the Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez divorce is that it was a “pro se” filing by Jennifer. In California, this is referred to as a “pro per” filing and that means Jennifer Lopez filed the divorce proceeding herself . She is not represented by counsel. While that would be highly unadvisable for most, there are a few reasons Ben and Jennifer may have chosen this route:

  1. Absence of Children: Since Lopez and Affleck do not have children together, custody and child support issues, which are often contentious in divorce cases, are not a factor in their situation.
  2. Amicable Proceedings: The couple’s decision to file pro se indicates a desire to maintain a peaceful and cooperative relationship during the divorce process. They’ve known each other long enough (and separated in the past) to be able to fairly predict they are not going to be arguing about anything.
  3. Staying Out of the Limelight: Ben and Jennifer may have also made the decision to keep the intimate details of their divorce out of the public eye. In Texas, a similar outcome can be achieved through a special process called collaborative divorce. A massive benefit of a collaborative divorce is it stays entirely out of the public domain.
  4. Experience: Jennifer Lopez has had three past divorces:
    • Ojani Noa (1997-1998)
    • Cris Judd (2001-2003)
    • Marc Anthony (2004-2014)

    Ben Affleck has had one past divorce:

    • Jennifer Garner (2005-2018)

    At this point, they know what they want and don’t want their divorce to be. That experience gives them an edge in handling their divorce on their own.

there's no pre-nup

Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement

Another surprising aspect of this high-profile divorce is the reported absence of a prenuptial agreement. For individuals with substantial assets or earning potential, a prenup is generally advisable for the following reasons:

  • Protection of Pre-marital Assets: A prenup clearly defines what assets each party brings into the marriage, protecting them in case of divorce.
  • Clarity on Financial Expectations: It sets clear expectations about financial responsibilities and rights during the marriage and in the event of a divorce.
  • Simplification of Divorce Proceedings: If divorce occurs, a prenup can significantly streamline the process, reducing emotional stress and legal costs.
  • Protection of Business Interests: For entrepreneurs or business owners, a prenup can safeguard business assets and interests.

Although at one time Lopez and Affleck may have believed their marriage would be forever, things turned out differently. Most people in this situation are not going to walk away without disagreements over finances. Affleck and Lopez are, both in Hollywood and outside, unique. For most, the prudent course of action is to have a prenuptial agreement particularly when significant assets are involved.

Community Property Laws

While Lopez filed for divorce in California, it’s worth noting how community property laws work in different states, such as Texas:

  • In Texas, any income earned or assets acquired during the marriage are generally considered community property, regardless of which spouse earned or acquired them.
  • This means that without a prenup, Lopez and Affleck’s earnings during their marriage could be subject to equal division, potentially resulting in a significant financial impact for both parties.

The Impact of Children on Divorce Proceedings

Although Lopez and Affleck don’t have children together, it’s essential to consider how children can complicate divorce proceedings:

  • Custody Arrangements: Determining custody and visitation schedules can be emotionally charged and time-consuming.
  • Child Support: Calculations for child support can be complex, especially with high-income parents.
  • Co-parenting Challenges: Divorced parents must learn to co-parent effectively, which can be particularly challenging for high-profile individuals.

Lessons from Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez Divorce

Lessons for High-Net-Worth Individuals

The Lopez-Affleck divorce underscores several key points for high-net-worth individuals considering marriage. While love and trust are the foundations of any relationship, financial security and foresight are crucial when significant assets are involved. Here’s what you need to keep in mind:

1. Always Consider a Prenup: Regardless of how certain you are about your relationship, a prenuptial agreement is a wise financial decision. A prenup can outline how assets will be divided in the event of a divorce, providing clarity and reducing conflict later on. For high-net-worth individuals, this agreement isn’t just about protecting what you currently have; it’s also about safeguarding future earnings, investments, and business interests. A well-drafted prenup can ensure that both parties enter the marriage with a clear understanding of financial expectations, preventing potential disputes down the road.

2. Protect Your Assets: Clearly define pre-marital assets and how future earnings will be handled. High-net-worth individuals often have complex financial portfolios, including real estate, stocks, businesses, and other investments. To protect these assets, it’s essential to distinguish between what was acquired before the marriage and what was accumulated during it. This distinction can significantly impact the division of assets in a divorce. Additionally, consider establishing trusts or other legal mechanisms that can further shield your wealth from potential disputes.

3. Plan for the Unexpected: Even if you believe your marriage will last forever, it’s crucial to plan for all possibilities. Life is unpredictable, and circumstances can change. A comprehensive marital agreement can address scenarios such as changes in income, the birth of children, or even the relocation of one or both spouses. Planning for these contingencies doesn’t mean you’re anticipating the end of your marriage; rather, it shows a commitment to ensuring that both parties are treated fairly, no matter what the future holds.

4. Seek Professional Advice: Consult with experienced family law attorneys who understand the complexities of high-net-worth divorces. Divorce for high-net-worth individuals involves more than just dividing assets—it can also involve issues related to privacy, reputational concerns, and the management of shared business interests. An attorney with expertise in high-net-worth cases can help you navigate these challenges, ensuring that your financial and personal interests are protected. Additionally, financial advisors and estate planners should be part of your team, providing a holistic approach to your financial security before, during, and after marriage.

While the end of a marriage is never easy, taking proactive steps can make the process less painful and more predictable. By considering these lessons from the Lopez-Affleck divorce, high-net-worth individuals can enter into marriage with confidence, knowing they are prepared for whatever the future may hold.

Ready for a Divorce? We Are.

At Varghese Summersett, we understand the unique challenges faced by high-net-worth individuals in family law matters. While we hope for the best in every marriage, we always advise our clients to protect their interests through careful planning and legal agreements. If you are contemplating divorce, it’s important to consult with an experienced family law attorney. Call 817-203-2220 to schedule a consultation with experienced attorney at Varghese Summersett.

measure our success by yours

Varghese Summersett

What Happens When a Drunk Driver Kills Someone?

On August 19, 2024, a catastrophic accident occurred on Interstate 35W in Fort Worth, Texas, resulting in the deaths of five family members, including two children. The crash, involving a suspected drunk driver in a Chevrolet Camaro, has sent shockwaves through the community and reignited discussions about the pervasive issue of impaired driving. This comes only one week after a Fort Worth police officer was killed by a drunk driver. In this article, our Fort Worth car accident lawyer explains what happens when a drunk driver kills someone.

Details of a Recent Fatal Crash

The incident unfolded when an intoxicated 19-year-old drove a Chevrolet Camaro at excessive speeds on the northbound lanes of I-35W. The driver lost control of the vehicle and violently rear-ended a sedan carrying a family of five. The force of the impact was so severe that it caused the sedan to burst into flames, tragically claiming the lives of all occupants.

Legal Implications and Potential Liability

Criminal Responsibility

The 19-year-old driver faces five counts of intoxication manslaughter, a second-degree felony in Texas. If convicted, each count carries a potential sentence of 2 to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Given the multiple fatalities, the driver could potentially face life in prison if sentenced consecutively. Notably, the legal age to drink in Texas is 21, so the 19-year old should not have been drinking at all. [Similarly, the driver who killed the Fort Worth officer was on probation and not allowed to drink alcohol.]

Insurance Claims

The insurance situation in this case could play a crucial role in potential compensation for the victims’ families:

  1. Driver-Owned Vehicle: If the 19-year-old driver owned the Camaro, his auto insurance policy would be the primary source for a claim. However, given the severity of the accident and multiple fatalities, the policy limits may be quickly exhausted.
  2. Permissive User: If the driver was using the Camaro with the owner’s permission (a “permissive user”), the vehicle owner’s insurance policy would typically be the primary coverage. In Texas, this coverage usually extends to anyone using the car with the owner’s consent.
  3. Policy Limits: It’s important to note that most personal auto insurance policies have per-person and per-accident limits. In a catastrophic case like this, these limits may be far below the actual damages incurred.
  4. Umbrella Policies: If either the driver or the vehicle owner (in case of permissive use) has an umbrella insurance policy, this could provide additional coverage beyond the auto policy limits.
  5. Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Coverage: If the victims’ own auto insurance included uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, their estates might be able to make a claim against this coverage if the at-fault driver’s insurance is insufficient.

claimants in drunk driving accident

Potential Claimants in a Deadly Drunk Driving Accident

Since the entire family perished in the accident, the following parties may have standing to bring wrongful death claims:

  1. Estates of the Deceased: The personal representatives of the estates of both the parents and children can file wrongful death claims on behalf of the deceased.
  2. Surviving Family Members: Under Texas law, parents, children, and spouses of the deceased can file wrongful death claims. In this case, grandparents, siblings, or other close relatives of the deceased family members may have standing to sue.

Additional Parties That Could Be Held Liable

  1. Vehicle Owner: If the Camaro was not owned by the driver but was entrusted to them by someone who knew or should have known about the driver’s intoxication or history of reckless driving, the owner could face liability under negligent entrustment laws.
  2. Alcohol Providers (Dram Shop Liability): If the driver was served alcohol at a bar, restaurant, or other establishment despite being visibly intoxicated or underage, the business could be held liable under Texas’s dram shop laws.
  3. Social Hosts: If the driver consumed alcohol at a private residence, the host could potentially be held responsible if they knowingly served alcohol to a minor or an obviously intoxicated person who they knew would be driving.

Compensation and Damages

Potential damages in a case like this could include:

  • Funeral and burial expenses
  • Loss of future income and benefits
  • Loss of companionship and consortium
  • Pain and suffering of the deceased before death
  • Punitive damages (given the egregious nature of drunk driving)

On average someone is killed by a drunk driver every 8 hours in Texas.

Fort Worth Drunk Driving Statistics

To provide context for this tragedy, it’s important to examine recent statistics on drunk driving in Fort Worth:

  • According to the Texas Department of Transportation, there were 120 traffic fatalities in Fort Worth in 2022.
  • Statewide, 1,163 people died in crashes involving drunk driving in 2021.
  • On average someone is killed by a drunk driver every 8 hours in Texas.
  • From 2012 to 2021, there were 13,536 fatalities involving drunk driving in Texas, accounting for 37 percent of all traffic fatalities.

These statistics underscore the ongoing challenge of combating drunk driving in the region.

Legal Challenges and Considerations

  1. Auto liability insurance: The drunk driver’s auto insurance policy may cover damages up to the policy limits, but many policies exclude coverage for intentional acts or criminal behavior.
  2. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage: If the drunk driver is uninsured or their coverage is insufficient, the victim’s family may need to rely on their own uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage.
  3. Wrongful death claims: The victim’s family may file a wrongful death lawsuit, which could involve various insurance policies depending on the circumstances.
  4. Dram shop liability: In some jurisdictions, establishments that served alcohol to the driver may face liability, potentially involving their commercial liability insurance.
  5. Insurance Coverage Disputes: There may be legal battles over the extent of insurance coverage, especially if policy limits are insufficient to cover the damages. This could involve disputes between different insurance companies or attempts to stack multiple policies.

Community Impact and Prevention Efforts

This tragic incident has galvanized the Fort Worth community to take action against drunk driving. Some potential initiatives include:

  1. Enhanced education programs in schools and communities about the dangers of impaired driving
  2. Promotion of ride-sharing services and designated driver programs

Contact Us

If you were injured or if you lost a family member due to a drunk driver, reach out to us today. We can help. This drunk driving accident is a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of impaired driving. Our goal is to seek justice for victims and drive systemic change to combat drunk driving. Call 817-203-2220 today for a fee consultation with an experienced personal injury lawyer.

Varghese Summersett

When news broke of the split between Molly-Mae Hague and Tommy Fury, fans of the popular couple were heartbroken. After all, Molly-Mae and Tommy had been coupled up since their time on the reality show Love Island in 2019, and it seemed like the perfect match.

But as many relationships go, things didn’t work out for the engaged couple, even after the birth of their baby girl. Obviously, they are the only ones who know exactly what led to the breakup, but as experienced divorce attorneys, we can make some educated guesses.

In this article, we offer potential reasons why their relationship ran into trouble. But first, here’s a history lesson on the couple if you’re new to the Molly-Mae and Tommy Fury love story.

Molly-Mae & Tommy Love Story

The Molly-May & Tommy Fury Love Story

Molly-Mae Hague and Tommy Fury’s love story began in 2019 when they met on Love Island UK, where they quickly became fan favorites and finished as runners-up. Their relationship blossomed during the show, and they continued to share their journey with fans through social media.

Key Milestones in Their Relationship

  • Love Island (2019): Molly-Mae and Tommy met during Season 5 of the show, where their chemistry was evident. Although they did not win, they garnered a significant following.
  • After the show, Molly-Mae and Tommy leveraged their popularity to build successful careers as influencers. Molly-Mae excelled in fashion and beauty, becoming the creative director for PrettyLittleThing, while Tommy pursued a career in boxing, being the younger brother of heavyweight champion Tyson Fury.
  • Home and Family: In March 2022, the couple purchased their first home together, marking a new chapter in their relationship. Later that year, on September 25, they announced they were expecting their first child. Their daughter, Bambi, was born in January 2023.
  • Engagement: Tommy proposed to Molly-Mae in July 2023 during what she initially thought was a fake brand trip. The proposal was a surprise, and they shared their joy with fans through social media posts.
  • Public Celebrations: They frequently celebrated milestones together, including their engagement anniversary and the first anniversary of their daughter’s birth, often sharing heartfelt messages and videos.

Molly-Mae and Tommy’s relationship has been characterized by both public adoration and personal challenges, making them prominent figures in contemporary reality television culture.

Molly-Mae & Tommy Breakup

The Molly-Mae & Tommy Breakup

On August 14, 2024, Molly-Mae Hague and Tommy Fury announced their breakup after five years together, which included the birth of their daughter, Bambi, in January 2023 and their engagement in July 2023. Both shared emotional statements on Instagram , expressing their heartbreak and prioritizing their daughter amidst the split. Molly-Mae stated, “Never in a million years did I think I’d ever have to write this,” emphasizing her shock at the end of their relationship.

The couple’s breakup has resonated with fans, marking the end of a significant chapter in the Love Island narrative, as they were seen as one of the show’s more genuine couples. The announcement follows a period of public celebration of their engagement and family life, making the split particularly shocking to their followers.

While the exact reason for their breakup remains unknown, a few potential factors could have contributed to their decision to part ways.

Reality TV Curse

The Reality TV Curse: Why It’s So Hard for Stars to Stay Together

First and foremost, it’s important to acknowledge that being in a relationship after appearing on a reality TV show is no easy feat. Many couples who form on shows like Love Island, The Bachelorette – or more recently, the Golden Bachelor – end up breaking up shortly after leaving the show. Molly-Mae and Tommy made it five years, but in the end, they couldn’t overcome the reality TV curse. Here’s why:

  • Public Scrutiny and Pressure: One of the most significant challenges that couples from reality TV face is the intense public scrutiny that follows them long after the cameras stop rolling. Molly-Mae and Tommy were no exception. Their relationship was born in front of millions, and every step they took—whether it was buying a home, having a baby, or getting engaged—was subject to public opinion. This constant attention can create immense pressure, making it difficult for a couple to navigate their relationship privately and naturally. For many, the need to maintain a public image can overshadow the reality of their personal lives, leading to stress and, eventually, cracks in the relationship.
  • High Expectations and Comparisons: Fans of reality TV often have idealized perceptions of the couples they watch. Molly-Mae and Tommy were seen as a “perfect couple” by many, which can lead to unrealistic expectations. When a couple is constantly held up as a model of relationship goals, any deviation from that image can feel like a failure. The pressure to live up to these expectations can create tension and dissatisfaction within the relationship. Additionally, being constantly compared to other couples or their past selves can make it difficult to evolve naturally.
  • Lifestyle Changes and Diverging Paths: Both Molly-Mae and Tommy have achieved significant success since leaving “Love Island.” While this is undoubtedly positive, it also means that their lives have changed drastically from when they first met. Molly-Mae’s career in fashion and beauty has skyrocketed, and Tommy has pursued a career in boxing. As their professional lives took off, their priorities and goals may have started to diverge. It’s not uncommon for couples to grow apart when they are on different paths, especially when their careers require so much of their time and energy.
  • The Impact of Social Media: Social media plays a huge role in the lives of reality TV stars, often amplifying the pressures they face. While it’s a powerful tool for building careers, it can also be a double-edged sword. For Molly-Mae and Tommy, sharing their lives on platforms like Instagram may have added strain to their relationship. The need to constantly update followers, maintain a certain image, and deal with online criticism or speculation can be exhausting. This can take a toll on even the strongest relationships.
  • The Transition from Reality TV to Real Life: Lastly, there’s the challenge of transitioning from a relationship that began in a highly controlled and edited environment to the real world. “Love Island,” like many reality shows, creates a unique bubble where couples are isolated from the outside world, free from the usual stresses of life. Once that bubble bursts, couples must face real-world challenges—like work, family, and everyday responsibilities—that weren’t part of their relationship in the beginning. For Molly-Mae and Tommy, the transition from “Love Island” to real life, with all its complexities, may have been harder than anticipated.

While only Molly-Mae and Tommy truly know what led to their breakup, the factors outlined above are common challenges that many reality TV couples face. The pressures of public scrutiny, the impact of social media, diverging career paths, and the reality TV curse itself can all contribute to the end of a relationship. Despite their split, Molly-Mae and Tommy’s journey will remain an iconic part of “Love Island” history, reminding us that even the most adored couples face challenges in the real world.

Challenges of Parenthood

The Challenges of Parenthood for Molly-Mae and Tommy

The arrival of their daughter Bambi may also have contributed to the breakdown of Molly-Mae and Tommy’s relationship. While welcoming a child into the world is an exciting experience, it can also bring about significant changes that likely contribute to a strain on their relationship.

  • Solo Parenting: Molly-Mae revealed she had been “solo parenting” for extended periods while Tommy was away for work commitments. In a vlog posted just days before their breakup announcement, she said, “I have been solo parenting pretty much the entire week. Actually, I’ve been solo parenting for like, two weeks now, basically because Tommy’s just been so busy.”
  • Work-Life Balance: The couple struggled to balance their careers with parenting responsibilities. Tommy was often away due to his boxing career and other commitments, such as recording an audiobook. This left Molly-Mae feeling overwhelmed as she tried to juggle her own work and caring for their daughter Bambi.
  • Emotional Strain: Molly-Mae openly discussed feeling emotionally challenged by parenthood. She admitted, “I just feel like at the minute I’ve been struggling a little bit, which is fine, I feel like with motherhood some stages are easier than others.” This emotional strain likely impacted their relationship.
  • Differing Lifestyles: As their relationship progressed, it appeared that Molly-Mae and Tommy were leading increasingly different lifestyles. Molly-Mae’s focus shifted more towards parenting, while Tommy’s career demands kept him away from home frequently.
  • Intimacy Issues: Molly-Mae had been candid about challenges in their intimate life post-baby. She revealed that she and Tommy hadn’t had sex for 11 months after the birth of their daughter, which could have added strain to their relationship. In fact, it has been widely reported that Tommy may have been unfaithful, with reports claiming he was seen kissing another woman in a nightclub and that Molly-Mae suspects he cheated multiple times. However, Tommy has strongly denied these cheating allegations through his representatives, calling them “false” and “horrifying.”These challenges highlight the complex realities of parenthood, especially for young couples in the public eye. The pressures of balancing careers, personal lives, and parenting responsibilities proved to be a significant test for Molly-Mae and Tommy’s relationship.

Cultural Differences & Traveller Traditions

Cultural Differences and Traveller Traditions

Tommy Fury is a Traveller, a cultural group in the UK with unique traditions and customs that they pass down from generations. His background and upbringing may have shaped his views on relationships, marriage, and family life, which could have created some tension in his relationship with Molly-Mae Hague, potentially contributing to their breakup such as:

  • Traditional Gender Roles: In Traveller culture, men are often seen as providers while women are expected to take care of the household and children. This traditional view on gender roles may have clashed with Molly-Mae’s more modern outlook on relationships.
  • Educational Values: Traditionally, many Traveller children may leave formal education after primary school to learn practical skills from their families. This practice can lead to differing views on education compared to mainstream society. Molly-Mae expressed concerns about traditional Traveller attitudes towards education. She stated that their child not going to school was “absolutely non-optional” for her, contrasting with some Traveller traditions where children may leave formal education early.
  • Family Size Expectations: Tommy, in keeping with his family traditions, expressed a desire for “around 10 kids.” However, Molly-Mae insisted they wouldn’t have more than three children, indicating a significant difference in family planning views.
  • Parenting Approaches: Tommy expressed a desire to raise their daughter “the way I have been brought up. The old fashion way, the right way.” This traditional approach seemed to conflict with Molly-Mae’s more modern parenting ideas.
  • Cultural Identity: Molly-Mae pointed out that their daughter would only have “one quarter Traveller blood,” suggesting she might have been downplaying the influence of Tommy’s cultural background.

These cultural differences, rooted in Tommy’s Traveller background, seem to have created fundamental disagreements about important life decisions such as education, family size, and parenting styles. While initially, these differences may have been part of their attraction, they ultimately became points of contention that likely contributed to the strain on their relationship and eventual breakup.

Life After the Breakup

The split between Molly-Mae Hague and Tommy Fury marks a significant turning point in both of their lives, but as with any breakup, life goes on. For two people as successful and driven as Molly-Mae and Tommy, this new chapter may offer them opportunities for growth, both personally and professionally.

  • Molly-Mae’s Journey Forward:
    Molly-Mae has always been known for her resilience and strong work ethic, qualities that will undoubtedly help her navigate this challenging time. With her role as Creative Director of PrettyLittleThing and her influence in the fashion and beauty industries, she has a solid foundation to continue building her career. Moreover, Molly-Mae may also use this period to reconnect with herself and prioritize her own well-being. As she navigates life as a single mother, she may find solace in her close-knit circle of family and friends, who have always been a source of support for her.
  • Tommy Fury’s Path Ahead
    For Tommy, the end of his relationship with Molly-Mae could serve as a catalyst for him to refocus on his boxing career. As the younger brother of heavyweight champion Tyson Fury, Tommy has always had big shoes to fill, and this moment may push him to dedicate more time and energy to his training and matches. In addition to his athletic pursuits, Tommy may also explore other opportunities in the entertainment industry. His charisma and popularity could open doors for him in reality TV, modeling, or even acting, allowing him to build a multifaceted career. On a personal level, Tommy may use this time to reflect on his priorities and what he wants out of future relationships. As a young man with a demanding career, finding the right balance between his professional ambitions and personal life will be key to his future happiness.
  • Co-Parenting and Moving Forward
    Despite their breakup, Molly-Mae and Tommy will continue to be linked by their shared love for their daughter, Bambi. Co-parenting will likely be a central focus for both of them as they work together to provide a stable and loving environment for their child. Navigating co-parenting in the public eye will come with its challenges, but both Molly-Mae and Tommy have expressed their commitment to putting Bambi’s well-being first. They may choose to keep certain aspects of their co-parenting journey private, allowing them to shield their daughter from unnecessary public scrutiny.

    As they move forward, it’s possible that both Molly-Mae and Tommy will find new love and form relationships with others. Given their high profiles, any new relationship they enter will inevitably attract attention, but with the experience they’ve gained, they may approach future relationships with a greater understanding of what they need and want.

The breakup between Molly-Mae Hague and Tommy Fury is undoubtedly a significant moment in their lives, but it also marks the beginning of new opportunities and personal growth. As they each embark on their separate journeys, they will continue to captivate their fans with their resilience, determination, and ability to overcome challenges.

Separated with Children? Contact Us.

Deciding to separate if you have children, whether you have been together 2 years or 20 years, is never an easy decision. That’s why it’s important to have the support and guidance of an experienced family lawyer who can help you navigate this difficult process with care and compassion.

At Varghese Summersett, we understand the complexities of separation and are dedicated to providing personalized solutions tailored to your unique situation. Call 817-203-2220 to schedule a consultation with an experienced North Texas divorce lawyer.

Our lawyers make sure that every ending is a new beginning.