News
 
Varghese Summersett

Holding Private Schools Accountable for Sexual Abuse in Texas

When a teacher or faculty member sexually abuses a student, one would expect the school to be held accountable—especially if there were warning signs or ignored reports. In Texas, however, public schools are provided an unconscionable level of immunity that can make legal action against them extremely difficult. Private schools, by contrast, do not benefit from the same broad legal protections and it is still possible hold them responsible for the improper hiring and retention of employees who are involved in sexual abuse in private schools.

Sexual Abuse in Texas Schools

Schools should provide a secure environment where young people can learn, grow, and develop confidence. Families trust teachers, administrators, and other staff to guard their children against harm. Unfortunately, sexual abuse within educational settings continues to be a serious issue, and when such abuse happens, it is often a sign that the school’s protective measures have failed. Survivors of school-related abuse—and their families—may have legal avenues to seek justice and demand accountability from both the perpetrator and the institution.

Taking the step to come forward can be emotionally overwhelming, yet the law does offer ways to pursue justice through civil claims, criminal charges, and institutional reforms. Understanding the nature of sexual abuse in schools is an essential first step. This form of abuse can be carried out by individuals in positions of authority—such as teachers, coaches, or other staff—or even by fellow students. In many cases, abusers manipulate their power or exploit a child’s trust, which makes it difficult for victims to speak out right away.

grooming in schools

Understanding Grooming in Schools

Grooming is a manipulative process used by predators to gain access to a victim, build trust, and ultimately commit abuse while reducing the risk of being caught. This behavior can occur in schools, extracurricular activities, and online, often involving trusted adults such as teachers, coaches, or mentors.

How Grooming Happens

Grooming typically follows a pattern, making it essential to recognize the warning signs early. The process often includes the following stages:

1. Victim Selection

Abusers carefully choose their victims based on their perceived vulnerability or ease of access. They may observe students and identify those who seem isolated, trusting, or in need of attention.

2. Gaining Access and Isolation

To establish control, predators work to separate the victim from protective influences, such as parents, teachers, or friends. They may offer special treatment, private meetings, or extra help to create opportunities for one-on-one interactions.

3. Building Trust and Keeping Secrets

Abusers manipulate victims by offering gifts, giving excessive attention, and creating a sense of special friendship. They often introduce secrecy, encouraging the child to hide details of their relationship from others.

4. Desensitization to Physical Contact and Sexual Topics

What may start as seemingly innocent physical contact—such as hugs, playful wrestling, or back rubs—can escalate into inappropriate touching. Abusers may also introduce discussions about sexual topics, share explicit content, or test boundaries to make the victim more accepting of sexual behavior.

5. Normalizing Abuse

The predator may attempt to make their behavior seem natural to avoid suspicion. Teens, in particular, may struggle to recognize grooming tactics, especially if they involve secrecy, manipulation, or emotional dependence.

Grooming the Family and Community

Groomers do not just target the victim—they often gain the trust of families and communities to reduce suspicion. They may appear helpful, kind, and trustworthy, making it harder for others to believe a child if they report inappropriate behavior.

While most adults involved in a child’s life are well-intentioned, it is important to be aware that grooming can take place in even the safest-seeming environments. Parents should remain engaged in their child’s activities and relationships, encouraging open communication about personal boundaries.

Online Grooming

Predators can also groom victims online, often by posing as children or teens to build trust. They may attempt to gain personal information, send explicit content, or pressure the child into secretive conversations. Parents and educators should teach children about online safety and encourage open discussions about their digital interactions.

Preventing Grooming and Protecting Children

  • Encourage open conversations with children about personal boundaries and safe relationships.
  • Be cautious of adults who insist on spending excessive one-on-one time with a child.
  • Monitor online activity and educate children about online grooming tactics.
  • Teach children that they can say “no” to any behavior that makes them uncomfortable.
  • Trust your instincts—if an adult’s behavior feels inappropriate, take action and report concerns.

protections for public schools

The Unconscionable Protections for Public Schools

There are a number of ways public schools and school districts are protected from bring held responsible in Texas.

Governmental Immunity

Texas public schools are generally shielded by governmental immunity, meaning they cannot be sued for most claims unless the legislature has specifically allowed it. This protection extends to negligence-based lawsuits—such as those alleging negligent hiring, training, or supervision of an abusive employee.

Strict Title IX Requirements

Because of immunity, families seeking to hold a public school responsible for a teacher’s sexual abuse typically rely on Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program receiving federal funds, which includes most public schools. However, courts have set a high bar for these cases:

Actual Knowledge

A school official with authority to correct the problem—often a superintendent or a high-level administrator—must have actual knowledge of the abuse or harassment.

Deliberate Indifference

The school’s response must be shown to be so unreasonable that it amounts to deliberate indifference. In other words, it is not enough that the school handled the situation poorly; you must prove they essentially ignored it or failed to act in a way any reasonable institution would.

Severe, Pervasive, and Objectively Offensive

The harassment or assault must be serious and must effectively deprive the victim of educational opportunities. While sexual assault by a teacher clearly meets this threshold of harm, courts still focus heavily on whether top-level officials knew or should have known.

Protection for Public Schools on Appeal

Even when victims win at trial, these cases may be overturned on appeal if the appellate court rules that the district did not meet Title IX’s actual-knowledge requirement. This happened in a high-profile lawsuit involving South San Antonio ISD, where a vice principal allegedly abused a student. A trial court initially awarded $5 million, but the Fifth Circuit reversed it because knowledge by the vice principal himself was not enough to show the district had actual notice.

A 2021 Supreme Court decision, Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., may further limit the damages awarded under Title IX. Because Title IX is enacted under the Constitution’s Spending Clause, some courts now say that victims cannot recover emotional distress damages—often the biggest component of harm in child sexual abuse cases.

HOLDING PRIVATE SCHOOLS RESPONSIBLE

Holding Private Schools Responsible for Sexual Abuse

Private schools do not have the same broad legal protections as public schools. Families can bring standard negligence claims—such as negligent hiring or supervision—without dealing with governmental immunity or strict Title IX standards. This often provides more opportunities to hold private schools accountable.

For example, if a school fails to supervise its employees or properly screen new hires, families may file negligence claims. These claims can lead to compensation for injuries, emotional distress, and other damages. The ability to hold private schools directly liable encourages them to maintain higher safety standards.

Thousands of Texas Parents Entrust Their Children to Private Schools

Thousands of Texas parents entrust their children to private schools, believing they are providing a safe and nurturing environment for their education and growth. When that trust is broken due to negligence or misconduct, it can be incredibly difficult to consider legal action against the very institution you chose for your child. However, holding schools accountable is often the only way to bring about meaningful change, ensuring better protections for students in the future. Pursuing legal action is not just about seeking justice for your own child—it’s about preventing harm to others, pushing schools to enforce stricter safety policies, and demanding the accountability that every family deserves.

Texas Private School City Students Student:Teacher Ratio
The Village School Houston 1,750 11:1
The Awty International School Houston 1,717 7:1
St. John’s School Houston 1,493 7:1
Trinity Christian Academy Addison 1,470 10:1
Prestonwood Christian Academy Plano 1,444 8:1
The Kinkaid School Houston 1,423 10:1
Liberty Christian School Argyle 1,305 11:1
Greenhill School Addison 1,292 9:1
Midland Christian School Midland 1,238 12:1
The John Cooper School The Woodlands 1,201 10:1
Second Baptist School Houston 1,200 12:1
The Episcopal School of Dallas Dallas 1,170 8:1
Cornerstone Christian Schools San Antonio 1,149 12:1
The Parish Episcopal School Dallas 1,130 10:1
Jesuit College Preparatory School Dallas 1,108 8:1
Fort Worth Country Day School Fort Worth 1,100 7:1
San Antonio Christian School San Antonio 1,100 12:1
The Hockaday School Dallas 1,098 9:1
Bishop Lynch High School Dallas 1,052 12:1
Trinity Valley School Fort Worth 1,020 10:1
Strake Jesuit College Preparatory Houston 1,018 12:1
Regents School of Austin Austin 1,011 8:1
St. Mary’s Hall San Antonio 993 7:1
Prince of Peace Christian School Carrollton 958 11:1
Grace Community School Tyler 952 10:1
All Saints Episcopal School Fort Worth 945 8:1
Lutheran South Academy Houston 933 10:1
St. Agnes Academy Houston 927 10:1
St. Andrew’s Episcopal School Austin 890 6:1
St. Mark’s School of Texas Dallas 884 9:1
Episcopal High School Bellaire 824 7:1
Ursuline Academy of Dallas Dallas 800 10:1
The Oakridge School Arlington 800 8:1
The Woodlands Christian Academy The Woodlands 750 10:1
The Highlands School Irving 700 7:1
The Covenant School Dallas 600 8:1
Houston Christian High School Houston 500 8:1
The Lamplighter School Dallas 450 7:1
Cistercian Preparatory School Irving 350 6:1
The Winston School Dallas 200 6:1
The Cambridge School of Dallas Dallas 150 6:1

Tough cases call for the toughest lawyers.

Legal Claims Against Private Schools For Sexual Abuse in Texas

Victims of sexual abuse in private schools may have multiple legal avenues. Some potential claims include:

Negligent Hiring

A school may be liable if it failed to properly screen or check an employee who later harmed a student.

Elements to Prove:

  • Duty of Care: The school is responsible for hiring safe and competent employees, particularly those working with children.
  • Breach of Duty: The school failed to use reasonable care in the hiring process, such as neglecting to check an applicant’s background.
  • Causation:
    • Cause in Fact: The school’s negligent hiring directly allowed a dangerous employee to access students.
    • Proximate Cause & Foreseeability: The harm was a foreseeable consequence of hiring an employee without proper vetting.
  • Damages: The victim must show harm, such as physical injuries or emotional distress.

Negligent Supervision

This claim arises if a school fails to properly monitor its staff or student interactions, allowing abuse to occur.

Elements to Prove:

  • Duty of Care: The school must provide proper supervision to ensure student safety.
  • Breach of Duty: The school’s lack of supervision created an unsafe environment, such as allowing unsupervised access to students.
  • Causation:
    • Cause in Fact: The failure to supervise directly led to the abuse.
    • Proximate Cause & Foreseeability: A reasonable school should have foreseen that poor supervision could lead to harm.
  • Damages: The victim must demonstrate actual harm, such as emotional trauma.

General Negligence

If a school fails to take reasonable steps to protect students from known risks, it may be held liable for general negligence.

Elements to Prove:

  • Duty of Care: The school has a general obligation to provide a safe environment.
  • Breach of Duty: The school did not take reasonable safety measures.
  • Causation:
    • Cause in Fact: The school’s failure to act directly caused the harm.
    • Proximate Cause & Foreseeability: The injury was a foreseeable result of the school’s negligence.
  • Damages: The victim must prove measurable losses.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Victims may claim emotional distress if a school’s actions (or inactions) were extreme and caused severe trauma.

Elements to Prove:

  • Extreme and Outrageous Conduct: The school’s actions were beyond what is acceptable in society.
  • Intent or Reckless Disregard: The school either intended to cause distress or recklessly disregarded its impact.
  • Causation:
    • Cause in Fact: The distress resulted from the school’s conduct.
    • Proximate Cause & Foreseeability: The distress was a foreseeable result of the school’s actions.
  • Severe Emotional Distress: The victim must prove their distress was extreme.

Understanding Foreseeability and Proximate Cause

Foreseeability

In negligence claims, foreseeability examines whether a reasonable school should have anticipated that failing to screen or supervise employees could lead to abuse. If harm was foreseeable, the school should have taken preventive measures.

Proximate Cause

Proximate cause links the school’s negligence to the victim’s harm. In Texas, the injury must be a natural and probable result of the school’s failure to act.

our bench is deep

How Varghese Summersett Can Help You

If you or a loved one has suffered abuse at a private school, navigating the legal process can feel overwhelming. The experienced attorneys at Varghese Summersett are here to guide you through every step, ensuring your rights are protected and that justice is pursued.

Guiding You Through the Criminal Investigation

Understanding how the criminal justice system works can be challenging, especially when dealing with trauma. Our attorneys have extensive experience working with law enforcement and prosecutors. We will:

  • Explain the investigation process in clear, simple terms.
  • Ensure you know your rights and what to expect.
  • Work to protect your interests during questioning or testimony.

Connecting You with Experienced Counselors

Healing from trauma is just as important as seeking justice. We understand that legal action is only part of the recovery process. That’s why we help connect you with skilled counselors who specialize in working with survivors of abuse. These professionals provide the support and guidance needed to move forward.

Helping You Properly Document What Happened

Proper documentation is crucial in building a strong case. Our team will assist you in:

  • Gathering and organizing evidence, including medical records and witness statements.
  • Keeping a detailed record of any interactions with the school or law enforcement.
  • Ensuring all necessary legal documents are prepared and filed correctly.

Filing a Demand and Lawsuit

Once we have gathered the necessary evidence, our attorneys will draft a formal demand to the responsible parties. If a fair settlement is not reached, we will take legal action by filing a lawsuit. Our goal is to:

  • Hold the school accountable for its negligence.
  • Seek compensation for medical expenses, emotional distress, and other damages.
  • Ensure policies are changed to protect other students from harm.

Holding the School Responsible

Schools have a duty to protect students, and when they fail, they must be held accountable. By taking legal action, we can help bring justice to victims and push for necessary changes in school policies and safety measures. Our legal team is committed to:

  • Fighting aggressively for your rights.
  • Ensuring those responsible are held liable for their negligence.
  • Advocating for stronger protections for students in private schools.

Contact Varghese Summersett Today

If you or someone you love has been affected by abuse at a private school, do not wait to seek legal help. The attorneys at Varghese Summersett are ready to stand by your side, offering compassionate guidance and aggressive representation. Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation and take the first step toward justice.

Varghese Summersett

40 Under 40 - 2025Attorney Ty Stimpson, a partner at Varghese Summersett, has been recognized as one of Fort Worth Inc.’s 40 Under 40—a prestigious award honoring the city’s brightest and most promising leaders under age 40.

Stimpson and the other honorees were celebrated on Thursday, Feb. 13, during a banquet at River Ranch Stockyards. He is also featured in this month’s edition of Fort Worth Inc. magazine.

“It’s an honor to be recognized alongside so many exceptional men and women in this city,” Stimpson said. “This award represents more than just individual achievement—it’s a reflection of the mentors who paved the way for me, the clients who trust me to fight for them, and the community that continues to inspire me.”

This marks the first year Fort Worth Inc. has presented the 40 Under 40 awards. Previously, the Fort Worth Business Press oversaw the program, launching the initiative in 1994. Fort Worth Inc. acquired the distinguished program last year.

Attorney Ty Stimpson Named a 40 Under 40 By Fort Worth Inc.

 

 

 

 

The 40 Under 40 awards recognize rising leaders in Greater Fort Worth who are making a lasting impact in business and the community. Over the years, many honorees have become some of the region’s most influential figures. Now, under Fort Worth Inc.’s leadership, the program continues its tradition of celebrating excellence and service.

Stimpson embodies these qualities . As a partner at Varghese Summersett, he leads the firm’s Personal Injury Division, advocating for victims who have suffered catastrophic injuries or lost loved ones due to negligent or wrongful acts. His commitment to service extends far beyond the courtroom—he is actively involved in more than a dozen organizations, including the Tarrant Area Food Bank, Boys & Girls Club of Greater Tarrant County, and the Fort Worth Black Chamber of Commerce.

Through these organizations and others, he champions causes that promote education, equality, and empowerment. His dedication to service and leadership has also earned him the 2023 Young Professional of the Year Award from the Fort Worth Chamber and the 2023 Dr. Marion Brooks “Legend in the Making” Award for Law.

Stimpson is not the first attorney at Varghese Summersett to receive this esteemed recognition. Last year, Anna Summersett, co-founder of the firm, was also honored as a 40 Under 40 recipient.

We couldn’t be more proud of Ty and his well-deserved recognition as one of Fort Worth’s 40 Under 40,” said Managing Partner Benson Varghese. “Having back-to-back recipients from our firm is a testament to the great leaders we have on our team — driven individuals committed to excellence, philanthropy, and service to this city.”

Ty Recognized as 40 Under 40
(From Left to Right: Anna Summersett, Ty Stimpson, Benson Varghese)
Varghese Summersett

Texas is the backbone of American industry. From oil refineries and chemical plants to manufacturing facilities and construction sites, industrial workers keep the economy running. But their jobs come with serious risks. Every year, thousands of Texas industrial workers suffer life-altering injuries or die due to hazardous conditions.

Industrial corporations often prioritize profits over worker safety, cutting corners on maintenance, training, and equipment. When companies fail to protect their employees, the consequences can be catastrophic—explosions, toxic exposure, and fatal falls. If you have suffered an industrial injury or lost a loved one,  you may be entitled to substantial compensation for medical or funeral expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.

In this article, our Texas industrial injury attorneys at Varghese Summersett give an overview of various types of industrial accidents, common injuries, who can be held liable, and how an experienced personal injury attorney can help.

Types of Industrial Accidents

Types of Industrial Accidents

An industrial accident is an unexpected event that occurs in a workplace, typically in an industrial setting such as construction sites, factories, warehouses, oil rigs, or manufacturing plants. These accidents often result in injuries, illnesses, or fatalities and can be caused by hazardous working conditions, equipment malfunctions, human error, or failure to follow safety protocols. Industrial accidents vary in severity, but many share common causes. Some of the most frequent types of industrial accidents include:

  • Explosions and Fires: Oil refineries, chemical plants, and manufacturing facilities handle flammable materials daily. Poor safety protocols or equipment malfunctions can lead to devastating explosions and fires.
  • Falls from Heights: Construction workers, scaffolders, and industrial laborers often work at significant heights. Faulty ladders, weak railings, or missing harnesses contribute to severe fall-related injuries.
  • Machinery Accidents: Heavy machinery—like forklifts, conveyor belts, and assembly-line equipment—can cause crush injuries, amputations, and fatal accidents if not properly maintained or operated.
  • Toxic Chemical Exposure: Industrial sites use hazardous substances that can cause immediate harm or long-term illnesses, including respiratory diseases and cancer.
  • Electrocution: Unsafe electrical wiring, exposed power lines, and defective tools pose a constant electrocution risk for industrial workers.

Common Industrial Injuries

Common Industrial Injuries

Industrial accidents often result in catastrophic injuries that leave workers unable to return to their jobs. Some of the most common industrial injuries include:

  • Burns – Caused by fires, explosions, or chemical exposure
  • Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs) – From falls, falling objects, or machinery accidents
  • Spinal Cord Injuries – Caused by falls, crush accidents or falling objects
  • Amputations – Due to machinery malfunctions or crush accidents
  • Respiratory Diseases – From prolonged exposure to toxic chemicals
  • Hearing Loss – Caused by constant exposure to high-decibel machinery
  • Broken Bones and Crush Injuries – Resulting from falls, equipment malfunctions, or heavy object collisions

How Industrial Accidents Occur

How Industrial Accidents Occur

Industrial accidents are a serious concern that can lead to severe injuries, long-term health consequences, or even fatalities. These incidents often occur due to a combination of negligence, unsafe working conditions, and inadequate training. In many cases, accidents are preventable if proper safety protocols are followed, equipment is well-maintained, and employees receive thorough training. However, when corners are cut or safety regulations are ignored, the likelihood of an accident increases significantly.

The most common causes of industrial accidents include:

  • Poor Maintenance – Failing to repair or replace faulty equipment can lead to dangerous malfunctions, putting workers at risk of injury or exposure to hazardous conditions. Machines that are not regularly inspected may break down unexpectedly, causing catastrophic consequences.
  • Lack of Proper Safety Gear – Many workplaces require protective equipment such as harnesses, helmets, gloves, or fireproof clothing. When this gear is missing or not used properly, workers are left vulnerable to falls, burns, or exposure to harmful chemicals.
  • Inadequate Training – Operating heavy machinery, handling chemicals, or responding to emergencies all require specialized knowledge. When employees do not receive proper training, they are more likely to make mistakes that result in accidents.
  • Overworked Employees – Fatigue is a major contributing factor to workplace accidents. Long hours, insufficient breaks, and demanding workloads can lead to impaired judgment, slower reaction times, and an overall increase in errors that put workers at risk.
  • Unsafe Work Environments – Cluttered floors, unsecured scaffolding, poor ventilation, or hazardous substances left exposed can create dangerous conditions for workers. A lack of proper safety measures in the workplace can lead to slips, falls, chemical exposure, or structural collapses.

Industrial accidents not only affect the injured workers but also have broader consequences for businesses and society. Employers may face legal liability, financial losses, and reputational damage. Meanwhile, injured employees may struggle with medical expenses, lost wages, and long-term disabilities. Preventing industrial accidents requires a proactive approach, including routine safety inspections, strict adherence to regulations, and a workplace culture that prioritizes worker well-being.

Wrongful Death in Industrial Accidents

When an industrial accident results in a fatality, surviving family members may be entitled to compensation through a wrongful death claim. In Texas, wrongful death lawsuits can be filed by the deceased’s spouse, children, or parents under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 71.002.

Eligible family members may seek damages for:

  • Funeral and burial expenses
  • Loss of income and financial support
  • Loss of companionship and emotional suffering
  • Medical expenses incurred before death
  • Punitive damages if gross negligence was involved

In many cases, liability may extend beyond the employer to third parties such as equipment manufacturers, subcontractors, and property owners. A skilled Texas industrial injury attorney can investigate the case, determine liability, and fight for the maximum compensation available under Texas law.

Deadliest Industrial Disasters

Year Location Incident Deaths
1947 Texas City, TX Texas City Disaster (Ship Explosion) 581
1984 Bhopal, India* Union Carbide Chemical Leak 15,000+
2005 Texas City, TX BP Refinery Explosion 15
2013 West, TX West Fertilizer Plant Explosion 15

*Note: The Bhopal disaster was an international tragedy, but Union Carbide was a U.S.-owned company.

Who Can Be Held Liable for Industrial Accidents

Who Can Be Held Liable for Industrial Accidents?

In Texas, liability in industrial accidents can extend beyond just the employer, as multiple parties may bear responsibility for ensuring a safe work environment. Given the state’s significant industrial presence—including oil and gas, construction, and manufacturing—workplace accidents can have serious legal and financial implications. Texas law allows injured workers to pursue claims against various parties whose negligence contributed to the accident, especially when employer-provided workers’ compensation does not fully cover the damages.

Potentially responsible parties in an industrial accident may include:

  • Employers – If an employer fails to maintain safe working conditions, disregards safety regulations, or does not provide adequate training, they can be held liable for accidents that occur on the job. In Texas, many employers subscribe to the state’s workers’ compensation system, which provides financial benefits to injured employees but also limits the ability to sue the employer directly. However, non-subscriber employers—those who opt out of the workers’ compensation system—can be sued for negligence.
  • Manufacturers – If a defective piece of equipment, faulty machinery, or poorly designed safety gear contributed to an accident, the manufacturer may be held responsible under product liability laws. Injured workers may pursue claims for design defects, manufacturing flaws, or failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions.
  • Contractors or Subcontractors – Many Texas industrial workplaces involve multiple contractors and subcontractors working alongside each other. If an independent contractor or subcontractor fails to follow safety protocols, disregards industry standards, or contributes to hazardous conditions, they may be held accountable for injuries resulting from their negligence.
  • Property Owners – If an accident occurs on a job site due to dangerous property conditions—such as unsafe scaffolding, chemical exposure, or structural hazards—the property owner may bear responsibility, particularly if they were aware of the danger and failed to take corrective action.
  • Third-Party Vendors – Industrial facilities often rely on external vendors for maintenance, inspections, and repairs. If an outside maintenance crew neglects safety protocols or improperly services equipment, they can be held liable for any accidents that occur as a result of their negligence.

Navigating liability in Texas industrial accidents can be complex, especially with multiple parties involved. Unlike many states, Texas does not require all employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance, which can open the door for personal injury lawsuits in cases of employer negligence. Additionally, third-party claims allow injured workers to seek compensation beyond what is covered by workers’ comp, holding negligent manufacturers, property owners, or contractors accountable.

Because Texas follows a modified comparative negligence rule, any party found to be more than 50 percent responsible for an accident may be barred from recovering damages. Due to these legal intricacies, injured workers should consult with an experienced attorney who can evaluate the circumstances of their case and pursue rightful compensation.

workmans comp vs. pi claims

Workers’ Compensation vs. Personal Injury Claims in Texas Industrial Accidents

Texas has unique laws regarding workers’ compensation. Unlike most states, Texas does not require private employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance. This means:

  • If your employer has workers’ compensation, you can file a claim but cannot sue them for negligence.
  • If your employer does not have workers’ comp, you may have the right to file a personal injury lawsuit for negligence, which can provide greater compensation.
  • If a third party (such as a contractor or equipment manufacturer) caused the accident, you can pursue a personal injury lawsuit regardless of workers’ comp status.

negligence

Proving Negligence in Industrial Accident Cases

To win an industrial injury case, your Texas industrial accident attorney must prove four things:

  1. Duty of Care – The responsible party had a legal obligation to maintain a safe workplace.
  2. Breach of Duty – The company, manufacturer, or contractor failed to uphold safety regulations.
  3. Causation – The negligence directly caused the industrial accident.
  4. Damages – The accident led to injuries, financial losses, or death.

Here’s a hypothetical example of how these elements might play out in an industrial accident case: John, a 42-year-old refinery worker in Texas, suffered severe burns and a spinal cord injury when a pressurized gas line exploded at his worksite. His employer, XYZ Refining Co., had been previously warned by inspectors about outdated pipes and faulty pressure valves but failed to make necessary repairs.

1. Duty of Care

XYZ Refining Co. had a legal obligation under OSHA regulations and Texas workplace safety laws to maintain a safe work environment. This included ensuring that all machinery, pipelines, and safety protocols were up to standard to prevent hazardous conditions.

2. Breach of Duty

Despite multiple warnings from safety inspectors and employee complaints about leaking gas, XYZ Refining Co. ignored maintenance recommendations. They failed to repair the outdated pipes, neglected to replace the faulty pressure valve, and did not provide proper safety training to workers on emergency shut-off procedures.

3. Causation

The explosion was a direct result of the company’s negligence. Had XYZ Refining Co. properly maintained the gas lines and valves, the accident would have been preventable. Investigators determined that the neglected equipment led to a pressure buildup, which ultimately caused the explosion that injured John.

4. Damages

John suffered third-degree burns, spinal cord trauma, and permanent mobility impairment. His injuries required multiple surgeries, extensive rehabilitation, and he lost his ability to work. His medical bills exceeded $500,000, and he faced emotional trauma and loss of future income.

Hypothetical Outcome

With the help of a Texas industrial injury attorney, John filed a personal injury lawsuit against XYZ Refining Co. His legal team presented OSHA reports, maintenance logs, and expert witness testimony to prove negligence. John was awarded economic, non-economic, and punitive damages for the company’s reckless disregard for safety. This case illustrates how proving negligence requires clear evidence that an employer failed to uphold safety regulations, leading to a preventable workplace accident.

Types of Compensation for a Texas Oilfield Accident

Types of Compensation Available

Industrial injury victims may be entitled to several forms of compensation, depending on the severity of their injuries and the level of negligence involved. Compensation is designed to help victims recover financially, emotionally, and physically after an accident.

Economic Damages

Economic damages cover the tangible, financial losses suffered due to an industrial accident. These include:

  • Medical Expenses – Covers hospital stays, surgeries, doctor visits, medications, rehabilitation, and ongoing care.
  • Lost Wages – Compensation for time missed from work due to the injury.
  • Loss of Future Earnings – If the injury prevents the victim from returning to work, they may be entitled to compensation for lost earning capacity.
  • Rehabilitation Costs – Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and other medical services required for recovery.
  • Home and Vehicle Modifications – If the injury leads to permanent disability, costs for wheelchair ramps, modified vehicles, or in-home medical assistance may be covered.

Non-Economic Damages

These damages compensate for intangible losses that impact the victim’s quality of life. This includes:

  • Pain and Suffering – Compensation for the physical pain endured from the injury.
  • Emotional Distress – Covers the psychological impact, including PTSD, depression, and anxiety.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life – When the victim is unable to participate in hobbies, activities, or family life as they did before the accident.
  • Loss of Consortium – Compensation for the negative effects of the injury on a victim’s relationship with their spouse or family.

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are awarded in cases involving gross negligence or reckless disregard for worker safety. These damages serve as a punishment to the responsible party and a deterrent to prevent similar conduct in the future. Employers or third parties may face punitive damages if they:

  • Knowingly ignored safety violations
  • Failed to provide protective equipment
  • Refused to fix hazardous workplace conditions
  • Concealed known dangers from employees

If you or a loved one has suffered an industrial injury, seeking legal representation is crucial to ensuring you receive the maximum compensation available under Texas law.

Personal Injury Team

How an Experienced Industrial Injury Attorney Can Help

If you have been injured or a loved one killed in an industrial accident, it’s important to contact an experienced Texas industrial accident as soon as possible. A skilled industrial injury attorney will:

  • Investigate the accident and determine liability
  • Collect crucial evidence, including OSHA reports and medical records
  • Negotiate with insurance companies for fair compensation
  • File a lawsuit if necessary and represent you in court
  • Fight to ensure you receive maximum compensation

Speak to a Texas Industrial Injury Attorney Today

If you or a loved one has suffered a serious industrial injury, do not wait. Time is critical in these cases, and evidence can disappear quickly. Varghese Summersett has the experience and resources to take on major industrial corporations and fight for the justice you deserve. Call (817) 203-2220 or contact us online for a free consultation. If we take your case, we will work on contingency, which means you will never pay anything upfront or out-of-pocket. We only get paid after we recover compensation for you.

CTA: Our personal injury lawyer will make sure you are not suffering in silence.

Varghese Summersett

On February 3, 2025, a Tarrant County jury acquitted a Fort Worth man accused of murder in the fatal stabbing of his friend, finding he acted in self-defense.

Jurors in Judge Lee Gabriel’s court deliberated less than three hours before clearing Juan Ramos Escamilla of all charges related to the death of his friend, Augustine Pineda. The defense team of Kara Carreras , Christy Jack, and Audrey Hatcher argued that Escamilla was acting in self-defense when Pineda was stabbed.

Defendant hugging ChristyJack after the Not Guilty Verdict“This case is a heartbreaking reminder of how quickly chaos can escalate into tragedy,” Carreras said. “Juan was forced to defend himself, his wife, and her friends in a moment of fear and confusion during an argument with his friend.”

On July 31, 2023, police responded to a stabbing call just before 3 a.m. at Escamilla’s house in the 4500 block of Merida Avenue. When they arrived, they found Pineda had been stabbed one time in the abdomen. Escamilla was arrested at the scene.

During the trial, 43-year-old Escamilla testified in his own defense. He told the jury that during a gathering at his home, Pineda became increasingly drunk, aggressive, and violent. 

A physical altercation ensued outside between Pineda and several females, including Escamilla’s wife. Escamilla intervened to protect himself and his wife and, when Pineda lunged at him, Escamilla stabbed him one time with his pocketknife.  He died later at an area hospital.

“Everyone has the right to defend themselves and those they love,” Jack said. “This was a classic case of self-defense and I’m grateful the jury agreed.”

Christy Jack Quote _ Self Defense Murder Trial

Varghese Summersett

There was a record number of Houston traffic deaths last year, solidifying the city’s reputation as one of the most dangerous places in the nation for drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. According to a recent article in the Houston Chronicle , 345 people died on city streets in 2024 – an alarming 15 percent increase from the year before.

This is not just a statistic—it’s a crisis. Every one of these deaths represents a family left devastated, a community left mourning, and possibly a preventable tragedy that should have never happened. If someone you love has been killed on a Houston-area street, it’s imperative to contact an experienced Houston personal injury attorney as soon as possible.

In this article, our wrongful death attorneys discuss the primary causes of Houston traffic deaths, including pedestrian accidents, who can be held liable, and what family members should do to seek justice and compensation when tragedy strikes. But first, please watch this video by Ty Stimpson, who leads Varghese Summersett’s personal injury team.

Common Causes of Houston Traffic Deaths

Houston’s roads have become increasingly deadly, with a record number of traffic fatalities reported in 2024. Understanding the root causes of these tragedies is critical to preventing future accidents and holding negligent parties accountable. The most common causes of Houston traffic deaths include:

1. Drunk and Impaired Driving
Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs continues to be one of the leading causes of fatal crashes in Houston. Impaired drivers have reduced reaction times, impaired judgment, and an increased likelihood of making deadly mistakes behind the wheel.

2. Speeding and Reckless Driving
Excessive speed is a major factor in fatal accidents, as it reduces a driver’s ability to react to sudden hazards and increases the severity of collisions. Reckless driving, such as aggressive lane changes, tailgating, and street racing, also contributes to the rising death toll.

3. Distracted Driving
With smartphones, in-car entertainment systems, and other distractions, many drivers are not fully focused on the road. Texting, talking on the phone, and even adjusting GPS settings can take a driver’s attention away for just a few seconds—often with deadly consequences.

4. Poor Road Conditions and Infrastructure Issues
Houston’s rapid growth has led to congested highways, poorly designed intersections, and dangerous pedestrian crossings. Inadequate lighting, potholes, and missing or unclear traffic signs also play a role in fatal accidents.

5. Pedestrian and Cyclist Vulnerability
Houston has long struggled with pedestrian safety. Many areas lack proper crosswalks, sidewalks, or bike lanes, forcing pedestrians and cyclists to navigate dangerous roadways. Drivers who fail to yield or watch for non-motorists contribute to the rising number of pedestrian and bicycle fatalities.

6. Running Red Lights and Stop Signs
Intersections are among the most dangerous places on Houston roads. Many fatal crashes occur when drivers run red lights, ignore stop signs, or fail to yield the right of way—often at high speeds.

7. Weather-Related Crashes
Houston’s unpredictable weather, including heavy rain and flash flooding, makes driving conditions hazardous. Many drivers fail to adjust their speed for wet or slick roads, leading to hydroplaning and loss of control.

8. Drowsy Driving
Fatigue-related crashes are on the rise, particularly among truck drivers and shift workers. A drowsy driver’s impairment can be just as dangerous as a drunk driver’s, with slowed reaction times and an increased risk of falling asleep behind the wheel.

9. Failure to Wear Seatbelts
Seatbelts save lives, but many fatal crashes in Houston involve passengers who were unrestrained. Not wearing a seatbelt significantly increases the likelihood of severe injury or death in a crash.

As Houston continues to grow, so does the risk on its roads. While many of these accidents could have been prevented, those responsible must be held accountable. If your loved one has been killed in a Houston traffic accident, an experienced personal injury attorney can help you pursue justice and compensation.

Houston Pedestrian Fatalities

Houston Pedestrian Fatalities

In 2024, Houston experienced a significant increase in pedestrian fatalities, with 119 pedestrians losing their lives on city streets—a substantial portion of the 345 total traffic deaths that year. Notably, more than half of these pedestrian fatalities occurred on roads with speed limits of 45 mph or higher, and 44 pedestrians died on Houston interstates, surpassing the 43 driver fatalities in the same areas.

Several factors contribute to the high rate of pedestrian fatalities in Houston:

  1. High-Speed Roadways: Many pedestrian deaths occur on high-speed roads where crossing safely is challenging due to fast-moving traffic.
  2. Infrastructure Deficiencies: The absence of adequate crosswalks, sidewalks, and pedestrian signals forces individuals to navigate dangerous areas without proper safety measures.
  3. Driver Negligence: Incidents of drivers failing to yield, speeding, or driving distractedly significantly increase the risk to pedestrians.
  4. Limited Lighting: Poorly lit streets make pedestrians less visible to drivers, especially during nighttime hours.

In response to the rising number of pedestrian fatalities, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) launched the “Be Safe. Drive Smart” campaign in October 2024. This initiative aims to encourage drivers to slow down and remain vigilant for pedestrians, particularly during months with reduced daylight.

Despite these efforts, pedestrian fatalities remain a critical concern in Houston. If someone you love has been killed in a pedestrian accident, it’s essential to consult with an experienced Houston personal injury attorney to explore your legal options and seek justice for your loss. We offer free, no-pressure consultations. We also work on contingency, which means you only pay after we win your case. You will never pay anything upfront or out-of-pocket.

Compensation in Wrongful Death Cases

Legal Options for Victims and Families

When a loved one is killed traffic accident due to someone’s negligence, families have legal options to seek justice and compensation. At Varghese Summersett, our Houston personal injury attorneys fight for victims and their families in cases involving negligent drivers, unsafe road conditions, and corporate liability. Understanding the available legal avenues is crucial for ensuring accountability and financial relief during an incredibly difficult time.

Wrongful Death Claims in Houston Traffic Fatalities

Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code §71.002, certain family members—including the spouse, children, or parents of the deceased—can file a wrongful death lawsuit against the party responsible for the fatal accident. A wrongful death claim seeks to compensate surviving family members for their profound loss. Potential damages may include:

  • Funeral and burial expenses
  • Lost financial support and income that the deceased would have provided
  • Loss of companionship and emotional support
  • Emotional pain and suffering endured by surviving family members

These claims are designed to hold negligent drivers, government agencies, and corporations accountable when their actions or inaction result in tragic and preventable fatalities.

negligence

Elements Required to Prove a Wrongful Death Claim in a Houston Traffic Death

To successfully pursue a wrongful death claim, the following four key elements must be established:

Duty of Care – The defendant (such as a negligent driver, trucking company, or government agency) had a duty to operate their vehicle or maintain the roadway in a safe and responsible manner.

Breach of Duty – The defendant failed to uphold this duty by acting negligently or recklessly, such as by speeding, running a red light, driving under the influence, or failing to provide safe pedestrian crossings.

Causation – The defendant’s actions or negligence directly caused the fatal accident. This may require evidence such as police reports, witness statements, and accident reconstruction analysis.

Damages – The family has suffered significant losses, including financial hardship, emotional distress, and other damages as a result of their loved one’s death.

Proving these elements requires thorough investigation, expert testimony, and a strong legal strategy, which is why having an experienced Houston wrongful death attorney is essential.

Survival Claims in Houston Traffic Fatalities

In addition to a wrongful death claim, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code §71.021 allows the victim’s estate to file a survival claim. Unlike wrongful death claims, which compensate surviving family members, a survival claim seeks damages on behalf of the deceased for losses they suffered before passing away.

These damages may include:

  • Medical expenses incurred before death
  • Pain and suffering endured before passing
  • Lost wages if the victim survived for a period after the accident but later succumbed to their injuries

Survival claims ensure that the at-fault party is held accountable for all consequences of their actions, even if the victim did not pass away immediately.

Third-Party Liability in Houston Traffic Deaths

While many wrongful death cases focus on individual drivers, third parties may also bear responsibility for a fatal accident. Potential third-party claims include:

  • Commercial or trucking companies – If a negligent truck driver caused the crash while working, their employer may be liable.
  • Bars or establishments – Under Texas Dram Shop laws, businesses that over-serve alcohol to an already intoxicated person who then causes a fatal crash may be held responsible.
  • Government agencies – If unsafe road conditions, poor traffic control, or a failure to maintain roadways contributed to the accident, the city or state could be liable.
  • Auto manufacturers – If a vehicle defect, such as faulty brakes or airbag failure, played a role in the crash, the manufacturer may be legally responsible.

Identifying all responsible parties is crucial to maximizing compensation and ensuring full accountability.

Wrongful Death: What to Do If Your Loved One Was Killed

What to Do If Your Loved One Was Killed in a Houston Traffic Accident

Losing a loved one in a sudden traffic accident is heartbreaking, and the emotional toll can be overwhelming. While no amount of compensation can bring them back, taking the right legal steps can help protect your family’s future and ensure those responsible are held accountable. If your loved one was killed in a Houston traffic accident, here’s what steps to take:

  1. Obtain a Copy of the Police Report – This document is essential for understanding the details of the accident, including statements from witnesses and any citations issued to the at-fault party.
  2. Preserve Evidence – If possible, collect photos and videos of the accident scene, vehicle damage, road conditions, and any other relevant factors. Surveillance footage, dashcam recordings, and 911 call logs can also provide critical evidence.
  3. Identify Witnesses – Witness testimony can be crucial in determining fault and strengthening your claim. If anyone saw the accident happen, try to get their contact information.
  4. Consult an Experienced wrongful death Attorney – A skilled Houston wrongful death lawyer will handle every aspect of your case, from investigating the accident to negotiating with insurance companies and pursuing legal action if necessary. They will work tirelessly to secure the compensation your family deserves.
  5. Don’t Speak with Insurance Adjusters Without Legal Representation – Insurance companies often attempt to minimize payouts or shift blame. Let your attorney handle all communications to ensure your rights are protected.
  6. Take Action Quickly – Texas law imposes a strict two-year statute of limitations on wrongful death claims. Failing to act within this timeframe could jeopardize your ability to recover compensation.

Navigating a wrongful death claim can be complex, but you don’t have to go through it alone. Contact our Houston wrongful death attorneys today for a free consultation. We will guide you through the legal process and fight for justice on behalf of your loved one.

Get the Justice Your Loved One Deserves – Contact Us Today

Losing a loved one in a preventable traffic accident is devastating, but you don’t have to face this fight alone. At Varghese Summersett, our compassionate and experienced wrongful death attorneys will stand by your side, guide you through the process, and pursue the justice and compensation you deserve for the death of your loved one.

Call us today for a free, no-obligation consultation. We will thoroughly evaluate your case, explain your legal options, and take immediate action to hold the responsible parties accountable. Your family’s future matters—let us help you protect it.

Houston Traffic Deaths Hit Record High | Wrongful Death Lawyers

Varghese Summersett

On February 4, 2025, a Tarrant County jury acquitted a Fort Worth man accused of murder in the fatal stabbing of his friend, finding he acted in self-defense.

Jurors in Judge Lee Gabriel’s court deliberated less than three hours before clearing Juan Ramos Escamilla of all charges related to the death of his friend, Augustine Pineda. The defense team of Kara Carreras , Christy Jack, and Audrey Hatcher argued that Escamilla was acting in self-defense when Pineda was stabbed.

“This case is a heartbreaking reminder of how quickly chaos can escalate into tragedy,” Carreras said. “Juan was forced to defend himself, his wife, and her friends in a moment of fear and confusion during an argument with his friend.”

On July 31, 2023, police responded to a stabbing call just before 3 a.m. at Escamilla’s house in the 4500 block of Merida Avenue. When they arrived, they found Pineda had been stabbed one time in the abdomen. Escamilla was arrested at the scene.

Defendant hugging ChristyJack after the Not Guilty VerdictDuring the trial, 43-year-old Escamilla testified in his own defense. He told the jury that during a gathering at his home, Pineda became increasingly drunk, aggressive, and violent. 

A physical altercation ensued outside between Pineda and several females, including Escamilla’s wife. Escamilla intervened to protect himself and his wife and, when Pineda lunged at him, Escamilla stabbed him one time with his pocketknife.  He died later at an area hospital.

“Everyone has the right to defend themselves and those they love,” Jack said. “This was a classic case of self-defense and I’m grateful the jury agreed.”

Varghese Summersett

Tom Welling, the 47-year-old actor best known for portraying Clark Kent in the Superman prequel series Smallville , was recently arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) in Yreka, California. The arrest took place just after midnight on January 26, 2025, in an Arby’s parking lot.

The case raises an interesting legal question that frequently comes up in DWI cases at our Texas criminal defense firm: If Welling was parked when officers found him, could he still be considered “driving” for the purposes of a DUI arrest?

While his case will be handled under California law, we’ll explore how a similar scenario might play out in Texas. In Texas, the term “Driving While Intoxicated” (DWI) can be misleading—because a person doesn’t actually have to be driving to be charged. Instead, the law focuses on whether the individual was operating a vehicle.

In this article, the criminal defense attorneys at Varghese Summersett break down what constitutes the operation of a vehicle under Texas law, how it applies to DWI cases, and whether someone in Welling’s situation could face similar charges in the Lone Star State.

We’ll be watching to see how the Smallville Star’s DUI arrest unfolds in California.

operation of a vehicle

Operation of a Vehicle in Texas DWI Cases

When most people think of Driving While Intoxicated in Texas , they imagine someone behind the wheel, actively driving. However, the term “DWI” is somewhat of a misnomer. A person does not actually have to be driving a vehicle to be charged with DWI in Texas. Instead, they must be operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The legal elements of a DWI charge in Texas are:

  • The defendant;
  • On or about a particular date;
  • Operated;
  • A motor vehicle;
  • In a public place;
  • While intoxicated.

Notably, “driving” is not one of the required elements. Instead, a prosecutor must prove that the person was operating the vehicle. This is why prosecutors often emphasize “putting the defendant behind the wheel.” With serious consequences on the line, securing the best possible legal defense is critical if you have been accused of DWI where operation is an issue.

Would Have Been Arrested In Texas?

Smallville Star’s DUI Arrest: Would it Have Happened in Texas?

If the Smallville Star’s DUI arrest had happened in Texas instead of California, the legal outcome could have been different, but it’s also likely he would have been arrested here, as well. Several factors could influence whether he would face a DWI charge in the Lone Star State, including:

    • Was the car running? If the engine was on, even if he was parked, it could be considered operation.
    • Was he in the driver’s seat? Sitting in the driver’s seat, especially with the car on, increases the likelihood of an operation finding.
    • Were his hands on the wheel? Any physical interaction with the vehicle’s controls could support an argument for operation.
    • Did he admit to driving? Statements like “I was just driving here” or “I was about to leave” could be used as evidence of operation.
    • Was there other circumstantial evidence: If the car was in an unusual position – partially on the curb or in a drive-thru lane – it could indicate the vehicle had been recently operated.

In Texas, if an officer determines there is enough evidence that Welling operated his vehicle while intoxicated, he could be arrested and charged with DWI—even if he was parked when found. It’s important to note that, at this time, not a lot of information has been revealed regarding the Smallville Star’s DUI arrest. It will be interesting to see how the prosecution plays out.

Arrest for DWI for Sleeping in Car?

Can You Avoid a DWI in Texas by Sleeping in Your Car?

Short Answer:
If you do anything beyond turning on the car for heat or air conditioning—such as putting it in gear, stepping on the brake, or moving it—you risk being arrested for DWI.

Longer Answer:
Each case is unique. Courts assess the totality of the circumstances, meaning they will look at all factors surrounding the situation. No published Texas case establishes that simply being inside a running vehicle is enough to prove operation. However, if there is at least one additional “operation fact,” a jury may find that the person operated the vehicle.

Texas DWI vs. California DUI

How Texas DWI Laws Differ from California DUI Laws

While both Texas and California have laws prohibiting driving under the influence, there are key differences in how each state defines and prosecutes these offenses. The Smallville Star’s DUI arrest highlights these legal distinctions.

1. Terminology: DWI vs. DUI

– Texas: The offense is called Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), and it applies to both alcohol and drug impairment.
– California: The term Driving Under the Influence (DUI) is used, covering impairment from alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both.

2. Definition of “Driving” and “Operation”

– Texas: A person does not need to be actively driving to be charged with DWI. Instead, the law focuses on whether they were operating the vehicle. Courts have broadly interpreted operation to mean taking any action that could make the vehicle move, such as having the engine running while in the driver’s seat.
– California: The law requires a person to have been driving the vehicle. Simply being in a parked car while intoxicated is not always enough for a DUI charge.

3. Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Limits
Both states have a standard 0.08% BAC limit for most drivers.
– Texas: Has a stricter zero-tolerance policy for drivers under 21, meaning any detectable alcohol can result in a charge.
– California: It also has a zero-tolerance law for underage drivers but allows for slightly more discretion in enforcement.

4. Field Sobriety and Chemical Testing Laws

– Texas: Has implied consent laws, meaning that refusing a breath or blood test results in an automatic license suspension. However, officers typically need a warrant to draw blood unless there are exigent circumstances.
– California: Also has implied consent laws, but a person can refuse a preliminary breath test without penalty. After arrest, refusal results in license suspension and enhanced penalties.

5. Penalties and Consequences

– Texas: DWI penalities increase with prior offenses and aggravating factors. Even a first offense can lead to a license suspension, fines and possible jail time. Texas also has a 72-hour mandatory jail time for a first offense if a person has a BAC of .15 or higher.
– California: First time DUI offenders may face a license suspension, fines, and mandatory DUI education programs. Jail time is possibly avoidable with probation or alternative sentencing.


6. Can You Get a DUI/DWI While Parked?

– Texas: If a person is in a parked car but is found to be “operating” it in some way (e.g., engine running, foot on the brake), they can be charged with DWI.
– California: Being in a parked car may not automatically result in a DUI; prosecutors typically need additional evidence, such as an admission of driving. It remains to be seen what the evidence is in the Smallville Star’s DUI arrest.

Bottom Line:
Texas law is generally broader in its interpretation of operation, making it easier to charge someone with DWI even if they were not actively driving. In contrast, California’s DUI laws typically require stronger evidence that a person was in control of the vehicle with the intent to drive.

Protect Yourself Against DWI Charges

The Smallville Star’s DUI arrest serves as a reminder of how serious impaired driving charges can be, no matter the state. Texas law is strict when it comes to DWI offenses, and the concept of operation can be broadly interpreted.

At Varghese Summersett, our experienced DWI attorneys understand the nuances of Texas law and have a proven track record of defending clients against DWI charges. If you have been arrested for an intoxication offense, call us today  at 817-203-2220 to discuss your case and find out how we can help. Your future is too important to leave to chance.

The best criminal defense lawyers don't let a single moment define your life.

Varghese Summersett

Divorce with Dignity in Texas

Divorce can be emotionally and financially draining, but it doesn’t have to be a battlefield. Collaborative divorce offers a structured, private, and solution-oriented process for couples who want to part ways without unnecessary conflict. Unlike a traditional litigated divorce, collaborative divorce focuses on cooperation, preserving dignity, and keeping the control in the hands of the divorcing couple—not a judge.

At Varghese Summersett, we guide individuals through collaborative divorce with precision, skill, and a commitment to achieving the best possible outcome. Here are the top eight reasons for a collaborative divorce in Texas but first, here is a quick overview of collaborative law .

What is Collaborative Law in Texas?

Collaborative law in Texas is governed by Chapter 15 of the Texas Family Code, which establishes the legal framework for resolving family law disputes through a cooperative, non-adversarial process. This approach is designed to help divorcing couples reach a mutually beneficial settlement while avoiding the stress, expense, and uncertainty of litigation.

Under Texas law, collaborative divorce requires both spouses to commit to open communication, full financial disclosure, and problem-solving, rather than confrontation. Each party retains a collaboratively trained attorney, and the process may also involve neutral professionals, such as financial experts or mental health professionals, to assist with asset division, parenting plans, and emotional well-being.

Attorneys Nicole Carroll and Brent McMullen

One key feature of collaborative divorce is that all parties, including attorneys, sign an agreement stating that they will not pursue litigation. If the process fails, the attorneys must withdraw, and new legal representation must be obtained for litigation. This ensures that all parties remain committed to reaching an amicable resolution.

At Varghese Summersett, two of our Southlake divorce attorneys  – Nicole Carroll and Brent McMullen – have extensive experience guiding clients through collaborative divorce with efficiency, discretion, and a focus on securing a fair and sustainable outcome. This method allows couples to maintain privacy, minimize conflict, and retain control over their future—without the unpredictability of a court ruling.

8 Reasons for a Collaborative Divorce in Texas

 

Private and confidential

1. Private and Confidential

Unlike a traditional litigated divorce, which involves public court hearings and filings, a collaborative divorce prioritizes privacy. All negotiations take place behind closed doors, and personal matters—such as finances, child custody discussions, and marital disputes—are not made part of the public record.

Texas law requires that divorce proceedings be filed in court, but what is filed can be kept minimal. In a collaborative divorce, sensitive financial and personal details do not need to be disclosed in public hearings or multiple court filings. Instead, both spouses and their attorneys sign a confidentiality agreement, ensuring that discussions and negotiations remain private. For high-net-worth individuals or professionals with reputations to protect, this is a significant advantage and one of the key reasons for a collaborative divorce.

Greater Control Over the Outcome

2. Greater Control Over the Outcome

In a contested divorce, a judge makes the final decision on asset division, child custody, and child support arrangements. These rulings may not align with either party’s preferences, and they often lead to frustration and ongoing legal battles.

One of the major reasons for a collaborative divorce is that it empowers both spouses to craft their own agreement. Instead of relying on the court’s discretion, you and your spouse work together—with the assistance of legal and financial professionals—to develop solutions that align with your specific needs. Whether it’s dividing property, structuring child support, or outlining a parenting plan, you have the power to create a tailored agreement rather than leaving life-altering decisions to the court.

Less Adversarial

3. Less Adversarial

Traditional divorce proceedings are often highly contentious, with each party attempting to gain an advantage over the other. Courtroom battles can fuel resentment, increase stress, and prolong the emotional turmoil of an already difficult situation.

One of the key reasons for a collaborative divorce is that it is designed to reduce conflict and promote cooperation. Instead of adopting a “win-lose” mentality, both parties agree to work toward a mutually beneficial resolution. This approach encourages respectful communication and minimizes hostility—especially important when children are involved.

Protects Children from Conflict

4. Protects Children from Conflict

Divorce is especially hard on children, particularly when they witness their parents engaging in heated disputes. A litigated divorce, with its public courtroom fights and adversarial tactics, can have a lasting emotional impact on kids.

Collaborative divorce prioritizes the well-being of children. Parents work together to create a parenting plan that serves their children’s best interests while avoiding unnecessary conflict. Many collaborative divorce cases involve child specialists who help parents understand how to minimize the negative effects of divorce on their children. By keeping disputes civil and private, children are shielded from the stress and trauma of an acrimonious divorce. This is one of the top reasons for a collaborative divorce.

Faster Resolution

5. Faster Resolution

Texas courts are backlogged with divorce cases, meaning a litigated divorce can drag on for months—or even years. The more contentious the case, the longer it takes to resolve.

A collaborative divorce, on the other hand, follows a structured timeline and avoids unnecessary delays. Instead of waiting for court dates and mandatory hearings, both parties work together to finalize their divorce efficiently. This is particularly beneficial for individuals who want to move forward with their lives as soon as possible.

Professional Support

6. Professional Support

One of the biggest reasons for a collaborative divorce is the ability to bring in a team of professionals to help guide the process. This can include:

  • Financial experts to assist with asset division and tax implications.
  • Child specialists to ensure the best outcome for children.
  • Mental health professionals to facilitate communication and manage emotions.

With a team of professionals involved, both spouses can make informed decisions based on expert guidance rather than emotional reactions.

Customized Solutions

7. Customized Solutions

Texas family law follows a set of default rules when it comes to divorce, property division, and child custody. However, every family’s situation is unique, and a one-size-fits-all approach rarely works.

In a collaborative divorce, couples aren’t bound by rigid legal formulas. Instead, they have the flexibility to create agreements that work specifically for them. Whether it’s structuring a creative co-parenting plan, dividing assets in a non-traditional way, or making special financial arrangements, the collaborative process allows for customized solutions that a judge might not consider in a courtroom setting.

Top 8 Reasons for a Collaborative Divorce in Texas

8. Avoids Unexpected Court Rulings

When you take your divorce to court, you are at the mercy of a judge’s ruling. Judges apply Texas law as they see fit, but their decisions may not reflect the unique circumstances of your marriage, children, or financial situation.

One of the most important reasons for a collaborative divorce is that it eliminates the uncertainty of litigation. You and your spouse retain control over the final agreement, ensuring that decisions are made with your specific needs in mind. This reduces the risk of being blindsided by an unfavorable ruling and promotes long-term satisfaction with the outcome.

Top 8 Reasons for a Collaborative Divorce in Texas

Why Choose Us for Your Collaborative Divorce?

At Varghese Summersett, we understand that divorce is a major life transition, and we are committed to making the process as smooth, private, and efficient as possible. Our experienced North Texas family law attorneys are highly skilled in collaborative divorce, and we work closely with financial experts, child specialists, and mental health professionals to achieve the best possible resolution for our clients.

If you are considering a collaborative divorce in North Texas, our team can guide you through the process with compassion, strategy, and expertise. Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation and learn how we can help you move forward with the next chapter of your life. We handle divorce cases in Fort Worth, Dallas, Southlake, Colleyville, Westlake, Denton, and the surrounding areas. Call 817-203-2220 to schedule a consultation.

Our top divorce lawyers help you divorce with dignity.

Varghese Summersett

Cite and Release is a law enforcement policy where officers can issue citations (similar to traffic tickets) instead of making arrests for certain low-level offenses, requiring the person to appear in court at a later date rather than going to jail immediately.

In other words, individuals can be charged with certain offenses without being arrested or having to bond out of jail. This was established by a 2007 amendment to Article 14.06 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and it applies to qualifying Class A and B misdemeanors.

In this article, the criminal defense attorneys at Varghese Summersett explain Cite and Release in Texas, what offenses qualify for Cite and Release, and what happens after a citation is issued.

Cite & Release_ Legal Authorite and Objectives

Legal Authority & Objectives of Cite and Release

Cite and Release in Texas was introduced nearly two decades ago in an effort to reduce jail overcrowding and the strain on law enforcement while addressing low-level, non-violent offenses.

In 2007, Texas lawmakers amended the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 14.06 (c) and (d), which gave officers the discretion to issue citations instead of making arrests for certain Class A and Class B misdemeanors. The primary objectives of Cite and Release in Texas are to:

  • Reduce jail overcrowding by diverting individuals accused of minor offenses from the jail system.
  • Promote efficiency in the legal process by streamlining procedures and reducing the time and resources required for booking and processing individuals in custody.
  • Allow law enforcement to focus on more serious crimes by prioritizing resources for addressing violent offenses.
  • Minimize disruption to individuals’ lives by avoiding immediate arrest and allowing them to continue their activities until their court appearance.
  • Save taxpayer money and law enforcement resources.
  • Alleviate unnecessary contact with the criminal justice system, which can reduce the likelihood of future offending.
  • Mitigate racial profiling in policing and avoiding the harmful effects of arrests, such as deportation, job loss, and barriers to finding employment and housing.
  • Improve relationships between communities and law enforcement by increasing perceptions of procedural justice.

It’s important to point out that while the law provides the option for Cite and Release, not all jurisdictions in Texas utilize it. Individual counties and municipalities determine whether and how to implement it.

Eligible Offenses for Cite & Release

Eligible Offenses for Cite and Release in Texas

Texas Cite and Release Eligible Offenses
Classification Offense Code Section Details
Class B Marijuana Possession 481.121 2 ounces or less
Class B Synthetic Cannabinoid Possession 481.1161 2 ounces or less
Class B Criminal Mischief 28.03 Damage $100 to less than $750
Class B Graffiti 28.08 Damage less than $750
Class B Theft of Property 31.03 Value $100 to less than $750
Class B Theft of Service 31.04 Value $100 to less than $750
Class B Tampering with Vehicle Tags 37.10 Temporary tags under the Transportation Code
Class B Contraband in Correctional Facility 38.114 When classified as Class B
Class B Driving While License Invalid 521.457 Operating vehicle without valid license
Class A Marijuana Possession 481.121 More than 2 ounces, less than 4 ounces
Class A Synthetic Cannabinoid Possession 481.1161 More than 2 ounces, less than 4 ounces
Class A Graffiti 28.08 Damage $750 to less than $2,500

Individual Eligibility for Cite & Release in Texs

Individual Eligibility for Cite and Release

Even if someone is accused of committing an offense eligible for cite and release, not everyone will avoid arrest. For example, some jurisdictions set rule like:

  1. Be a resident of the county where the offense was allegedly committed.
  2. Not have outstanding warrants.
  3. Not be suspected of committing another offense that is not eligible for Cite and Release.
  4. Not be intoxicated to a level that police determine presents a danger to themselves or others.

It’s important to point out that even if an offense is eligible, law enforcement still has the discretion to decide whether to use Cite and Release or make an arrest based on the specific circumstances of the situation.

Texas Cities & Counties With Cite & Release

Texas Counties & Cities with Cite and Release Policies

Cite and Release policies in Texas have been implemented unevenly across the state since their introduction in 2007. Some cities and counties have it – and some don’t. Here are some Texas counties and cities that have implemented Cite and Release policies:

Counties

  • Harris County
  • Bexar County
  • Nueces County
  • Tarrant County
  • Travis County
  • Hays County

Cities

  • Austin
  • San Marcos
  • Dallas
  • El Paso
  • Houston
  • San Antonio

It’s important to note that while these jurisdictions have Cite and Release policies, the implementation and scope may vary. For example, some cities have limited their police to marijuana possession only. Other counties, like Bexar and Harris, have robust Cite and Release programs.

Cite & Releass: What Happens Next?

What Happens After a Cite & Release Ticket is Issued?

After a Cite and Release ticket is issued, the following steps typically occur:

    1. The individual receives a citation with written instructions to appear in court at a future date.
    2. The person is released from custody and allowed to continue their activities until their court appearance.
    3. On the specified court date, the individual must appear to address the charges against them.
    4. At the court appearance, the judge will decide how to proceed with the case. This may include:
      – Offering bail
      – Releasing the defendant on their own recognizance
      – Refusing to grant bail (in rare cases)
    5. If the individual fails to appear in court as instructed, additional legal consequences may result.
    6. The criminal case proceeds as normal, meaning the person will still need to:
      – Appear in court as required
      – Obtain legal representation
      – Pay court costs and other fines, if applicable

Some jurisdictions have special dockets for Cite and Release in Texas. In Tarrant County, for example, the Cite and Release court is held on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month at 2 p.m. in Trial Room D in the Tim Curry Justice Center.

A person who has received a Cite and Release citation will appear in court on their specified date, where they will be fingerprinted, complete a financial questionnaire, be advised of their rights, and have the opportunity to request a court-appointed attorney if they can’t afford one.

It’s important to note that even though Cite and Release in Texas allows a person to avoid immediate custody, the legal process continues, and the charges are not dismissed simply because of the citation. The citation is essentially a promise to appear in court, and failing to do so can lead to further legal issues.

Do You Need an Attorney for Cite & Release

Do You Need an Attorney for Cite & Release Citation?

While a Cite and Release citation may seem less serious than an arrest, it is still a criminal charge that requires careful attention. Even if you are not taken to jail, you must appear in court to address the offense. Without proper legal representation, you could face significant consequences, including fines, a permanent criminal record, or even jail time if the case escalates.

An experienced criminal defense attorney will:

  • Protect Your Rights: Ensure your case is handled fairly and lawfully.
  • Advocate for Dismissal or Reduced Penalties: Work to minimize the impact on your life.
  • Navigate the Legal Process: Explain the legal system and guide you through court appearances and settings until a resolution is reached.

If you’ve received a Cite and Release citation, consulting with a skilled defense attorney is crucial to protect your future. We can help. Call Varghese Summersett at 817-203-2220.

Criminal Defense Team

Receive a Cite and Release Ticket? Contact Us.

Cite and release represents a significant evolution in Texas criminal justice administration. While implementation varies, the program demonstrates measurable benefits in system efficiency, resource allocation, and equitable outcomes.

If you or a loved one has received a Cite and Release Ticket in Tarrant, Dallas, or Harris Counties, contact Varghese Summersett today to speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney. Our team understands the Cite and Release process and will work to achieve the best possible outcome. Don’t let a citation jeopardize your future — contact Varghese Summersett today at 817-203-2220.

being proactive in criminal defense

Varghese Summersett

Electric semi-trucks are gaining popularity and being increasingly adopted by major companies for various uses, including long-distance hauling and local food and beverage delivery. The shift toward electric trucks is driven by the need for more sustainable transportation solutions and the growing pressure to reduce carbon emissions from the trucking industry.

With advancements in technology, however, there are also risks and dangers, such as battery fires, software failures, and reduced maneuverability due to their heavier design. These issues can lead to catastrophic accidents, putting drivers, passengers, and other road users at serious risk.

If you or someone you love has been seriously injured or killed in an electric semi-truck accident in Texas, you may entitled to substantial compensation from the truck driver, manufacturer, or a negligent third-party.  In this article, the personal injury lawyers at Varghese Summersett discuss electric semi-truck accidents, who can be held liable, the process for recovering compensation, and how our law firm can help.

What is an Electric Semi Truck

What Is an Electric Semi-Truck?

Electric semi-trucks are commercial vehicles designed to transport goods while being powered entirely by electricity rather than traditional diesel fuel. They are typically 18-wheelers, just like traditional diesel semi-trucks, but use advanced rechargeable battery systems to propel the truck, offering a more environmentally friendly alternative to conventional semi-trucks. By eliminating tailpipe emissions, electric semi-trucks contribute to a cleaner environment and play a crucial role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, advancing the goal of sustainable transportation.

The adoption of electric semi-trucks has been steadily increasing, driven by technological advancements, environmental awareness, and government incentives. In 2024, approximately 13,000 electric semi-trucks were operating on U.S. roads, and this number is expected to rise significantly in the coming years. Federal and state governments have introduced financial incentives, tax credits, and grants to encourage companies to invest in green transportation solutions.

Texas, as a major hub for freight and logistics, has emerged as a key player in this transition. Major metropolitan areas like Houston and Dallas have witnessed a growing adoption of electric semi-trucks, supported by infrastructure developments such as charging stations and incentives tailored to the freight and logistics industry.

Who makes and uses electric semi trucks

The Leading Manufacturers of Electric Semi-Trucks

Several manufacturers are at the forefront of the electric semi-truck movement, offering innovative vehicles designed to meet the demands of modern freight operations. They include:

  • Tesla: Known for groundbreaking electric vehicles, Tesla’s Semi boasts impressive range, high performance, and advanced technology that redefines long-haul trucking.
  • Volvo: With its VNR Electric model, Volvo targets short- and medium-haul freight needs, focusing on urban areas and regional routes.
  • Freightliner: Freightliner’s eCascadia is engineered for regional operations, combining zero-emission technology with reliability.
  • BYD: This global manufacturer is gaining traction in the U.S. market with its electric truck offerings, providing versatile options for various freight applications.

These manufacturers are driving the transition from diesel to electric power, setting the standard for the next generation of commercial vehicles.

Companies Leading the Adoption of Electric Semi-Trucks

Major corporations are not just embracing electric semi-trucks—they are actively integrating them into their operations to meet sustainability goals and reduce their environmental impact. Some key players include:

  • PepsiCo: As an early adopter of the Tesla Semi, PepsiCo is spearheading initiatives to achieve carbon neutrality by 2040 through pilot programs and fleet upgrades.
  • Schneider National: By 2023, Schneider surpassed 1 million miles of zero-emission trucking, utilizing a fleet of Freightliner eCascadia trucks for regional operations.
  • Amazon: The e-commerce giant deployed 50 electric semi-trucks in Southern California in 2024, focusing on reducing emissions in first-mile freight from ocean ports.
  • Penske: Starting in 2022, Penske began incorporating Freightliner eCascadia trucks into its fleet, highlighting its commitment to sustainable logistics solutions.
  • Coca-Cola: In California, Coca-Cola added 20 Freightliner eCascadia trucks to its fleet for short-haul operations at its bottling and distribution facilities.
  • Maersk: The global shipping leader ordered 126 Volvo VNR Electric trucks, showcasing its dedication to green transportation.
  • Walmart: Retail giant Walmart is integrating Tesla Semi trucks into its supply chain to bolster sustainability efforts.

The collective efforts of these manufacturers and corporations underscore a significant shift in the freight and logistics industry, paving the way for widespread adoption of electric semi-trucks and a cleaner, more sustainable future for transportation.

Common Causes of Electrict Semi Accidents

Common Causes of Electric Semi-Truck Accidents

While electric semi-trucks are touted for their safety features, accidents can and do occur. Common causes include:

  • Battery Failures or Fires
    Electric vehicles rely on lithium-ion batteries, which, while efficient, can pose fire risks if damaged in a collision. Battery malfunctions can also lead to sudden power losses.
  • Software or Autonomous Driving Errors
    Many electric semi-trucks are equipped with advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). Software glitches or improper use of these systems can result in accidents. For example, Tesla’s Autopilot feature has been scrutinized in several accidents involving electric vehicles.
  • Driver Fatigue or Error
    Just like traditional semi-truck drivers, electric semi-truck operators are susceptible to fatigue or distracted driving, leading to accidents. Federal regulations, such as the Hours of Service (HOS) rules, aim to prevent this, but violations still occur.
  • Inadequate Maintenance
    Electric semi-trucks require specialized maintenance. Improper upkeep of brakes, tires, or electrical components can lead to mechanical failures.
  • Environmental Factors
    Adverse weather conditions, such as heavy rain or ice, can affect the performance of electric semi-trucks. Their heavier weight, due to large battery packs, may increase stopping distances and affect handling.

Determining Liability in Electric Semi Accidents

Determining Liability for Electric Semi-Truck Accidents

Determining liability in an electric semi-truck accident can be a complicated process, often involving multiple parties. Here’s a breakdown of the potentially responsible entities and how their actions may contribute to fault:

1. The Truck Driver

Truck drivers can be held liable if their negligence directly leads to an accident. Examples of driver negligence include:

  • Distracted driving, such as texting or using a mobile device while operating the vehicle
  • Speeding or engaging in reckless driving behaviors
  • Driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol

However, drivers may not always bear full responsibility. For instance, if mechanical failures or other external factors contributed to the accident, their liability may be mitigated.

2. The Trucking Company

Trucking companies are responsible for ensuring the safety and reliability of their fleet and drivers. Liability may arise if the company:

  • Fails to properly train drivers on the operation and unique challenges of electric semi-trucks
  • Neglects to enforce safety regulations or monitor compliance
  • Does not perform regular maintenance on vehicles

Some trucking companies outsource maintenance, further complicating liability. According to industry reports, third-party providers accounted for approximately 18% of total fleet maintenance costs in recent years. If outsourced maintenance is substandard, both the trucking company and the service provider could share liability.

3. The Manufacturer

Manufacturers of electric semi-trucks can be held liable under product liability laws, including the Texas Products Liability Act, if accidents result from:

  • Design defects: Flaws in the vehicle’s design, such as unsafe battery placement or poor weight distribution
  • Software issues: Malfunctions in autonomous driving systems or other safety features
  • Battery defects: Faulty or improperly manufactured battery components that lead to fires or power failures

Manufacturers have a legal obligation to produce vehicles that are safe for their intended use. Failure to meet this standard can result in liability for accidents.

4. Third-Party Maintenance Providers

Independent maintenance companies or mechanics can also be held responsible if their negligence causes or contributes to an accident. This could include:

  • Improperly performed repairs that fail to resolve critical safety issues
  • Failure to identify or address mechanical problems during routine inspections
  • Use of substandard or salvaged parts without proper verification

Trucking companies that rely heavily on third-party maintenance providers may face additional scrutiny in determining shared liability.

5. Other Drivers

In multi-vehicle accidents, the negligence of other drivers may also play a role. Examples include:

  • Sudden lane changes or unsafe driving around an electric semi-truck
  • Failing to yield or abide by traffic laws, leading to chain-reaction collisions

The Role of Technological Complexity in Liability

Electric semi-trucks introduce advanced technologies that can complicate the determination of liability:

  • Software Defects: Autonomous driving systems and safety features may fail due to glitches or improper over-the-air updates.
  • Hardware Issues: Electrical system malfunctions or battery defects can cause sudden power losses or fires.
  • Data Challenges: Proving liability may require analyzing black box data, over-the-air software updates, and diagnostic logs, which can be technically complex. 

Multiple Party Liability

In many cases, multiple parties may share liability for an accident. For example, a defective component may have contributed to the accident, but the driver’s negligence may have exacerbated the situation. In such cases, each party may be assigned a percentage of fault. This is governed by the modified comparative fault rule, which allows a plaintiff to recover damages as long as they are less than 51% at fault.

Determining liability in electric semi-truck accidents requires a thorough investigation and often involves complex legal and technical considerations. As the technology continues to evolve, so too will the legal landscape surrounding these cases. At Varghese Summersett, our personal injury attorneys work closely with industry experts to uncover the root causes of accidents, identify responsible parties, and help victims pursue the compensation they deserve.

Electric Semi-Truck vs. Traditional Semi-Truck Accidents

Electric Semi Truck vs. Traditional Semi-Truck Accidents

Electric semi-truck and traditional semi-truck accidents share common causes like driver fatigue, environmental factors, or human error. However, electric semi-trucks introduce unique risks due to their technology and design. Here are the key differences:

  • Battery-related risks: Electric semi-trucks can experience battery failures or fires, which pose unique hazards. Lithium-ion batteries can ignite if damaged in a collision, leading to intense fires that are challenging to extinguish.
  • Software and autonomous driving errors: Electric semi-trucks often incorporate advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous features. Glitches or improper use of these systems can cause accidents specific to electric vehicles.
  • Specialized maintenance: Electric semi-trucks require different maintenance procedures compared to traditional trucks. Improper upkeep of electrical components can lead to mechanical failures unique to electric vehicles.
  • Weight distribution: Electric semi-trucks are typically heavier due to large battery packs, which can affect their handling and stopping distances, especially in adverse weather conditions.
  • Power loss risks: Electric trucks may experience sudden power losses due to battery malfunctions, a risk not present in traditional diesel-powered trucks.
  • Quieter operation: Electric semi-trucks are significantly quieter than their diesel counterparts, which can potentially lead to accidents if pedestrians or other drivers fail to hear them approaching.

While both types of trucks can experience common accident causes like driver fatigue or environmental factors, the technological complexity of electric semi-trucks introduces new potential failure points and accident scenarios.

Regulations for Electric Semi-Trucks

 

Regulations for Electric Semi-Trucks in Texas

Electric semi-truck drivers in Texas follow the same core regulations as traditional truck drivers but there is an exception in regard to weight limits:

  • Weight Limits
    As of September 1, 2023, electric trucks can weigh up to 82,000 pounds—2,000 pounds more than the standard limit for diesel trucks. This aligns with federal exemptions for electric and natural gas-powered trucks.
  • Standard Rules Applicable to All Semi-Trucks
    • Hours of Service (HOS): Regulations limiting driving hours to reduce fatigue.
    • Commercial Driver’s License (CDL): Required for all semi-truck operators.
    • Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Mandate: Tracks driving hours for compliance with HOS rules.
    • Vehicle Equipment and Safety Standards: Applies equally to both electric and diesel trucks.

While electric and traditional semi-trucks share many regulatory requirements, electric semi-trucks introduce new risks and complexities due to their technology and design. Drivers and fleet operators must remain vigilant about these differences to ensure safety and compliance.

Types of Compensation

Types of Compensation for Electric Semi-Truck Accidents

Victims of electric semi-truck accidents may be entitled to various forms of compensation under Texas law. These include:

1. Economic Damages

Medical expenses: Emergency care, surgeries, physical therapy, and medication.
Lost wages: Compensation for time missed from work.
Property damage: Costs to repair or replace your vehicle.

2. Non-Economic Damages

Pain and suffering: Physical and emotional distress caused by the accident.
Loss of consortium: Damages for the loss of companionship or affection.

3. Punitive Damages

In cases of gross negligence, such as a trucking company knowingly operating unsafe vehicles, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar behavior.

What to Do if You’ve Been Injured in an Electric Semi-Truck Accident in Texas

If you’ve been injured in an electric semi-truck accident in Texas, you will follow the same steps as you would if you were involved in an accident with any other vehicle. They include:

  • Seek Immediate Medical Attention: Your health is the top priority. Even if injuries seem minor, get evaluated to document any potential issues.
  • Document the Scene: Take photos of the vehicles, road conditions, and any visible injuries. Collect contact information from witnesses.
  • Contact Law Enforcement: File a police report, which will be crucial for insurance claims and legal proceedings.
  • Preserve Evidence: Keep medical records, repair estimates, and any correspondence with insurance companies.
  • Consult a Texas Electric Semi-Truck Accident Lawyer: An experienced persona injury attorney can help you navigate the complexities of your case, deal with insurance adjusters, and pursue the compensation you deserv

Personal Injury Team

Speak to a Texas Electric Semi-Truck Accident Lawyer

Electric semi-truck accidents require specialized legal knowledge due to the unique factors involved, such as advanced technology and evolving regulations. At Varghese Summersett, we have extensive experience handling complex truck accident cases, including those involving electric vehicles.

Contact us today for a free consultation. If we take your case, you will never pay us anything upfront or out-of-pocket. We work on contingency, which means we only get paid after you get paid. Rest assured,  our team will work tirelessly to secure the compensation you deserve to move forward with your life.

Hire our personal injury attorneys who do not settle for less.