News
 
Varghese Summersett

When a vehicle crashes into a home or building in Texas, the driver is usually liable, but other parties may share fault, including the driver’s employer, the vehicle owner, the property owner, or even a manufacturer, depending on the circumstances of the wreck. Identifying every responsible party is the key to maximizing your compensation.

Crashes into buildings happen far more often than most people realize. They can cause catastrophic injuries, massive property damage, and lasting trauma. If you or a loved one were inside a building when a vehicle struck it, Texas law gives you the right to pursue damages from every party whose negligence played a role.

Varghese Summersett Legal Team

How Common Are Vehicle-Into-Building Crashes?

More common than you might think. According to the Storefront Safety Council, vehicles crash into commercial buildings roughly 60 times per day across the United States. These incidents cause thousands of injuries and dozens of deaths every year. Homes are struck frequently as well, especially properties on corners, curves, or near high-speed roadways.

In Texas, the volume of traffic, the prevalence of high-speed roads, and urban sprawl make vehicle-into-building accidents an ongoing and serious risk. The Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and Houston metro area are especially vulnerable due to dense commercial corridors and high-speed arterials that run close to storefronts and residential neighborhoods.

You've Seen Us On

Southlake Style
NPR
Fort Worth Report
Court TV
CBS
WFAA
Today Show
PBS News
OxyGen
NBC News
KERA News
Fox News
ABC News
The Washington Post
The New York Times
Dallas Morning News
New York Post
Law and Crime
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Dallas Express
Daily Mail
Crime Online
Fort Worth Business Press
Fort Worth Inc. Magazine
Entrepreneur
D Magazine
Attorney at Law Magazine
Forbes
The Atlantic
Texas Monthly Magazine
Southlake Style
NPR
Fort Worth Report
Court TV
CBS
WFAA
Today Show
PBS News
OxyGen
NBC News
KERA News
Fox News
ABC News
The Washington Post
The New York Times
Dallas Morning News
New York Post
Law and Crime
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Dallas Express
Daily Mail
Crime Online
Fort Worth Business Press
Fort Worth Inc. Magazine
Entrepreneur
D Magazine
Attorney at Law Magazine
Forbes
The Atlantic
Texas Monthly Magazine

Who Is Liable When a Vehicle Crashes Into a Building in Texas?

Who Is Liable When a Vehicle Crashes Into a Building in Texas?

Figuring out who is legally responsible requires a thorough investigation into why the crash happened. Depending on the facts, one or more of the following parties may owe you compensation. We’ve listed them in order of how often they are found at fault in these cases.

1. The Driver

The driver is the most common party at fault in vehicle-into-building crashes. The vast majority of these incidents stem from driver error, including confusing the gas pedal for the brake (especially in parking lots), distracted driving, drunk or drugged driving, excessive speed, falling asleep behind the wheel, or fleeing law enforcement.

If the driver failed to exercise reasonable care, they can be held personally liable for your injuries and property damage. In cases involving intoxication or extreme recklessness, you may also be entitled to punitive damages designed to punish the wrongdoer.

2. Another Driver

In many vehicle-into-building crashes, the driver who struck the building was trying to avoid a collision with a different vehicle. If a second driver’s negligence forced the first driver off the road and into a structure, that second driver may also be liable, even if their car never touched the building.

Hit-and-run scenarios are also common. A fleeing driver causes the crash, then disappears. Witness statements, surveillance footage, and accident reconstruction experts can help identify and hold the at-fault driver accountable.

3. The Driver’s Employer

If the driver was working at the time of the crash, their employer may be vicariously liable under a legal doctrine called respondeat superior. This applies when an employee causes harm while acting in the course and scope of their job. Common examples include delivery drivers for Amazon, FedEx, or UPS, commercial truck operators, rideshare drivers for Uber or Lyft, and employees running work-related errands.

4. The Vehicle Owner

If the person driving was not the owner of the vehicle, the owner may be liable under a theory called negligent entrustment. This applies when someone lends their vehicle to a person they knew (or should have known) was an unsafe driver, such as someone with prior DWI convictions, a suspended license, or a medical condition that impairs their driving ability.

Texas courts have recognized negligent entrustment claims in many cases, and this theory can significantly expand the pool of available compensation.

Don't Suffer in Silence

5. The Property Owner or Business

This is where many people are surprised to learn they may have a claim. If a building has been struck by vehicles before, or if it sits in a location that makes it foreseeably vulnerable to vehicle intrusion (such as at the end of a T-intersection, on a curve, or beside a high-speed road), the property owner may share liability for failing to install protective barriers.

Bollards, concrete barriers, guardrails, and berms exist specifically to prevent vehicles from entering occupied spaces. When a property owner knows or should know about the risk and fails to take reasonable steps, they may be liable for injuries that result. This theory is especially strong for retail storefronts facing parking lots, restaurants with outdoor seating near roadways, gas stations and convenience stores at busy intersections, and buildings that have been hit by vehicles on prior occasions.

6. A Vehicle or Parts Manufacturer

Sometimes the crash is not entirely the driver’s fault. If a mechanical defect contributed to the accident, such as sudden unintended acceleration, brake failure, a stuck throttle, or a steering malfunction, the vehicle manufacturer, parts maker, or even the mechanic who serviced the vehicle may be liable under a product liability theory.

These claims require detailed expert analysis but can dramatically increase the value of a case because manufacturers carry substantial insurance and assets.

What Must You Prove to Recover Compensation?

What Must You Prove to Recover Compensation?

Texas personal injury claims are based on negligence. To recover compensation, you (the plaintiff) must prove four elements by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that each element is true. The burden of proof rests on you, not the defendant.

duty breach causation damages

The four elements are:

Duty: The defendant owed you a duty of care. For drivers, this means operating their vehicle safely. For property owners, this means keeping the premises reasonably safe for occupants. For employers, this includes hiring and supervising competent employees.

Breach: The defendant failed to meet that duty. A driver who runs a red light, a property owner who ignores repeated vehicle strikes without installing barriers, or an employer who hires a driver with multiple DWI convictions all breach their respective duties.

Causation: The defendant’s breach directly caused your injuries. You must show a clear connection between the negligent act and the harm you suffered.

Damages: You suffered actual, measurable losses, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage.

Texas also follows a modified comparative fault rule under Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 33.001 . If you are found to be more than 50 percent at fault for your own injuries, you are barred from recovery. If your fault is 50 percent or less, your damages are reduced by your percentage of responsibility.

Types of Compensation Available

What Compensation Can You Recover?

If you were injured when a vehicle crashed into a building you were in, Texas law allows you to pursue both economic and non-economic damages.

Economic Damages

These cover your measurable financial losses: medical expenses (emergency care, hospitalization, surgery, rehabilitation, and future treatment), lost wages and lost earning capacity, property damage to your home and personal belongings, temporary housing or relocation costs, and other out-of-pocket expenses tied to the accident.

Non-Economic Damages

These compensate you for the human toll of the crash: physical pain and suffering, mental anguish and emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement or physical impairment, and post-traumatic stress disorder or anxiety.

Punitive Damages

When the defendant’s conduct is especially egregious, such as drunk driving or fleeing from police, Texas courts may award exemplary (punitive) damages. These are meant to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar behavior.

Wrongful Death Claims

Vehicle-into-building crashes can be fatal. If you lost a loved one in one of these incidents, Texas law allows surviving spouses, children, and parents to file a wrongful death claim. These claims seek compensation for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support, loss of companionship, and mental anguish.

Get the Compensation You Deserve

What Should You Do After a Vehicle Crashes Into Your Home or Building?

The steps you take right after the incident can make or break your ability to recover compensation. Here is what we recommend.

Get Medical Attention Immediately

Even if you feel fine, get checked out. Adrenaline can mask serious injuries like internal bleeding, concussions, and spinal damage. A prompt medical evaluation also creates a record linking your injuries to the crash.

Call 911 and File a Police Report

Law enforcement should respond and file an official report documenting what happened. This report becomes an important piece of evidence in any claim.

Document Everything

If you are able, take photos and video of the damage to the building, the vehicle, the surrounding area, and your injuries. Collect contact information from the driver, witnesses, and responding officers.

Do Not Give Recorded Statements to Insurance Companies

Insurance adjusters are not on your side. They will look for any opening to minimize or deny your claim. Do not provide recorded statements without first talking to a lawyer.

Talk to a lawyer before you speak to an insurance adjuster. Schedule a free consultation with Varghese Summersett today.

Contact a Personal Injury Attorney

These cases can involve multiple liable parties, overlapping insurance policies, government immunity issues, and complex questions of foreseeability and causation. An experienced personal injury attorney can identify all responsible parties, preserve critical evidence, and build the strongest case on your behalf.

Don't Face This Alone. Call Now

How Do Insurance Policies Apply in These Cases?

Vehicle-into-building cases often involve multiple insurance policies. Understanding which ones apply is essential to maximizing your recovery.

The driver’s auto liability insurance should cover injuries and damage caused by the driver’s negligence. However, many drivers carry only Texas minimum coverage ($30,000 per person/$60,000 per accident), which may be woefully inadequate for the damage caused. Commercial auto policies may apply if the driver was working, and these policies typically carry much higher limits.

The property owner’s commercial general liability insurance may apply if the owner shares fault for failing to protect occupants. Your own homeowner’s or renter’s insurance may cover property damage and temporary living expenses. And uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage on your own auto policy may provide additional protection if the at-fault driver lacks adequate insurance.

Sorting through these layers of coverage is exactly the type of work an experienced personal injury attorney handles every day.

Find out what your case is worth. Call Varghese Summersett for a free consultation.

We've Got This. Get Started

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

At Varghese Summersett, we approach every personal injury case with the preparation and intensity of a team that is ready to go to trial. We don’t file claims and hope for the best. We investigate thoroughly, identify every liable party, retain the right experts, and fight for every dollar our clients deserve.

Our personal injury team has recovered millions of dollars for injured Texans. We handle cases on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing upfront and owe us nothing unless we win your case. With more than 70 legal professionals across four Texas offices, we have the resources and the tenacity to take on insurance companies, corporations, and government entities.

If a vehicle crashed into your home, your workplace, or a building you were in, you deserve a legal team that understands the complexity of these cases.

Award-Winning Legal Excellence

360 West Magazine Top Attorneys 2025
Dallas Observer Best of Dallas 2025
ALM Texas Watch List
ALM Texas Legal Award 2024
Avvo Superb Rating
BBB A+ Rating
Best Law Firms 2025
NACDA Top 10
Best Lawyers 2026
Best Lawyers Ones to Watch 2025
Southlake Style Readers Choice 2025
Southlake Style Top Lawyers 2025
Texas Bar Foundation Fellow
Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers
Fort Worth Magazine Top Lawyers 2025
360 West Magazine Top Attorneys 2025
Dallas Observer Best of Dallas 2025
ALM Texas Watch List
ALM Texas Legal Award 2024
Avvo Superb Rating
BBB A+ Rating
Best Law Firms 2025
NACDA Top 10
Best Lawyers 2026
Best Lawyers Ones to Watch 2025
Southlake Style Readers Choice 2025
Southlake Style Top Lawyers 2025
Texas Bar Foundation Fellow
Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers
Fort Worth Magazine Top Lawyers 2025

Ask Varghese Summersett AI

Versus-AI has been taught everything from our website and is here to help you find the answers you need. Ask Versus-AI anything.

Watch: 3 Things You Should Never Say After a Crash

Frequently Asked Questions About Vehicle-Into-Building Crashes

Can I sue the property owner if a car crashed into a building I was in?

Yes, in some cases. If the property owner knew or should have known the building was vulnerable to vehicle strikes (due to prior incidents, location near a high-speed road, or proximity to a dangerous intersection) and failed to install protective barriers like bollards or guardrails, they may share liability for your injuries under Texas premises liability law.

What if the driver who hit the building was working at the time?

If the driver was acting in the course and scope of their employment, their employer may be vicariously liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. This is significant because commercial insurance policies typically carry much higher coverage limits than personal auto policies, which means more resources to compensate you.

How long do I have to file a lawsuit after a vehicle crashes into my home in Texas?

Under the Texas statute of limitations, you generally have two years from the date of the incident to file a personal injury lawsuit. Claims against government entities have shorter deadlines and strict notice requirements under the Texas Tort Claims Act. Contact an attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights.

What if the at-fault driver doesn’t have enough insurance to cover my damages?

Multiple insurance policies may apply, including the driver’s personal coverage, a commercial policy if the driver was working, the property owner’s liability insurance, and your own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage. An attorney can identify all available sources of compensation and pursue claims against every responsible party.

Can I recover damages if I was partially at fault?

Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. You can still recover damages as long as you are no more than 50 percent at fault. Your award will be reduced by your percentage of responsibility. If you are found more than 50 percent at fault, you cannot recover anything.

Don't Settle for Less

Texas Personal Injury Practice Areas

Our Texas injury lawyers fight for maximum compensation

Varghese Summersett

If your child was taken into custody or received a summons, their first juvenile court appearance in Texas is typically a detention hearing held within two working days of detention. During this hearing, a judge will decide whether to release your child or keep them detained while the case moves forward. Understanding the process, your child’s rights, and how to prepare can make a real difference in the outcome.

The Texas juvenile justice system is governed by Title 3 of the Texas Family Code . Unlike the adult criminal system, the juvenile system focuses on rehabilitation while still holding young people accountable. As a parent, you are not just a bystander. Texas law requires your active participation in these proceedings.

Varghese Summersett Legal Team

At Varghese Summersett, our juvenile defense team includes two attorneys who are Board Certified in Juvenile Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization: Lisa Herrick, a former Tarrant County prosecutor who tried more than 80 jury trials before becoming a defense attorney, and Mike Hanson, a military veteran and former prosecutor who leads our Houston office. With more than 70 team members across four Texas offices and a track record of more than 1,600 dismissals and 800 charge reductions, we bring the experience and resources families need during this stressful time.

You've Seen Us On

Southlake Style
NPR
Fort Worth Report
Court TV
CBS
WFAA
Today Show
PBS News
OxyGen
NBC News
KERA News
Fox News
ABC News
The Washington Post
The New York Times
Dallas Morning News
New York Post
Law and Crime
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Dallas Express
Daily Mail
Crime Online
Fort Worth Business Press
Fort Worth Inc. Magazine
Entrepreneur
D Magazine
Attorney at Law Magazine
Forbes
The Atlantic
Texas Monthly Magazine
Southlake Style
NPR
Fort Worth Report
Court TV
CBS
WFAA
Today Show
PBS News
OxyGen
NBC News
KERA News
Fox News
ABC News
The Washington Post
The New York Times
Dallas Morning News
New York Post
Law and Crime
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Dallas Express
Daily Mail
Crime Online
Fort Worth Business Press
Fort Worth Inc. Magazine
Entrepreneur
D Magazine
Attorney at Law Magazine
Forbes
The Atlantic
Texas Monthly Magazine

How Does the Juvenile Court System Differ from Adult Court in Texas?

How Does the Juvenile Court System Differ from Adult Court in Texas?

The juvenile system operates with different goals, terminology, and procedures than the adult criminal justice system. Knowing the language and framework will help you follow proceedings and communicate with your child’s attorney.

Key Terminology Differences

Adult System Term Juvenile System Term What It Means
Crime/Offense Delinquent Conduct or CINS The act the child is accused of committing
Arrest Taking Into Custody When a child is detained by law enforcement
Indictment Petition The formal charging document filed by the prosecutor
Defendant Respondent The child accused of the offense
Trial Adjudication Hearing The proceeding to determine if the child committed the conduct
Conviction Finding/Adjudication When the court finds the child engaged in the conduct
Sentencing Disposition Hearing When the court determines the consequences
Prison Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) The state facility for committed youth

Age and Jurisdiction

Texas juvenile courts have jurisdiction over children who are at least 10 years old but younger than 17 at the time of the alleged offense. This is younger than the threshold in most states. Once a child turns 17, they are treated as an adult in the Texas criminal justice system.

Juvenile courts retain jurisdiction over a case until the respondent turns 18 (or 19 in certain felony cases). For determinate sentence cases involving the most serious offenses, jurisdiction may extend until the person turns 40.

Are Juvenile Court Records Public?

Juvenile proceedings are generally closed to the public. Juvenile records are also subject to sealing and, in some cases, automatic restricted access. These protections reflect the understanding that children are still developing and should not carry the weight of a public record for mistakes made during adolescence.

There are exceptions. If a child is 14 or older and is accused of certain serious felonies, proceedings and records may be more accessible. An attorney can explain whether your child’s case falls under any exception.

What Happens Before the First Court Appearance?

What Happens Before the First Court Appearance?

Taking Into Custody

When a child is suspected of delinquent conduct, law enforcement may take the child into custody. This is the juvenile equivalent of an arrest, but it carries different rules. The officer must promptly notify the child’s parent, guardian, or custodian.

Under Section 52.01 of the Texas Family Code, the officer may release the child to a parent, bring the child to a juvenile processing office, transport the child to a medical facility if needed, or bring the child to a juvenile detention facility.

What Role Does the Juvenile Probation Department Play?

Before any case reaches a courtroom, the juvenile probation department plays a screening role. An intake officer reviews the case and decides how to proceed. The probation department has significant discretion at this stage.

Some cases are resolved resolved through a First Offender Program, deferred prosecution, or supervisory caution. If the alleged offense is serious, the child has prior referrals, or other factors warrant formal proceedings, the officer will refer the case to the prosecutor for the filing of a petition.

Not every juvenile referral results in a court appearance. First-time offenders accused of minor offenses may have the matter resolved without ever going to court.

How Is the Detention Decision Made?

If a child is not released after being taken into custody, they may be held in a juvenile detention facility. Under Texas law, a detention hearing must be held no later than the second working day after the child is placed in detention. This hearing is often the child’s first appearance before a juvenile court judge.

The court considers several factors: whether there is probable cause to believe the child engaged in the alleged conduct, whether continued detention is needed to protect the child or the community, whether the child is a flight risk, and whether the child has a suitable home environment.

Accused of a Crime? Every Second Counts

What Happens at the First Court Appearance?

The Detention Hearing

If your child has been detained, the detention hearing is the first formal proceeding. It typically happens within 48 hours of detention, excluding weekends and holidays.

The judge will consider whether probable cause exists and whether continued detention is warranted. The standard at this stage is not the same as trial. The state does not need to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Instead, the court looks at whether there are reasonable grounds to believe the child engaged in the conduct.

Your child’s attorney can argue for release by showing strong family ties, school enrollment, no danger to the community, and a suitable home environment. The attorney may also propose conditions of release such as electronic monitoring, curfew requirements, or regular check-ins with the probation department.

What If My Child Was Not Detained?

If your child was released after being taken into custody, the first court appearance comes later. After the prosecutor files a petition alleging delinquent conduct, the court will set an initial hearing date. You and your child will receive a summons to appear.

At this hearing, the court ensures both you and your child understand the allegations, that your child has legal representation, and that everyone knows their rights. The judge may also set future court dates and determine whether conditions should be imposed while the case is pending.

What Is the Courtroom Like?

Texas juvenile courtrooms are less formal than adult courtrooms, but they are still serious judicial proceedings. The judge sits at the bench, and the courtroom includes a prosecutor, your child’s defense attorney, a juvenile probation officer, and a court clerk. You will typically be seated in the gallery or at the counsel table with your child and attorney.

Juvenile cases in Texas are heard by a judge, not a jury, by default. However, your child does have the right to request a jury trial for the adjudication hearing under certain circumstances.

juvenile process

What Must the State Prove in a Juvenile Case?

The juvenile system uses the same constitutional standards of proof as the adult system, even though the terminology and proceedings differ.

To obtain an adjudication (the juvenile equivalent of a conviction), the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the child engaged in delinquent conduct. This means the prosecution must establish every element of the offense alleged in the petition. The child, as the respondent, has no burden to prove innocence.

The specific elements depend on the offense charged. For example, if the petition alleges assault under Texas Penal Code Section 22.01, the State must prove the respondent intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly caused bodily injury to another person. If the petition alleges a drug offense, the State must prove the elements under the relevant section of the Texas Health and Safety Code.

A defense attorney challenges the State’s case by attacking specific elements. If the prosecution cannot prove even one element beyond a reasonable doubt, the case should result in a “not true” finding (the juvenile equivalent of a not guilty verdict). Common defense strategies include challenging the identification of the respondent, questioning the legality of the search or seizure, disputing intent, and presenting alibi or self-defense evidence.

Talk to a Lawyer Before You Speak to Police. If your child has been accused of delinquent conduct, the decisions made early in the case often have the greatest impact. Call Varghese Summersett at (817) 203-2220 for a free consultation.

What Are My Child’s Rights in Juvenile Court?

What Are My Child’s Rights in Juvenile Court?

Children in Texas juvenile proceedings are entitled to many of the same constitutional protections as adults in criminal court.

Right to an Attorney

Your child has the right to be represented by an attorney at every stage. If you cannot afford one, the court will appoint one. Under Section 51.10 of the Family Code, a child may not waive the right to counsel unless the waiver is made in writing, in the presence of the parent, and after both the child and parent have consulted with an attorney.

Hiring an experienced juvenile defense attorney early can influence whether the case proceeds to court, whether your child is released from detention, and how the case is ultimately resolved.

Right to Remain Silent

Your child has the right to remain silent and cannot be forced to make statements that could be used against them. As a parent, one of the most valuable things you can do is advise your child to exercise this right. Well-meaning children often want to explain themselves to police, but those statements can be taken out of context. The safest approach is to decline to answer questions until an attorney is present.

Right to Confront Witnesses

Your child has the right to cross-examine witnesses who testify against them and to present their own witnesses and evidence. This ensures the State’s case is tested through the adversarial process.

Protection Against Self-Incrimination

Texas provides extra protections for juveniles regarding statements to law enforcement. Under Section 51.095 of the Family Code, a child’s statement during custodial interrogation is generally inadmissible unless it was recorded, the child was warned of their rights, and the child knowingly and voluntarily waived those rights. These protections are stronger than those in the adult system because children are more vulnerable to coercive interrogation.

Right to a Timely Hearing

If your child is detained, the adjudication hearing must generally take place within 10 working days. If the child is not detained, the timeline is more flexible, but the case should still proceed without unnecessary delay.

Don't Let This Moment Define Your Life

What Is My Role as a Parent in Juvenile Court?

Your involvement is not just welcome. It is required. Texas law mandates parental participation, and the court views your engagement as a key factor in your child’s rehabilitation.

Mandatory Attendance

Under Section 51.115 of the Texas Family Code, a court may order you to attend hearings. Failure to attend when ordered can result in contempt, which could mean fines or, in extreme situations, arrest. Your presence also signals to the judge that your child has a supportive home.

How to Support Your Child

Stay calm and reassuring. Your child takes emotional cues from you. If you are panicked or angry, their anxiety will increase.

Listen without judgment. Let your child express their feelings about the situation while being honest about its seriousness.

Follow your attorney’s guidance. They have experience with the juvenile system and will provide advice specific to your child’s case.

Prepare your child for court. Explain what will happen in age-appropriate terms. Let them know who will be in the courtroom and what behavior is expected. Have them dress neatly and conservatively.

Arrive early. Give yourself time to find the courtroom, meet with your attorney, and help your child settle in.

What Should You Avoid?

Do not discuss case details with anyone other than your attorney. Do not allow your child to speak with law enforcement or prosecutors without their attorney present. Do not coach your child on what to say in court. Do not display anger or frustration in the courtroom. Do not post about the case on social media.

What Are the Possible Outcomes of the First Hearing?

What Are the Possible Outcomes of the First Hearing?

Release from Detention with Conditions

If the first appearance is a detention hearing, the best outcome is release. The judge may order your child released to your custody with conditions such as electronic monitoring, a curfew, regular reporting to the probation department, school attendance requirements, or drug testing. Complying with these conditions is essential, as a violation could result in your child being returned to detention.

Continued Detention

In some cases, the judge may decide continued detention is necessary. This is more likely if the alleged offense is serious, the child has prior referrals, there are concerns about safety at home, or the child is considered a flight risk.

Setting Future Court Dates

Whether or not your child is detained, the first hearing will typically result in future court dates being scheduled. These may include pretrial hearings, status conferences, and ultimately the adjudication hearing.

Negotiated Resolutions

Many juvenile cases are resolved through negotiation. Your attorney and the prosecutor may discuss deferred prosecution, a plea to a lesser offense, or a disposition agreement that avoids the most serious consequences. Having an experienced attorney can make a significant difference in these negotiations.

What Are the Potential Dispositions in a Juvenile Case?

What Are the Potential Dispositions in a Juvenile Case?

While the disposition hearing comes after adjudication, understanding the range of possible outcomes early can inform your family’s defense strategy.

Probation

Probation is the most common disposition. The child remains in the community under supervision with conditions that may include community service, counseling, substance abuse treatment, restitution, academic requirements, and regular meetings with a probation officer.

Placement Outside the Home

For more serious offenses or when the home environment is a concern, the court may order placement in a residential treatment facility, boot camp, or foster care setting. This is typically reserved for cases where community-based probation has failed or the offense is too serious for standard probation.

Commitment to TJJD

The most serious disposition is commitment to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD). This is the juvenile equivalent of prison and is reserved for the most serious offenses or repeat offenders. The court must find that all other options have been considered and found inadequate.

Determinate Sentences

For certain serious offenses listed in Section 53.045 of the Family Code, the State may seek a determinate sentence of up to 40 years, with the possibility of transfer to adult prison when the child turns 19. These are the most serious cases handled in juvenile court.

What Is Certification to Adult Court?

What Is Certification to Adult Court?

One of the most serious possibilities is certification (discretionary transfer) to adult court. If your child is 14 or older and is accused of a felony, the State may petition to transfer the case.

Certification carries life-altering consequences. If certified, your child faces adult criminal penalties and a permanent criminal record. The certification hearing examines the seriousness of the offense, the child’s background, the likelihood of rehabilitation within the juvenile system, and the adequacy of the juvenile system’s resources.

If certification is a possibility in your child’s case, retaining an experienced juvenile defense attorney immediately is critical. These hearings require expert witness testimony and a thorough presentation of the child’s rehabilitation potential.

When Everything's on the Line. Call Us

A Case Result: How Aggressive Defense Changed the Outcome

In a recent Tarrant County case, Lisa Herrick represented a young person facing Aggravated Robbery charges, a first-degree felony that can carry up to life in prison for adults. Additional Evading Arrest charges compounded the situation. Through strategic advocacy, Herrick secured 18 months of probation, and the Evading Arrest charge was dismissed entirely.

This result reflects the kind of focused, aggressive defense that can redirect a young person’s life. Rather than years behind bars, this client received a rehabilitative outcome that kept them in the community.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Protect Your Rights and Your Record. Every juvenile case is unique, and early attorney involvement often shapes the final outcome. Call (817) 203-2220 for a free consultation with our juvenile defense team.

We've Got This

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

When your child faces juvenile charges in Texas, you need a firm that treats your family’s case with the seriousness it deserves. Varghese Summersett brings two Board Certified Juvenile Law attorneys, more than 70 team members, and four offices across Texas to every case.

From the first phone call, our team works to understand the full picture. We attend every hearing, communicate with the juvenile probation department, investigate the allegations, and develop a defense strategy tailored to your child’s circumstances. Whether the goal is dismissal, deferred prosecution, or the best possible disposition, we prepare every case as if it is going to trial.

Our firm has secured more than 1,600 dismissals and 800 charge reductions across all practice areas. We bring that same level of dedication to juvenile defense, because what happens in your child’s case today can shape the rest of their life.

Award-Winning Legal Excellence

360 West Magazine Top Attorneys 2025
Dallas Observer Best of Dallas 2025
ALM Texas Watch List
ALM Texas Legal Award 2024
Avvo Superb Rating
BBB A+ Rating
Best Law Firms 2025
NACDA Top 10
Best Lawyers 2026
Best Lawyers Ones to Watch 2025
Southlake Style Readers Choice 2025
Southlake Style Top Lawyers 2025
Texas Bar Foundation Fellow
Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers
Fort Worth Magazine Top Lawyers 2025
360 West Magazine Top Attorneys 2025
Dallas Observer Best of Dallas 2025
ALM Texas Watch List
ALM Texas Legal Award 2024
Avvo Superb Rating
BBB A+ Rating
Best Law Firms 2025
NACDA Top 10
Best Lawyers 2026
Best Lawyers Ones to Watch 2025
Southlake Style Readers Choice 2025
Southlake Style Top Lawyers 2025
Texas Bar Foundation Fellow
Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers
Fort Worth Magazine Top Lawyers 2025

Ask Varghese Summersett AI

Versus-AI has been taught everything from our website and is here to help you find the answers you need. Ask Versus-AI anything.

Watch: Inside Juvenile Detention in Texas

Frequently Asked Questions About Your Child’s First Court Appearance

Will my child have a criminal record after juvenile court?

Juvenile records in Texas are not the same as adult criminal records. In many cases, juvenile records can be sealed or may receive automatic restricted access. However, certain serious offenses may result in records that are harder to seal. An attorney can explain the specific implications for your child’s situation.

Can I be held financially responsible for my child’s case?

Yes. Texas law allows the juvenile court to hold parents responsible for restitution to victims, court costs, and fees for court-ordered services. In some cases, the court may also order parents to participate in counseling or parenting programs.

What if my child is accused of a school-related offense?

School-related offenses can trigger both the juvenile justice system and the school’s disciplinary process. Your child may face legal consequences and school-based consequences like suspension or expulsion simultaneously. It is important to address both tracks at the same time.

Can my child’s case be transferred to adult court?

If your child is 14 or older and accused of a felony, the State can petition for certification to adult court

Varghese Summersett

Suing Lyft or Uber for sexual assault in Texas is harder than in most other states. Texas law classifies rideshare drivers as independent contractors and explicitly states that Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) are not common carriers. These two legal shields create barriers that require survivors to prove “gross negligence” by clear and convincing evidence rather than ordinary negligence.

We Measure Our Success by Yours.

This does not mean lawsuits are impossible. Texas survivors can still pursue claims against Uber and Lyft, but the path requires a focused legal strategy targeting the company’s direct failures rather than simply holding them responsible for their driver’s actions.

Why Is Suing Uber or Lyft for Sexual Assault So Difficult in Texas?

Why Is Suing Uber or Lyft for Sexual Assault So Difficult in Texas?

Texas has created one of the most protective legal environments for rideshare companies in the country. Through a combination of state statutes and court rulings, survivors face unique obstacles that don’t exist in states like California or Illinois.

Three major legal barriers work together to shield Uber and Lyft from liability:

Independent Contractor Status: Under Texas Occupations Code Chapter 2402 , rideshare drivers are classified as independent contractors “for all purposes” if the company meets four specific criteria. This classification severs the traditional employer-employee relationship that would make companies responsible for their workers’ actions. In the 2025 Acosta v. Uber case, a Texas appeals court ruled this statute effectively blocks vicarious liability claims against Uber for driver conduct.

No Common Carrier Duty: In California, courts have ruled that Uber operates as a “common carrier” similar to airlines or trains, imposing the highest duty of care to protect passengers. Texas law explicitly rejects this theory. Texas Occupations Code § 2402.002 states that TNCs “are not common carriers, contract carriers, or motor carriers.” This closes the door to non-delegable duty claims that have succeeded in other jurisdictions.

The 2023 Gross Negligence Barrier: House Bill 1745, which took effect September 1, 2023, added Chapter 150E to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. This law prevents TNCs from being held vicariously liable unless the plaintiff proves gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence and shows the company failed to meet its background check obligations.

Don't Suffer In Silence

What Is the “Gross Negligence” Standard in Texas?

Gross negligence is a much higher bar than ordinary negligence. To succeed, a survivor must prove two things:

Objective Risk: The company’s action or inaction involved an extreme degree of risk, considering the probability and magnitude of potential harm.

Subjective Awareness: Uber or Lyft had actual, subjective knowledge of the risk but proceeded anyway with conscious indifference to the safety or welfare of passengers.

This standard means it’s not enough to argue that Uber “should have known” a driver was dangerous. Survivors must prove the company actually knew about specific risks (perhaps through prior assault reports about that driver) and deliberately chose to keep them on the platform. This evidence can be difficult to obtain without extensive discovery.

What Legal Theories Can Succeed in Texas?

What Legal Theories Can Succeed in Texas?

Despite these obstacles, Texas law does not grant rideshare companies total immunity. The strongest claims focus on the company’s own failures rather than the driver’s actions.

Negligent Hiring and Retention: This is often the most viable theory in Texas. If Uber or Lyft failed to conduct the background check required by state law or ignored specific “red flags” (such as a prior assault complaint against the driver), they can be held directly liable. The key is proving the company knew or should have known the driver posed a foreseeable danger.

Ratification: Texas law allows claims that a company “ratified” harmful conduct. This requires proving Uber or Lyft knew about a driver’s specific misconduct and chose to retain them or failed to take action. Simply keeping a driver after vague complaints is usually insufficient. The company must have shown an intentional act confirming the harmful behavior.

Fraud or Misrepresentation: Some survivors have pursued claims that Uber’s marketing (such as “Safe Ride Home” campaigns) constituted false representations they relied on when choosing to use the service. These claims require proving specific reliance on specific safety statements.

Product Liability: This theory argues the rideshare app itself is a defective product due to missing safety features like biometric identity verification. Texas courts apply a “predominant purpose” test. If the court views the app primarily as a service rather than a product, these claims may fail.

If you’ve been sexually assaulted during a rideshare, an experienced rideshare accident attorney can evaluate which theories apply to your situation. Schedule a free consultation to discuss your options.

How Does the Federal MDL Affect Texas Cases?

How Does the Federal MDL Affect Texas Cases?

Most rideshare sexual assault cases against Uber are currently consolidated in Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) No. 3084 before Judge Charles Breyer in the Northern District of California.

Why Cases Move to Federal Court: Because Uber is incorporated in Delaware with headquarters in California, cases involving Texas plaintiffs seeking more than $75,000 can be removed to federal court based on diversity of citizenship.

MDL Rulings for Texas Plaintiffs: In August 2024, Judge Breyer issued mixed rulings. He dismissed common carrier and strict product liability claims for Texas plaintiffs specifically because of Texas statutes. However, he denied the motion to dismiss gross negligence and punitive damages claims. He ruled that allegations of Uber’s systemic failure to address sexual assault could plausibly meet Texas’s gross negligence standard at the pleading stage.

This makes federal court potentially more favorable for surviving initial dismissal than Texas state court, where the Acosta precedent strongly reinforces the independent contractor shield.

Get the Compensation You Deserve

What Damages Can Sexual Assault Survivors Recover?

Texas personal injury law allows survivors to seek compensation for both economic and non-economic losses:

Economic Damages: Medical expenses (physical and mental health treatment), counseling and therapy costs, lost wages and lost earning capacity, and related out-of-pocket expenses.

Non-Economic Damages: Pain and suffering, emotional distress, anxiety, depression, PTSD, loss of enjoyment of life, and damage to personal relationships.

Punitive Damages: If gross negligence is proven, Texas law permits exemplary (punitive) damages designed to punish the company and deter future misconduct. These can be substantial in cases involving patterns of corporate negligence.

The Clock Is Ticking. Call Now

What Is the Deadline to File a Rideshare Sexual Assault Lawsuit in Texas?

Texas has a two-year statute of limitations for most personal injury claims, including sexual assault. This means survivors generally have two years from the date of the assault to file a lawsuit. However, the civil statute of limitations for sexual abuse cases can be more complex depending on when the assault was discovered and other factors.

Missing this deadline typically bars recovery entirely. Given the complexity of rideshare litigation and the potential for cases to be consolidated in federal MDL proceedings, early consultation with an attorney is essential.

Watch: Filing Deadlines for Sexual Abuse Claims in Texas

Quick Reference: Liability Theories in Texas

Liability Theory Status in Texas Key Challenge
Vicarious Liability Blocked Drivers are independent contractors under Tex. Occ. Code § 2402.114
Common Carrier Liability Blocked Statute says TNCs are not common carriers
Negligent Hiring/Retention Viable Must prove company knew of or ignored specific red flags
Gross Negligence Viable (Difficult) Must prove actual awareness and conscious indifference
Fraud/Misrepresentation Viable (Narrow) Must prove specific reliance on specific safety claims

Why You Need an Experienced Attorney for Rideshare Assault Cases

Rideshare sexual assault cases in Texas require a law firm with the resources and experience to take on large corporations. At Varghese Summersett, our team includes more than 70 legal professionals across four Texas offices. Our attorneys have decades of combined experience handling complex personal injury cases against well-funded corporate defendants.

These cases require extensive discovery to uncover evidence of prior complaints, internal safety decisions, and patterns of corporate neglect. We have the resources to pursue the evidence needed to prove gross negligence and hold rideshare companies accountable.

If you or a loved one has been sexually assaulted during an Uber or Lyft ride, you deserve a legal team that understands the unique challenges of Texas law. Find out what your case is worth. Schedule a free consultation today.

Don't Settle for Less

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue Uber or Lyft if I was sexually assaulted by a driver in Texas?

Yes, but Texas law makes these cases more difficult than in other states. You can pursue claims based on negligent hiring, gross negligence, or fraud. An attorney can evaluate which theories apply to your specific situation.

Why can’t I just hold Uber responsible for what their driver did?

Texas law classifies rideshare drivers as independent contractors, not employees. This means companies generally aren’t automatically responsible for driver actions. Your case must focus on the company’s own failures, such as inadequate background checks or ignoring prior complaints.

What evidence do I need to prove gross negligence against Uber or Lyft?

You must show the company had actual knowledge of an extreme risk to passenger safety and proceeded with conscious indifference. Evidence might include prior assault reports about the same driver, internal safety studies the company ignored, or patterns of inadequate screening.

How long do I have to file a lawsuit after a rideshare sexual assault in Texas?

Texas generally has a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including sexual assault. The deadline can vary based on specific circumstances, so consult an attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights.

Should I file my case in state court or federal court?

This depends on your specific situation. Federal MDL proceedings have been more favorable for Texas plaintiffs at the pleading stage. An experienced rideshare assault attorney can advise you on the best venue for your case.

Texas Personal Injury Practice Areas

Our Texas injury lawyers fight for maximum compensation

Injured in Texas? Get a free consultation.

(817) 203-2220

Varghese Summersett

No. In most cases, it is not legal to put a GPS tracker on someone else’s car in Texas. Under Texas Penal Code § 16.06 , knowingly installing a tracking device on a motor vehicle owned or leased by another person without their consent is a Class A misdemeanor. This charge can result in up to one year in county jail and fines up to $4,000.

We Measure Our Success by Yours.

If you’re caught tracking your spouse’s vehicle during a divorce or custody dispute, the consequences extend far beyond criminal charges. What you thought might help your case could actually devastate it.

What the Law Actually Says

What the Law Actually Says

Texas Penal Code § 16.06 makes it a criminal offense to knowingly install an electronic or mechanical tracking device on a vehicle that you do not own or lease. The statute covers GPS units, Bluetooth trackers like AirTags, and any device capable of transmitting location data.

The offense applies when you install a tracker on someone else’s vehicle without their effective consent. Even if you share a home or a marriage with the vehicle’s owner, installing a hidden tracker on their car can still violate this law.

A Class A misdemeanor is the most serious type of misdemeanor in Texas. A conviction means:

  • Up to 1 year in the Tarrant County Jail or other county jail
  • A fine up to $4,000
  • A permanent criminal record
  • Potential restraining orders and protective orders

What About Jointly Owned Vehicles?

What About Jointly Owned Vehicles?

The law criminalizes installing a tracker on a vehicle “owned or leased by another person.” This creates ambiguity when the vehicle is jointly titled or purchased with community property funds during marriage.

Many Texas prosecutors have taken the position that tracking a vehicle primarily used by your spouse, particularly during a separation, can still result in charges. This is especially true when temporary court orders grant one spouse exclusive use of a specific vehicle. Those orders effectively eliminate any claim of “effective consent.” At least one federal court addressing the issue of jointly owned vehicles in the context of GPS trackers disagreed that an arrest for one spouse installing a GPS tracker on a jointly owned vehicle would give rise to a civil suit for malicious prosecution.

Even without explicit court orders, law enforcement and district attorneys frequently pursue charges against spouses who install trackers on the “family car” when the other spouse was the primary driver. The argument is straightforward: if you’re hiding a tracker, you know the other person wouldn’t consent to it.

The Stakes Are High. We Leave Nothing To Chance. Call Now

Defenses to Unlawful Installation of a Tracking Device

Texas law provides several affirmative defenses that can defeat this charge:

Consent. If the vehicle’s owner or lessee gave you permission to install the device, you have a complete defense. This consent should be documented in writing whenever possible.

Law enforcement cooperation. Installing a tracker while assisting law enforcement under proper authorization is a valid defense.

Court order. If a court specifically authorized the tracking, the installation is lawful.

Owner status. If you are the sole owner of the vehicle (title in your name only), tracking your own property is not a crime. However, this defense may not apply to vehicles purchased during marriage, which are presumed to be community property regardless of whose name appears on the title.

The defense attorneys at Varghese Summersett have handled cases where clients genuinely believed they had a right to monitor a jointly owned vehicle. Understanding the nuances of ownership, consent, and community property law is essential to building a viable defense. If you’re facing these charges, talk to a Fort Worth stalking and surveillance defense lawyer who can evaluate the specific facts of your situation.

Don't Let This Moment Define Your Life

Typical Bond Amounts for Tracking Device Charges

If you’re arrested for unlawful installation of a tracking device in Tarrant County, you should expect to post bond before being released from the Tarrant County Jail or Lon Evans Corrections Center.

Based on our analysis of recent Tarrant County bond data, the most common bond set for violations of Texas Penal Code § 16.06 is $1,000. The average bond for this offense runs slightly higher, around $2,000, because some cases involve additional charges or aggravating circumstances.

Bond amounts can increase significantly when tracking device charges are filed alongside stalking, violation of a protective order, or harassment charges. In cases involving documented patterns of surveillance or intimidation, bonds can reach $5,000 or more.

When Tracking Becomes Stalking

When Tracking Becomes Stalking

Installing a single tracking device is a Class A misdemeanor. But repeated tracking, combined with other conduct that causes fear or harassment, can elevate the offense to stalking under Texas Penal Code § 42.072.

Stalking is a third-degree felony punishable by 2 to 10 years in prison. It becomes a second-degree felony (2-20 years) if you have a prior stalking conviction or if you violated a court order while engaging in the conduct.

Prosecutors often charge both offenses together when they believe the tracking was part of a broader pattern. In Tarrant County, bond amounts for stalking charges average around $28,000, reflecting the serious nature of these allegations.

Our attorneys recently represented a client charged with stalking in Tarrant County. The case involved allegations of surveillance and unwanted contact. Through careful investigation and strategic advocacy, we secured a resolution of 3-year deferred adjudication, which gives our client the opportunity to have the charge dismissed upon successful completion of probation.

When Everything's on the Line. Call Now

The Family Law Consequences Can Be Worse Than Criminal Charges

Here’s what many people don’t realize until it’s too late: even if the criminal case results in a dismissal or light sentence, the family court consequences can be devastating.

Impact on Your Divorce Case

Texas is a no-fault divorce state. You don’t need to prove adultery to get divorced. But evidence of adultery can still affect property division and, in some cases, spousal maintenance.

The problem is that evidence obtained through illegal tracking is immediately suspect. Your spouse’s attorney will attack it on multiple grounds: the criminality of how it was obtained, the invasion of privacy, and any violations of standing orders that prohibited monitoring the other spouse.

Even if a judge allows some of the evidence, the bigger picture often works against the tracking spouse. You may have proof that your spouse visited someone’s apartment, but now you’ve also given them proof that you committed a crime to get it. Judges frequently view the tracking spouse as the greater wrongdoer.

Impact on Child Custody

Custody disputes turn on what’s in the “best interest of the child.” Texas courts evaluate factors like each parent’s emotional stability, ability to co-parent, and any history of family violence.

Covert GPS tracking of the other parent can be characterized as stalking, harassment, or controlling behavior. This cuts against you on multiple custody factors. Your ex’s attorney will argue that you’ve demonstrated:

  • Poor judgment
  • Inability to respect boundaries
  • Controlling or obsessive behavior
  • Potential for escalation

Several Texas family courts have used unauthorized tracking as grounds for restricting the tracking parent’s access to the children. Outcomes have included supervised visitation, restricted geographic radius, and custody arrangements favoring the non-tracking parent.

If you’re going through a divorce and concerned about your spouse’s behavior, there are legitimate ways to address those concerns through the family court system. You should explore those options with a family law attorney before taking any action that could backfire. Learn more about what to do if you suspect your spouse is cheating.

Don't Let This Moment Define Your Life

Protective Orders and Restraining Orders

Texas courts have become increasingly sensitive to surveillance and tracking in the domestic context. Recent legislative updates treat unauthorized GPS tracking as a form of family violence when directed at a current or former intimate partner, particularly when it’s part of a pattern of stalking or harassment.

If your spouse discovers a hidden tracker on their car, they can petition for a protective order citing both the Penal Code § 16.06 violation and the broader pattern of conduct. Protective orders can restrict your contact with your spouse and children, remove you from your home, and create additional criminal exposure if you violate them.

A violation of a protective order is a Class A misdemeanor for a first offense, but it becomes a third-degree felony if you have prior violations or commit the offense while on bond for a family violence offense.

What About Tracking Your Own Child?

What About Tracking Your Own Child?

The analysis changes when you’re tracking your minor child’s vehicle rather than your spouse’s. Texas law recognizes parental rights to monitor and supervise children, and most courts would not find a Penal Code § 16.06 violation when a parent tracks a car driven by their underage child.

However, complications arise when:

  • The vehicle is owned by the other parent
  • A custody order restricts your ability to monitor the child
  • The tracking is primarily aimed at monitoring the other parent’s activities

If you’re considering tracking a vehicle used by your child, review any existing custody orders carefully and discuss the situation with an attorney first.

Your Next Move Matters. Get Started

The Criminal Court Process for Tracking Device Charges

If you’re arrested for unlawful installation of a tracking device in Texas, here’s what to expect:

Arrest and booking. You’ll be taken to the county jail for processing. In Tarrant County, this typically means the Lon Evans Corrections Center or the Green Bay facility.

Bond and release. For a Class A misdemeanor, you’ll generally be able to post bond and be released within hours. As noted above, bonds typically range from $1,000 to $2,000 for standalone tracking charges.

Arraignment. You’ll appear in court to receive formal notice of the charges and enter an initial plea. In Tarrant County, misdemeanor cases are handled in the County Criminal Courts.

Pretrial proceedings. Your attorney will review the evidence, file any necessary motions, and begin negotiations with the prosecutor. Key issues often include whether consent existed, who actually owned the vehicle, and whether the tracking was part of a broader pattern.

Resolution. Cases may resolve through dismissal, plea agreement, or trial. The best outcomes often involve pretrial diversion programs or deferred adjudication, which can result in the charge being dismissed from your record.

Our attorneys have successfully defended clients facing tracking device charges, securing dismissals and reductions that protect their criminal records and their rights in related family law proceedings.

We've Got This. Get Started

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

Varghese Summersett is one of Texas’s premier criminal defense and family law firms, with offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake. Our team of more than 70 legal professionals includes former prosecutors, board-certified specialists, and attorneys with decades of trial experience.

We’ve secured more than 1,600 dismissals and 800 charge reductions for our clients. Our approach combines aggressive legal advocacy with a clear understanding of how criminal and family law cases intersect.

When you’re facing charges that could affect both your freedom and your family, you need attorneys who understand both sides of the courthouse. We coordinate defense strategies across criminal and family courts to protect all your interests, not just the case in front of one judge.

If you’ve been charged with unlawful installation of a tracking device, stalking, or related offenses, or if you’re concerned about how surveillance activities might affect your divorce or custody case, call us for a free consultation.

Take the First Step With a Free Consultation

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I put a GPS tracker on my spouse’s car if I suspect they’re cheating?

Generally, no. If the vehicle is solely titled in your spouse’s name, installing a tracker without their consent violates Texas Penal Code § 16.06 . Even on jointly titled vehicles, prosecutors have pursued charges when one spouse secretly tracks the other, particularly during separation or when court orders grant exclusive vehicle use. The potential benefit of catching evidence of adultery is typically far outweighed by the criminal exposure and damage to your custody case.

What’s the difference between a tracking device charge and a stalking charge?

Unlawful installation of a tracking device is a Class A misdemeanor covering the single act of installing surveillance equipment. Stalking under Texas Penal Code § 42.072 is a felony that requires a pattern of conduct causing the victim to fear for their safety or the safety of a family member. If prosecutors believe your tracking was part of a broader pattern of surveillance, harassment, or intimidation, they may charge both offenses. Stalking carries significantly higher penalties, including potential prison time.

Will my criminal case affect my divorce or custody case?

Yes, almost certainly. Evidence of criminal conduct involving surveillance, tracking, or harassment will be used against you in family court. Texas judges consider factors like emotional stability, respect for boundaries, and history of family violence when making custody determinations. A tracking device charge, even if it results in dismissal, can significantly harm your position in a custody dispute.

Can I track my teenager’s car?

Parents generally have the right to monitor their minor children, including tracking vehicles they drive. However, complications arise if the vehicle is owned by the other parent, if custody orders restrict monitoring, or if the tracking is really aimed at the other parent rather than the child. Review your custody order and consult an attorney before installing any tracking device.

What if I find a tracker on my car?

Document the device with photographs and preserve it as evidence. You may want to file a police report, particularly if you’re in a divorce or custody dispute. Depending on your circumstances, you may be able to seek a protective order against the person who installed it. Consult with both a criminal defense attorney and a family law attorney to understand your options.

Protect Your Rights and Your Record

A tracking device charge can seem minor on paper, but its consequences ripple through every aspect of your life. Criminal penalties, protective orders, and family court battles can compound quickly. The best defense starts early, before statements are made, before evidence is lost, and before the family court forms opinions based on incomplete information.

Varghese Summersett’s criminal defense and family law teams work together to protect clients facing these interconnected issues. We understand how prosecutors build these cases, how family courts react to surveillance allegations, and how to position you for the best possible outcome in both proceedings.

Call (817) 203-2220 to schedule a free consultation with a defense attorney who handles both criminal and family law matters.

Varghese Summersett

Winter weather crashes in Texas may represent a small percentage of total annual collisions, but they result in a disproportionately high number of fatalities and serious injuries. The catastrophic 133-vehicle pileup on I-35W in Fort Worth in February 2021, which killed six people and injured dozens more, demonstrated just how deadly Texas ice can be. If someone else’s negligence caused your accident, you have the right to pursue a claim.

We Measure Our Success by Yours.

If you were injured in a car accident caused by icy roads in Texas, you may be entitled to compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Texas law still requires drivers to exercise reasonable care even in winter conditions, and the at-fault driver can be held responsible for the crash. In some cases, government entities, road operators, or commercial trucking companies may also share liability.

Why Ice Accidents Are So Dangerous in Texas

Why Ice Accidents Are So Dangerous in Texas

Texas drivers face unique challenges during winter weather events. Unlike states in the northern U.S., Texas roads are not designed for ice, and most Texas drivers have limited experience handling frozen conditions. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation into the Fort Worth pileup revealed that catastrophic ice accidents are rarely caused by one factor alone. They result from a “perfect storm” of roadway physics, maintenance limitations, and driver behavior.

The dangers are amplified by several factors specific to Texas. Speed limits remain high even as conditions deteriorate. Many drivers attempt to maintain normal highway speeds despite ice and snow. And the state’s unpredictable weather means freezing conditions can develop suddenly, catching motorists off guard.

why Texas roads are so dangerous when there's ice

The Physics Behind Texas Ice Accidents

Understanding why ice forms where it does helps explain why these crashes are so devastating and who may be liable when they occur.

The Bridge Phenomenon: Why Elevated Roads Freeze First

Bridges, overpasses, and elevated ramps are the first roadways to freeze in Texas, often long before surface roads become dangerous. Unlike regular roads that are insulated by the earth beneath them, bridges lose heat from both the top and bottom surfaces. Cold air circulates above and below the structure, causing bridge temperatures to drop rapidly.

During the 2021 Fort Worth crash, the area had experienced 36 consecutive hours of below-freezing temperatures. The elevated toll lanes became a sheet of ice while other roads remained passable. A driver may travel confidently on a wet but unfrozen highway, only to lose control instantly upon hitting a bridge deck. This physical reality creates liability questions when road operators fail to adequately warn drivers or treat elevated surfaces.

Black Ice: The Invisible Killer

Black ice is a thin, transparent layer of ice that forms on roadways and allows the pavement color to show through. This makes it look like a simple wet patch or shadow rather than a deadly hazard. Video evidence from the I-35W crash showed the road surface appeared “shiny and reflective,” looking simply like wet pavement rather than a frozen sheet.

Black ice often forms at night or early morning when moisture from light rain, fog, or dew hits a road surface that has dropped below 32°F. Critically, it does not need to be raining heavily for ice to form. High humidity combined with freezing temperatures can cause ice to accumulate on bridges without significant precipitation. Drivers frequently have no visual warning until they have already lost traction.

The “Flash Freeze” Window

Timing is often fatal in ice accidents. In the Fort Worth incident, light mist and freezing rain began only minutes before the crash occurred. The precipitation started around 5:57 AM, and the first collision happened at approximately 6:00 AM. This creates a “flash freeze” scenario where a road that was safe moments ago suddenly becomes a skating rink.

This rapid onset of dangerous conditions raises serious questions about monitoring, warning systems, and the responsibility of road operators to close or restrict roadways when conditions deteriorate.

Your Next Move Matters. Get Started

Avoiding Icy Road Accidents in Texas: Modern Technology Can Save Lives

The Barrier Effect in Restricted Lanes

In restricted lanes such as managed toll lanes or construction zones, concrete barriers prevent vehicles from sliding off the road into a ditch. While this sounds like a safety feature, it actually creates a more dangerous situation during ice events. Sliding vehicles bounce off the barriers and back into the path of oncoming traffic, creating unavoidable obstacles that lead to massive pileups. The I-35W toll lanes had this exact configuration, contributing to the severity of the crash.

Don't Suffer In Silence

Who Can Be Held Liable for an Ice-Related Crash?

Texas follows a fault-based system for car accidents, meaning the person or entity that caused the collision is responsible for damages. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 33, victims can recover compensation as long as they are not more than 50% responsible for the accident. Several parties may be liable depending on the circumstances of your crash.

Other Drivers

Just because roads are icy does not excuse negligent driving. Texas law requires motorists to adjust their speed and driving behavior to match current conditions. A driver who fails to slow down, follows too closely, or loses control due to excessive speed can be held liable for resulting injuries.

“Speed too fast for conditions” is a common citation even when drivers are traveling below the posted limit. Data from the Fort Worth crash showed that just 15 minutes before the pileup, vehicles were traveling in the left lane at speeds exceeding 100 mph despite the freezing forecast. Even vehicles traveling 66 mph (under the 75 mph limit) could not stop once they hit the ice. On ice, stopping distances increase by a factor of three or more. At highway speeds, once a driver sees a stopped vehicle, it is often physically impossible to stop in time to avoid a collision.

Road Operators and Toll Authorities

The NTSB investigation into the Fort Worth crash identified significant failures by the road operator. These included inadequate monitoring of road conditions, failure to deploy environmental sensor technology, ineffective visual inspection protocols, and failure to close or restrict the roadway when conditions became dangerous.

Private toll road operators and public road authorities have a duty to maintain safe roadways. When they fail to adequately monitor conditions, warn motorists, or close dangerous road segments, they may be held liable for resulting injuries. The NTSB specifically cited the lack of Environmental Sensor Stations (ESS) on the crash segment. These sensors measure pavement temperature and grip factors in real-time. Without them, road operators were essentially guessing the condition of the road surface based on air temperature, which is often inaccurate.

Government Entities

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is responsible for treating highways during winter weather events. When government agencies fail to adequately prepare for foreseeable conditions, fail to warn motorists of hazards, or negligently treat roadways, they may be held liable under certain circumstances.

However, claims against government entities involve strict notice requirements and deadlines under the Texas Tort Claims Act. Government entities also have limited immunity for certain types of decisions. An experienced attorney can evaluate whether you have a viable claim based on the specific circumstances of your accident.

Commercial Trucking Companies

Commercial trucks pose particular dangers during winter weather. Tractor-trailers require significantly more stopping distance than passenger vehicles, and their size makes them prone to jackknifing on slick roads. Trucking companies have a duty to ensure their drivers are properly trained, their vehicles are maintained, and their routes are planned with weather in mind. When a truck accident occurs during icy conditions, the company may share responsibility.

how to survive the slide

Maintenance Failures That Cause Ice Accidents

Even when road crews are active, specific gaps in maintenance strategies contribute to accidents. Understanding these failures helps establish liability when crashes occur.

Pretreatment Limitations

Road crews often apply “pretreatment” (usually a brine of salt and water or Magnesium Chloride) days before a storm. In the Fort Worth crash, the road was treated 44 hours prior to the accident. However, pretreatment is only a temporary measure designed to prevent ice from bonding to the pavement. It does not guarantee traction, and its effectiveness diminishes over time or can be washed away by initial rain.

When road operators rely on pretreatment applied days earlier without adequate follow-up monitoring or reapplication, they may be negligent in maintaining safe roadways.

Visual Inspection Failures

Maintenance crews traditionally patrol roads to “spot check” for ice. However, visual inspections often fail to distinguish between water and black ice. In the Fort Worth case, crews drove through the crash zone roughly 45 minutes prior to the pileup and did not detect ice because the moisture had not yet frozen or was invisible to the naked eye.

The NTSB noted that some crews test for ice by briefly slamming their brakes to see if they slide, but this training is often inconsistent or insufficient to detect isolated patches of ice on a long stretch of highway. These inadequate inspection protocols can form the basis for negligence claims.

Failure to Deploy Sensor Technology

A major contributing factor cited by the NTSB was the lack of Environmental Sensor Stations on the specific roadway segment where the crash occurred. These sensors provide real-time data on pavement temperature and surface conditions. Without them, road operators cannot accurately assess when roads become dangerous.

The failure to install available safety technology, particularly on elevated roadways known to freeze faster than surface streets, may constitute negligence when that failure contributes to crashes.

If you or a loved one was injured in an ice-related crash, the experienced personal injury lawyers at Varghese Summersett can help you understand your options. Call (817) 203-2220 for a free consultation.

Types of Compensation Available After an Ice Accident

Types of Compensation Available After an Ice Accident

Victims of ice-related car accidents in Texas can pursue both economic and non-economic damages. The specific compensation available depends on the severity of your injuries and the impact on your life.

Economic Damages

Economic damages compensate you for financial losses that can be calculated with receipts, bills, and documentation. These include emergency room visits and hospital stays, surgeries and medical procedures, physical therapy and rehabilitation, prescription medications, medical equipment and assistive devices, lost wages during recovery, loss of future earning capacity, vehicle repair or replacement costs, and out-of-pocket expenses related to your injuries.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages address the intangible ways an accident affects your life. These include physical pain and suffering, emotional distress and mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement and scarring, loss of consortium (impact on relationships), and permanent disability or impairment. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 41, punitive damages may also be available in cases involving gross negligence or egregious conduct.

Wrongful Death Claims

When an ice accident results in death, surviving family members may pursue a wrongful death claim. Texas law allows spouses, children, and parents of the deceased to seek compensation for funeral and burial expenses, loss of financial support, loss of love, companionship, and guidance, and mental anguish and emotional suffering.

Get the Compensation You Deserve

How Texas Comparative Negligence Affects Your Claim

Texas uses a modified comparative negligence system, which means your compensation may be reduced if you share partial fault for the accident. For example, if you were speeding when you hit ice and collided with another vehicle that failed to yield, the jury might find you 30% at fault. Your total recovery would be reduced by that percentage.

The critical threshold is 51%. If you are found more than 50% responsible for the accident, you cannot recover any compensation under Texas law. Insurance companies understand this rule and often try to shift blame onto victims. They may argue you were driving too fast, following too closely, or failed to take appropriate precautions.

Evidence That Proves Liability

Proving liability in ice-related accidents requires thorough investigation. Evidence may include weather reports and road condition data from the National Weather Service, TxDOT treatment records and response timelines, toll road operator maintenance logs, Environmental Sensor Station data (if available), traffic camera and surveillance footage, witness statements, vehicle event data recorders (“black boxes”), accident reconstruction analysis, and 911 call records and first responder reports.

The sooner you begin building your case, the more evidence will be available. Road operators may overwrite surveillance footage, and electronic data can be lost if not preserved promptly.

normalcy bias on icy roads

Driver Behavior: How “Normalcy Bias” Causes Crashes

Texas drivers are habitually accustomed to high speeds and dry pavement, leading to dangerous behaviors when conditions change. Understanding these patterns helps establish fault when crashes occur.

Speeding Relative to Conditions

You do not have to break the speed limit to be driving dangerously. Posted speed limits are set for dry conditions. When roads are icy, “reasonable and prudent” speed is often significantly lower than the posted limit. Drivers who maintain highway speeds during winter weather warnings may be negligent even if they are technically within the speed limit.

The Cruise Control Danger

Using cruise control on slick surfaces is a major cause of loss-of-control accidents. Cruise control delays the driver’s recognition of traction loss and can cause the vehicle to accelerate when the wheels begin to slip. A driver using cruise control on icy roads who loses control and causes a collision may bear significant liability for the crash.

Following Too Closely

On dry pavement, a two-second following distance is considered safe. On ice, drivers need five to six seconds (or three times the normal distance) to stop safely. Drivers who tailgate during winter weather and rear-end stopped vehicles can be held fully liable for resulting injuries.

Common Injuries from Winter Weather Accidents

Common Injuries from Winter Weather Accidents

The high-speed nature of Texas highway crashes combined with icy conditions frequently results in severe injuries. Multi-vehicle pileups, which are common during winter weather events, can involve dozens of cars and result in catastrophic harm.

Traumatic Brain Injuries

The violent forces involved in ice-related collisions often cause traumatic brain injuries, ranging from concussions to severe TBI requiring lifelong care. Symptoms may not appear immediately, making it essential to seek medical attention after any winter weather crash.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Spinal cord injuries can result in partial or complete paralysis, fundamentally changing a victim’s life. The force of a crash on icy roads, particularly when a vehicle rolls over or is struck by a commercial truck, can cause devastating damage to the spine.

Broken Bones and Orthopedic Injuries

Fractures are extremely common in ice-related accidents. The impact of a collision can break arms, legs, ribs, pelvis, and facial bones. Many victims require multiple surgeries and extensive physical therapy to recover.

Internal Injuries

The blunt force trauma from a crash can damage internal organs, causing internal bleeding that may not be immediately apparent. Delayed symptoms are common with internal injuries, which is why prompt medical evaluation is critical.

Whiplash and Soft Tissue Injuries

Even lower-speed ice accidents can cause whiplash injuries and damage to muscles, ligaments, and tendons. While these injuries may seem minor initially, they can result in chronic pain and long-term limitations.

What to Do After an Ice-Related Car Accident

What to Do After an Ice-Related Car Accident

The steps you take immediately following an ice accident can significantly impact your ability to recover compensation. If you are physically able, take the following actions to protect yourself and your claim.

Prioritize Safety

If you are able to move and it is safe to do so, get to the side of the road away from traffic. Turn on your hazard lights and set out flares or reflective triangles if available. During winter weather events, the risk of secondary collisions is extremely high. If you cannot exit your vehicle safely, stay inside with your seatbelt fastened and call 911. If you slide off the road and become stranded, stay in your vehicle. Do not walk away in a storm.

Call 911 and Report the Accident

Always call law enforcement to report the accident, even if injuries seem minor. The police report will document the scene, weather conditions, and statements from those involved. This official record is valuable evidence for your claim.

Seek Medical Attention

Get evaluated by medical professionals as soon as possible. Some injuries, including traumatic brain injuries and internal bleeding, may not present obvious symptoms immediately. Prompt medical documentation also establishes a clear connection between the accident and your injuries.

Document the Scene

If you can do so safely, take photographs and video of the accident scene, vehicle damage, road conditions, and any visible injuries. Note the presence of ice, standing water, or other hazards. A road that looks “wet” but produces no spray from other vehicles’ tires is a classic sign of black ice. Get contact information from witnesses who saw the accident.

Be Careful What You Say

Avoid admitting fault or apologizing at the scene, as these statements can be used against you later. Stick to the facts when speaking with police. Do not provide recorded statements to insurance companies without consulting an attorney.

Contact a Personal Injury Attorney

Before accepting any settlement offer or signing any documents from an insurance company, speak with an experienced injury lawyer. Ice accident cases often involve complex liability questions, including potential claims against road operators, government entities, and multiple drivers.

Don't Settle for Less

Why Insurance Companies Fight Winter Weather Claims

Insurance adjusters know that ice-related accidents present unique challenges for victims. They exploit these complexities to minimize payouts or deny claims entirely.

Blaming the Weather

Insurers often argue that the weather was an “act of God” and that no one could have prevented the accident. While weather contributes to accidents, it does not excuse negligent driving. Drivers have a duty to adjust their behavior to conditions, and those who fail to do so can be held liable.

Shifting Blame to You

Insurance companies frequently try to argue that victims contributed to their own injuries by driving in bad weather, traveling too fast, or failing to maintain control. They understand that reducing your recovery by even a small percentage saves them money, and that finding you more than 50% at fault eliminates their obligation entirely.

Disputing the Severity of Injuries

Adjusters may claim your injuries existed before the accident, are not as serious as you claim, or do not require the treatment you received. They may request independent medical examinations with doctors who are known to minimize injuries.

Making Quick, Low Settlement Offers

Insurance companies often approach victims shortly after an accident with settlement offers that seem generous but are actually far below the true value of the claim. They count on victims being overwhelmed by medical bills and eager to resolve their claims quickly.

The personal injury team at Varghese Summersett has extensive experience fighting back against insurance company tactics. Our attorneys thoroughly investigate every case, consult with experts when necessary, and build strong claims designed to maximize recovery. With offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake, we represent injured Texans across the state.

The Claims Process and Timeline

The Claims Process and Timeline

Understanding what to expect after an ice accident helps you prepare for the road ahead. While every case is different, most personal injury claims follow a general timeline.

Initial Investigation

Your attorney will gather evidence, obtain police reports and medical records, interview witnesses, and consult with experts as needed. In ice accident cases, this may include obtaining weather data, road treatment records, and any available sensor data from the road operator. This phase may take several weeks to several months depending on the complexity of the case.

Medical Treatment and Maximum Medical Improvement

It is generally advisable to wait until you have completed treatment or reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) before settling your claim. Settling too early means you may not recover compensation for future medical needs that were not yet apparent.

Demand and Negotiation

Once your damages are fully documented, your attorney will send a demand letter to the insurance company outlining your injuries, treatment, and requested compensation. The insurance company will respond, and negotiations will follow. Many cases settle during this phase.

Filing a Lawsuit

If negotiations do not produce a fair settlement, your attorney may recommend filing a lawsuit. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003, personal injury claims must generally be filed within two years of the accident. Claims involving government entities have shorter deadlines and additional notice requirements.

Discovery and Litigation

After a lawsuit is filed, both sides exchange information through discovery. This process includes written questions (interrogatories), document requests, and depositions. Discovery can take several months to over a year in complex cases involving multiple defendants.

Trial or Settlement

Most cases settle before trial, but having an attorney who is prepared to go to court strengthens your negotiating position. If your case does go to trial, a jury will hear evidence and determine liability and damages.

Warning Signs Every Texas Driver Should Know

Based on NTSB findings and TxDOT research, drivers are most at risk in Texas when temperatures are near or below freezing (32°F) and any moisture (fog, mist, or rain) is present. Elevated structures like bridges and ramps will be icy even if surface streets are wet but safe. A road that looks “wet” but produces no spray from other vehicles’ tires is a classic indicator of black ice. And traveling at posted highway speeds during winter advisories is dangerous because “reasonable and prudent” speed on ice is often far below the posted limit.

If you recognize these conditions, slow down significantly, increase your following distance, and never use cruise control. If you lose control despite taking precautions because another driver was negligent or road conditions were not properly managed, you may have a claim.

Get Answers Today. Call Us

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue if I crashed on ice because the road was not treated?

Possibly. Government entities like TxDOT and private toll road operators have a duty to maintain safe roadways, but they also have various legal protections. The NTSB investigation into the Fort Worth pileup identified multiple failures by the road operator, including inadequate monitoring and failure to close the roadway. An experienced attorney can evaluate whether you have a viable claim based on the specific circumstances of your accident.

What if the other driver says the ice caused the accident, not their driving?

Weather conditions do not eliminate driver responsibility. Texas law requires drivers to adjust their speed and behavior to match current conditions. If another driver was speeding, following too closely, using cruise control on ice, or otherwise driving negligently when they lost control and hit you, they can still be held liable for your injuries.

How long do I have to file a claim after an ice-related accident?

In Texas, you generally have two years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit. However, claims against government entities have much shorter notice deadlines, sometimes as little as six months. It is important to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to ensure you do not miss any critical deadlines.

What if I was partially at fault for the accident?

You can still recover compensation as long as you were not more than 50% at fault. Your recovery will be reduced by your percentage of responsibility. For example, if you were 20% at fault and your damages totaled $100,000, you could recover $80,000.

Should I accept the insurance company’s settlement offer?

You should consult with an attorney before accepting any settlement offer. Insurance companies often make quick offers that are far below the true value of your claim. Once you accept a settlement, you cannot go back and ask for more money, even if your injuries turn out to be worse than initially expected.

We've Got This. Get Started

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

When you hire Varghese Summersett to handle your ice-related car accident claim, you get a team of dedicated professionals committed to fighting for your rights. Our firm has more than 70 team members across four Texas offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake, giving us the resources to handle complex cases involving multiple parties, serious injuries, and disputed liability.

We investigate every case thoroughly, consulting with accident reconstruction experts, medical professionals, meteorologists, and other specialists as needed. We obtain road operator maintenance records, weather data, and sensor information when available. We handle all communication with insurance companies so you can focus on your recovery. And we prepare every case as if it is going to trial, because that preparation strengthens our negotiating position and ensures we are ready if the insurance company refuses to offer fair compensation.

Our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis for personal injury cases, meaning you pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes, but our track record demonstrates our commitment to achieving the best possible results for those we represent.

Texas Personal Injury Practice Areas

Our Texas injury lawyers fight for maximum compensation

Varghese Summersett

The Legal Implications of “Are We Dating the Same Guy”

“Are We Dating the Same Guy” (AWDTSG) started as a way for women to vet potential dates. It has become something far more legally significant. With over 8 million members across more than 200 cities, these private Facebook groups and the standalone app have evolved into platforms where reputations are made and destroyed, marriages unravel, and lawsuits are born.

If you’re going through a divorce in Texas, involved in a custody dispute, considering posting about someone, or just discovered you’re the subject of a thread, you need to understand the legal landscape. What happens in these groups doesn’t stay in these groups. It ends up in courtrooms, affects custody decisions, triggers defamation lawsuits, and sometimes leads to criminal charges.

This guide covers every legal angle of AWDTSG from a Texas lawyer’s perspective: using it as evidence in your divorce, the defamation risks of posting, what to do if you’re posted about, and the criminal exposure that can arise from this platform.

What AWDTSG Is and How It Works

What AWDTSG Is and How It Works

AWDTSG is a network of private, city‑based Facebook groups—and a newer companion app—where women share information about men they are dating or considering. The first group launched in New York City in 2022 and quickly grew into hundreds of city‑specific communities across the United States and abroad.

What began with simple posts like “Is he actually single?” has evolved into a broader venue for sharing allegations and personal accounts about men’s behavior. Members often post photos or dating app screenshots alongside questions or warnings, prompting others to respond with their own experiences, including claims of cheating, emotional abuse, or other serious misconduct.

Multiple AWDTSG and AWDTSG‑style groups operate in Texas, including communities that cover the Dallas–Fort Worth metro area, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio and even small markets like San Angelo and Midland.

Some operate under the official AWDTSG umbrella, while others use names like “Is This The Same Guy?” with varying levels of moderation.

Texas AWDTSG Groups

Group Name Areas Covered Estimated Members Notes
Are We Dating The Same Guy? | Dallas / Fort Worth / DFW Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW Metroplex Tens of thousands Main official DFW group
Are We Dating The Same Guy? | DFW (Secondary) Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW Metroplex Thousands Secondary/backup DFW group
Is This The Same Guy? UNCENSORED – Dallas / Fort Worth / DFW Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW Metroplex Thousands Looser moderation; higher legal risk
Are We Dating The Same Guy Dallas, All Of Texas, New York, Atlanta & L.A. Dallas, Statewide Texas, Multi-city Tens of thousands Multi-city coverage
Is This The Same Guy? Houston, Austin & San Antonio Houston, Austin, San Antonio Tens of thousands Covers multiple major Texas metros
Are We Dating The Same Guy Austin TX Edition Austin 8,500+ Austin-specific group
Are We Dating The Same Guy? | SafeTea | San Angelo / Midland / TX San Angelo, Midland, West Texas Thousands West Texas coverage

Note: These are private groups. Member counts fluctuate and are estimates based on comparable markets. For reference, the New York group has over 136,000 members, and the Los Angeles group has approximately 52,000. The main AWDTSG network reports 8.1 million members across all groups worldwide.

The “uncensored” variants deserve special attention. These groups often have looser rules about what can be posted, including full names, employers, and detailed personal information. From a legal perspective, these groups present the highest risk for both posters and subjects because they’re more likely to cross the line into actionable defamation or harassment.

What Group Rules Don’t Tell You

Most AWDTSG groups require screening questions before you can join. Applicants typically confirm their gender, location, and intent, then agree not to share screenshots outside the group. But here’s what those rules don’t tell you: moderators check compliance with group guidelines, not factual accuracy.

This means false or exaggerated information can spread to thousands of people before anyone questions whether it’s true. The rules exist to protect the group from being shut down by Facebook, not to protect you from legal liability if you post something defamatory.

Finding Your Spouse on AWDTSG

Finding Your Spouse on AWDTSG: Evidence in Your Divorce

For many people, AWDTSG becomes relevant when they discover their spouse has been living a double life. Someone sends you a screenshot. Your spouse’s face is plastered across a Facebook group, with dozens of women sharing stories about dates, lies, and relationships that overlapped with your marriage. Or you discover your spouse is an active member of these groups, posting photos of men they’ve been seeing while still married to you.

This discovery can be a turning point in your divorce case. The posts, comments, and screenshots could become powerful evidence affecting property division, custody decisions, and your spouse’s credibility in court. But only if you handle it correctly.

Two Ways Your Spouse Appears

Being discussed by other women. This is often how betrayed spouses first learn the full extent of their partner’s infidelity. Women post photos asking, “Anyone know this guy?” and the responses reveal a pattern of dating, lying about being single, and carrying on relationships during your marriage. You might see screenshots of dating app profiles, text messages showing romantic conversations, multiple women confirming they dated your spouse during specific time periods, detailed accounts of lies about marital status, and photos from dates or trips you knew nothing about.

Actively posting in these groups. Sometimes the discovery goes the other way. Your spouse is a member, actively posting photos of men they’re dating or asking other women about potential matches. This shows they weren’t passively receiving attention but actively pursuing new relationships while married. Their posts reveal timelines, intentions, and sometimes direct admissions about the marriage.

Using AWDTSG Evidence for Property Division

Texas allows both no-fault and fault-based divorce. While many divorces proceed on no-fault grounds, proving fault can significantly impact property division. Under Texas Family Code § 6.003, adultery is grounds for divorce. More importantly, proven adultery can result in a disproportionate division of the marital estate in your favor.

Texas is a community property state, but judges have discretion to divide property in a way that is “just and right,” and fault is one factor they consider. AWDTSG posts can provide dated evidence of when affairs began, corroboration from multiple witnesses, documentation of money spent on dating and maintaining a double life, and proof that your spouse lied about being married.

Impact on Custody and Support

The best interest of the child is the primary consideration in Texas custody cases. A parent who maintained an elaborate double life demonstrated a pattern of deception that speaks to their character and judgment. Evidence that your spouse introduced children to dating partners or exposed them to instability matters. Courts want to know that the parent awarded conservatorship will make good decisions.

Adultery can also affect spousal maintenance determinations. If your spouse is seeking maintenance from you, evidence of their adultery may reduce or eliminate their eligibility.

How to Preserve This Evidence

The evidence you’re looking at could disappear at any moment. Posts get deleted, groups go private, and your spouse might scrub their online presence once they realize you know. Take screenshots of everything immediately: the post itself, all comments, the poster’s profile, the group name and member count, and any visible dates and times.

Use screen recording video that scrolls through entire threads to capture context. Note the exact date and time you captured the screenshots. If possible, have a witness present or have your attorney’s office document the evidence independently. Texas Rules of Evidence require authentication before social media evidence is admitted, so the more documentation you have about how and when you captured it, the stronger your position.

Don’t confront your spouse until you’ve preserved everything and consulted with your attorney. Once they know you’ve found this evidence, they may coordinate with others to remove content.

Strategic Use in Your Case

Having evidence and using it effectively are different things. Sometimes the most powerful use is in settlement negotiations. Your spouse may be highly motivated to settle favorably rather than have detailed testimony about their dating life become part of the public record.

AWDTSG evidence can also inform discovery questions. Your attorney might subpoena records, depose the women who posted about your spouse, or use the evidence to catch your spouse in lies during their deposition. If your spouse denies the affair under oath and you have AWDTSG documentation proving otherwise, their credibility on every issue in the case is damaged.

When Family Gets Complicated

Texas Defamation Law and AWDTSG

Texas defamation law applies to AWDTSG posts just like any other public statement. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 73, defamation occurs when someone publishes a false statement of fact about another person that damages their reputation. The key elements are falsity, publication, identification, fault, and harm.

When Posts Cross the Legal Line

A post becomes potentially actionable when it asserts or clearly implies specific, provably false facts. Saying someone “felt rude” on a date is opinion. Saying someone “beats his kids” or “knowingly spreads STDs” is a factual claim that can be proven true or false. The distinction matters enormously in court.

Certain categories of false statements are considered defamation “per se” under Texas law, meaning damages are presumed without requiring proof of specific harm. These include false accusations of criminal conduct, sexual misconduct, professional incompetence, and having a loathsome disease. AWDTSG posts frequently venture into this territory.

Posts are more likely actionable when they use identifying information like full names, photos, workplace details, or unique identifying characteristics. They’re also more dangerous when they reach a large audience, which is almost guaranteed in metro groups with tens of thousands of members. Evidence of recklessness or actual malice, such as text messages showing the poster knew claims were false, strengthens a defamation case considerably.

What’s Less Likely to Be Actionable

Pure opinion based on disclosed facts receives more protection. A post stating, “He told me he was single, but I later found his wife’s Facebook; in my opinion, he’s a liar” is structured as an opinion tied to specific facts the reader can evaluate. Vague statements without clear identification or statements limited to subjective value judgments (“I didn’t vibe with him”) are harder to sue over successfully.

Courts that have examined AWDTSG content have sometimes dismissed claims involving terms like “psycho” or descriptions of ghosting as non-actionable opinion. But repeated implications of serious misconduct, especially using loaded terms like “predator” or “abuser” without factual basis, can cross into actionable territory.

Real Litigation Over AWDTSG Posts

The legal risks aren’t hypothetical. In Los Angeles, a man sued multiple women for defamation, libel, and sex-based discrimination over AWDTSG posts, seeking approximately $2 million in damages. While one defendant prevailed on an anti-SLAPP motion, the case demonstrates how quickly posters can find themselves in expensive litigation.

In Illinois, a court dismissed claims against an AWDTSG group and its moderators, treating certain posts as opinion or non-actionable. But the court also warned that repeated implications of serious misconduct could cross the line. Courts are still working through how to apply traditional defamation principles to this new forum.

Thinking About Posting? Seven Questions to Ask First

If You’re Thinking About Posting: Seven Questions to Ask First

Before posting anything in an AWDTSG group, treat it like sworn testimony. The same facts can later support or undermine a divorce, custody, or defamation case. Ask yourself these questions:

Am I stating a verifiable fact or expressing an opinion? Texas defamation law requires a false statement of fact. Pure opinion (“I felt unsafe on our date”) is generally protected. But “He beats his kids” is a factual claim that can be proven true or false. If a judge could say “true or false” to what you’re writing, you’re in dangerous territory.

Do I actually know this is true, and can I prove it? Truth is a complete defense to defamation. If your claims are accurate and you can back them up with texts, photos, or witnesses, your legal risk drops dramatically. Repeating rumors or unverified information you heard from someone else can be viewed as negligent or reckless.

Am I accusing him of a crime or sexual misconduct? False accusations of criminal conduct or sexual misconduct are classic defamation per se categories. They allow recovery without specific proof of economic loss. Labeling someone a rapist, child molester, or domestic abuser without clear, supportable facts is exactly the type of content that triggers high-dollar lawsuits.

Can he be clearly identified from what I’m posting? Using names, workplace information, photos, or unique details makes it easy to prove the post is “about” that person, a required element in Texas defamation claims. The more identifying information you include, the stronger a potential plaintiff’s case becomes.

Could this hurt his job or business reputation? Texas defamation law pays particular attention to statements harming someone’s profession or business. In divorce and custody cases, attacks on the other parent’s reputation can directly affect earning capacity, support calculations, and standing in the community.

Am I in the middle of a divorce, custody, or protective order case? Social media posts are routine evidence in Texas family courts. False or vindictive posts can undermine your credibility, be framed as harassment or attempted parental alienation, and violate standing orders that restrict posting about the divorce or the other party.

Would I stand behind this on the witness stand? Assume the other side screenshots everything. If you wouldn’t repeat the story under oath in front of a judge, don’t publish it to thousands of strangers. Even if you’re never sued, walking back a dramatic story in deposition can devastate your credibility on every other contested issue in your case.

Helping People Through Life's Greatest Challenges

If You’re Posted About: Do You Have a Case?

Not every unflattering AWDTSG post gives you a lawsuit. Most don’t. Before you call a lawyer, understand what’s actually actionable under Texas defamation law.

What’s NOT Actionable

Being called a “liar,” “cheater,” “narcissist,” or “red flag” isn’t defamation. Neither is someone saying you ghosted them, wasted their time, or gave them bad vibes. These are opinions or vague characterizations that courts consistently refuse to treat as actionable statements of fact.

If someone posts your photo and says, “avoid this one, total player” or “he led me on for months,” you probably don’t have a case. It stings, but Texas courts require false statements of specific, verifiable facts—not hurt feelings or damaged pride.

What IS Potentially Actionable

You may have a viable defamation claim if someone posted false statements accusing you of:

Criminal conduct. False claims that you committed assault, domestic violence, rape, sexual assault, theft, fraud, drug dealing, or any other crime.

Sexual misconduct or predatory behavior. False accusations that you’re a rapist, predator, or child molester. False claims of revenge porn, sexual coercion, or non-consensual acts.

Having a communicable disease. False statements that you have HIV, herpes, or other STDs, particularly combined with claims you knowingly exposed partners.

Professional misconduct or incompetence. False claims about your job performance, professional ethics, or conduct that could get you fired or cost you business.

Specific criminal history. False claims that you have a criminal record, are a registered sex offender, or have been arrested for specific crimes.

You Also Need Damages

Even if someone made a provably false accusation, you need to show it actually harmed you. There are two paths:

Defamation per se. If the false statement accuses you of a crime, sexual misconduct, having a loathsome disease, or professional incompetence, Texas law presumes damages. You don’t have to prove specific financial loss—the nature of the accusation itself is considered inherently damaging.

Everything else requires proof of actual harm. If the false statement doesn’t fall into those categories, you must demonstrate real-world consequences: you lost your job, lost a client or business opportunity, lost a relationship, were denied housing, or suffered other measurable harm directly caused by the post. “I’m embarrassed” or “my friends saw it” isn’t enough.

The Bottom Line

Before you contact us, ask yourself two questions:

1. Did someone make a specific, false factual claim about me—not just call me names or share opinions?

2. Did it actually cost me something—a job, income, relationship, professional standing—OR was it an accusation of crime, sexual misconduct, disease, or professional wrongdoing (where damages are presumed)?

If you can’t answer yes to both, you don’t have a viable case. If you can, screenshot everything and call us.

When AWDTSG Activity Leads to Charges

The Criminal Side: When AWDTSG Activity Leads to Charges

Sometimes AWDTSG activity intersects with criminal law. Accusations in these groups can trigger investigations for stalking, harassment, or protective order violations. Conversely, aggressive posting behavior can result in criminal charges against the poster.

Harassment

Under Texas Penal Code § 42.07, harassment occurs when someone initiates communication with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another person. Coordinated campaigns to post about someone or encourage others to contact them could support harassment charges.

Stalking

Stalking under Texas Penal Code § 42.072 involves conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear bodily injury, death, or that an offense will be committed against them or their property. In one Tarrant County stalking case, we negotiated a plea to 3-year deferred adjudication with ankle monitor review after one year, avoiding the harsher consequences our client initially faced.

Protective Order Violations

Protective orders add another layer of complexity. Violating a protective order is a criminal offense, and repeated violations within a year can be charged as a felony. In our analysis of Tarrant County bond data, the average bond for violation of a protective order was $3,121, and violations occurring two or more times within 12 months averaged $52,894 in bond. These are serious charges with significant consequences.

How AWDTSG Posts Affect Other Family Law Issues

How AWDTSG Posts Affect Other Family Law Issues

Property Division

Texas is a community property state, and judges have discretion in dividing the marital estate. Evidence of bad behavior, including vindictive or defamatory social media activity, can influence how a judge views the “just and right” division of property. False accusations made publicly can also affect settlement negotiations, as the accused party may be more motivated to resolve the case quickly to stop the reputational damage.

Child Custody and Conservatorship

The best interest of the child is the primary consideration in Texas custody cases. A parent who makes false public accusations against the other parent demonstrates poor judgment and potentially parental alienation behavior. Posts that reveal information about children, expose them to conflict, or violate court orders can significantly impact custody decisions.

On the flip side, documented patterns of concerning behavior by the other parent, properly verified and presented, can support arguments for modified custody arrangements or supervised visitation.

Spousal Support and Child Support

False claims about a spouse’s income, employment, or professional reputation can affect child support and spousal maintenance calculations. If defamatory posts actually result in job loss or damaged earning capacity, that harm may be considered in calculating support obligations.

Protecting Yourself During Divorce

The safest approach during any family law proceeding is to avoid social media activity related to your case entirely. Don’t post about your spouse, your divorce, your custody situation, or the other party’s new relationships. Don’t join groups like AWDTSG while litigation is pending. And don’t respond to posts about you without legal guidance.

If you’re already a member of these groups, consider whether staying is worth the risk. Even comments or reactions to others’ posts can be used to show your mindset, judgment, or involvement in this type of community.

Document everything your spouse or co-parent posts, but do so quietly. Have a trusted friend or family member take screenshots if needed. Your attorney can advise on when and how to use this evidence strategically rather than reactively.

Many Texas family courts use standing orders that restrict what parties can post about each other or the litigation on social media. Violating these orders can result in sanctions, damage your credibility with the judge, or hurt your position in custody disputes. If you’re currently involved in any family law matter, assume that anything you post online could end up as an exhibit in your case.

New Chapters Start Here

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

Varghese Summersett handles complex family law matters throughout Texas from offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake. Our team of legal professionals includes attorneys experienced in both the family law and criminal law aspects of cases involving social media evidence, protective orders, and defamation claims.

When you face a situation involving AWDTSG or similar social media complications, we provide strategic assessment of your legal exposure and options, coordination between family law and criminal defense when both are implicated, aggressive protection of your reputation and parental rights, and practical guidance on documenting and preserving evidence.

Whether you’ve discovered your spouse on AWDTSG and need to leverage that evidence, you’re facing false accusations and need to protect your reputation, you want to understand the risks before posting, or you’re defending against criminal charges arising from protective order or harassment allegations, our attorneys have the experience to guide you through these complicated intersections of family law, civil liability, and criminal exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Can AWDTSG posts be used as evidence of adultery in my Texas divorce?

Yes. Posts showing your spouse was dating, maintaining romantic relationships, or lying about being married can support adultery claims under Texas Family Code § 6.003. This evidence must be properly preserved and authenticated, but social media posts are routinely admitted in Texas family courts. Proven adultery can result in a disproportionate property division in your favor.

What should I do immediately after discovering my spouse on AWDTSG?

Screenshot everything before it disappears, including posts, comments, the poster’s profile, and group information. Note the dates and times. Do not confront your spouse or tell anyone who might warn them. Contact a family law attorney before taking any action. The evidence could be powerful in your case, but only if preserved properly and used strategically.

Can I sue someone for posting about me in an AWDTSG group?

Potentially, yes. If the post contains false statements of fact (not just opinion), clearly identifies you, was made negligently or recklessly, and caused damage to your reputation, you may have a defamation claim under Texas law. Posts accusing you of crimes, sexual misconduct, or professional incompetence are particularly actionable. However, truth is a complete defense, and some statements may be protected as opinion.

Can I post about my cheating spouse in AWDTSG to warn other women?

This is legally risky during divorce proceedings. Even truthful posts can violate court standing orders, damage your credibility with the judge, or invite counter-claims. If you post false or exaggerated information, you could face defamation liability. The safest approach is letting your evidence work through proper legal channels rather than social media.

Will AWDTSG posts affect my divorce or custody case?

Very likely. Texas family courts routinely admit social media evidence. Posts by your spouse can show their judgment and credibility. Posts about you, true or false, can affect negotiations and your standing. Your own posts can be used against you. Many courts have standing orders restricting social media activity during litigation, and violations can result in sanctions.

What if my spouse posts false information about me in AWDTSG?

Document everything immediately with timestamped screenshots. False statements of fact may support defamation claims and can be used in your divorce to demonstrate your spouse’s bad faith, harassment, or poor judgment. Your attorney can pursue removal through platform reports, cease-and-desist letters, and potentially court orders limiting future posts.

Can posting in AWDTSG lead to criminal charges?

In some circumstances, yes. Repeated contact intended to harass could support harassment charges under Texas Penal Code § 42.07. Conduct causing fear of harm could lead to stalking charges. If your posts violate a protective order, you face criminal liability. Even if you don’t face criminal charges yourself, false accusations in posts could expose you to civil defamation liability.

When the Stakes are High, Leave Nothing to Chance.

Protect What Matters Most

Whether you’ve discovered your spouse on AWDTSG, you’re facing false accusations in these groups, you need guidance before posting, or you’re dealing with criminal allegations tied to social media activity, call Varghese Summersett at (817) 203-2220. Our experienced attorneys understand every legal angle of these platforms and can help you protect your rights, your reputation, and your future.

Varghese Summersett

The Legal Implications of “Are We Dating the Same Guy?”

“Are We Dating the Same Guy” (AWDTSG) started as a way for women to vet potential dates. It has become something far more legally significant. With over 8 million members across more than 200 cities, these private Facebook groups and the standalone app have evolved into platforms where reputations are made and destroyed, marriages unravel, and lawsuits are born.

If you’re going through a divorce in Texas, involved in a custody dispute, considering posting about someone, or just discovered you’re the subject of a thread, you need to understand the legal landscape. What happens in these groups doesn’t stay in these groups. It ends up in courtrooms, affects custody decisions, triggers defamation lawsuits, and sometimes leads to criminal charges.

This guide covers every legal angle of AWDTSG from a Texas lawyer’s perspective: using it as evidence in your divorce, the defamation risks of posting, what to do if you’re posted about, and the criminal exposure that can arise from this platform.

What AWDTSG Is and How It Works

What AWDTSG Is and How It Works

AWDTSG is a network of private, city‑based Facebook groups—and a newer companion app—where women share information about men they are dating or considering. The first group launched in New York City in 2022 and quickly grew into hundreds of city‑specific communities across the United States and abroad.

What began with simple posts like “Is he actually single?” has evolved into a broader venue for sharing allegations and personal accounts about men’s behavior. Members often post photos or dating app screenshots alongside questions or warnings, prompting others to respond with their own experiences, including claims of cheating, emotional abuse, or other serious misconduct.

Multiple AWDTSG and AWDTSG‑style groups operate in Texas, including communities that cover the Dallas–Fort Worth metro area, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio and even small markets like San Angelo and Midland.

Some operate under the official AWDTSG umbrella, while others use names like “Is This The Same Guy?” with varying levels of moderation.

Texas AWDTSG Groups

Group Name Areas Covered Estimated Members Notes
Are We Dating The Same Guy? | Dallas / Fort Worth / DFW Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW Metroplex Tens of thousands Main official DFW group
Are We Dating The Same Guy? | DFW (Secondary) Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW Metroplex Thousands Secondary/backup DFW group
Is This The Same Guy? UNCENSORED – Dallas / Fort Worth / DFW Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW Metroplex Thousands Looser moderation; higher legal risk
Are We Dating The Same Guy Dallas, All Of Texas, New York, Atlanta & L.A. Dallas, Statewide Texas, Multi-city Tens of thousands Multi-city coverage
Is This The Same Guy? Houston, Austin & San Antonio Houston, Austin, San Antonio Tens of thousands Covers multiple major Texas metros
Are We Dating The Same Guy Austin TX Edition Austin 8,500+ Austin-specific group
Are We Dating The Same Guy? | SafeTea | San Angelo / Midland / TX San Angelo, Midland, West Texas Thousands West Texas coverage

Note: These are private groups. Member counts fluctuate and are estimates based on comparable markets. For reference, the New York group has over 136,000 members, and the Los Angeles group has approximately 52,000. The main AWDTSG network reports 8.1 million members across all groups worldwide.

The “uncensored” variants deserve special attention. These groups often have looser rules about what can be posted, including full names, employers, and detailed personal information. From a legal perspective, these groups present the highest risk for both posters and subjects because they’re more likely to cross the line into actionable defamation or harassment.

What Group Rules Don’t Tell You

Most AWDTSG groups require screening questions before you can join. Applicants typically confirm their gender, location, and intent, then agree not to share screenshots outside the group. But here’s what those rules don’t tell you: moderators check compliance with group guidelines, not factual accuracy.

This means false or exaggerated information can spread to thousands of people before anyone questions whether it’s true. The rules exist to protect the group from being shut down by Facebook, not to protect you from legal liability if you post something defamatory.

Finding Your Spouse on AWDTSG

Finding Your Spouse on AWDTSG: Evidence in Your Divorce

For many people, AWDTSG becomes relevant when they discover their spouse has been living a double life. Someone sends you a screenshot. Your spouse’s face is plastered across a Facebook group, with dozens of women sharing stories about dates, lies, and relationships that overlapped with your marriage. Or you discover your spouse is an active member of these groups, posting photos of men they’ve been seeing while still married to you.

This discovery can be a turning point in your divorce case. The posts, comments, and screenshots could become powerful evidence affecting property division, custody decisions, and your spouse’s credibility in court. But only if you handle it correctly.

Two Ways Your Spouse Appears

Being discussed by other women. This is often how betrayed spouses first learn the full extent of their partner’s infidelity. Women post photos asking, “Anyone know this guy?” and the responses reveal a pattern of dating, lying about being single, and carrying on relationships during your marriage. You might see screenshots of dating app profiles, text messages showing romantic conversations, multiple women confirming they dated your spouse during specific time periods, detailed accounts of lies about marital status, and photos from dates or trips you knew nothing about.

Actively posting in these groups. Sometimes the discovery goes the other way. Your spouse is a member, actively posting photos of men they’re dating or asking other women about potential matches. This shows they weren’t passively receiving attention but actively pursuing new relationships while married. Their posts reveal timelines, intentions, and sometimes direct admissions about the marriage.

Using AWDTSG Evidence for Property Division

Texas allows both no-fault and fault-based divorce. While many divorces proceed on no-fault grounds, proving fault can significantly impact property division. Under Texas Family Code § 6.003, adultery is grounds for divorce. More importantly, proven adultery can result in a disproportionate division of the marital estate in your favor.

Texas is a community property state, but judges have discretion to divide property in a way that is “just and right,” and fault is one factor they consider. AWDTSG posts can provide dated evidence of when affairs began, corroboration from multiple witnesses, documentation of money spent on dating and maintaining a double life, and proof that your spouse lied about being married.

Impact on Custody and Support

The best interest of the child is the primary consideration in Texas custody cases. A parent who maintained an elaborate double life demonstrated a pattern of deception that speaks to their character and judgment. Evidence that your spouse introduced children to dating partners or exposed them to instability matters. Courts want to know that the parent awarded conservatorship will make good decisions.

Adultery can also affect spousal maintenance determinations. If your spouse is seeking maintenance from you, evidence of their adultery may reduce or eliminate their eligibility.

How to Preserve This Evidence

The evidence you’re looking at could disappear at any moment. Posts get deleted, groups go private, and your spouse might scrub their online presence once they realize you know. Take screenshots of everything immediately: the post itself, all comments, the poster’s profile, the group name and member count, and any visible dates and times.

Use screen recording video that scrolls through entire threads to capture context. Note the exact date and time you captured the screenshots. If possible, have a witness present or have your attorney’s office document the evidence independently. Texas Rules of Evidence require authentication before social media evidence is admitted, so the more documentation you have about how and when you captured it, the stronger your position.

Don’t confront your spouse until you’ve preserved everything and consulted with your attorney. Once they know you’ve found this evidence, they may coordinate with others to remove content.

Strategic Use in Your Case

Having evidence and using it effectively are different things. Sometimes the most powerful use is in settlement negotiations. Your spouse may be highly motivated to settle favorably rather than have detailed testimony about their dating life become part of the public record.

AWDTSG evidence can also inform discovery questions. Your attorney might subpoena records, depose the women who posted about your spouse, or use the evidence to catch your spouse in lies during their deposition. If your spouse denies the affair under oath and you have AWDTSG documentation proving otherwise, their credibility on every issue in the case is damaged.

When Family Gets Complicated

Texas Defamation Law and AWDTSG

Texas defamation law applies to AWDTSG posts just like any other public statement. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 73, defamation occurs when someone publishes a false statement of fact about another person that damages their reputation. The key elements are falsity, publication, identification, fault, and harm.

When Posts Cross the Legal Line

A post becomes potentially actionable when it asserts or clearly implies specific, provably false facts. Saying someone “felt rude” on a date is opinion. Saying someone “beats his kids” or “knowingly spreads STDs” is a factual claim that can be proven true or false. The distinction matters enormously in court.

Certain categories of false statements are considered defamation “per se” under Texas law, meaning damages are presumed without requiring proof of specific harm. These include false accusations of criminal conduct, sexual misconduct, professional incompetence, and having a loathsome disease. AWDTSG posts frequently venture into this territory.

Posts are more likely actionable when they use identifying information like full names, photos, workplace details, or unique identifying characteristics. They’re also more dangerous when they reach a large audience, which is almost guaranteed in metro groups with tens of thousands of members. Evidence of recklessness or actual malice, such as text messages showing the poster knew claims were false, strengthens a defamation case considerably.

What’s Less Likely to Be Actionable

Pure opinion based on disclosed facts receives more protection. A post stating, “He told me he was single, but I later found his wife’s Facebook; in my opinion, he’s a liar” is structured as an opinion tied to specific facts the reader can evaluate. Vague statements without clear identification or statements limited to subjective value judgments (“I didn’t vibe with him”) are harder to sue over successfully.

Courts that have examined AWDTSG content have sometimes dismissed claims involving terms like “psycho” or descriptions of ghosting as non-actionable opinion. But repeated implications of serious misconduct, especially using loaded terms like “predator” or “abuser” without factual basis, can cross into actionable territory.

Real Litigation Over AWDTSG Posts

The legal risks aren’t hypothetical. In Los Angeles, a man sued multiple women for defamation, libel, and sex-based discrimination over AWDTSG posts, seeking approximately $2 million in damages. While one defendant prevailed on an anti-SLAPP motion, the case demonstrates how quickly posters can find themselves in expensive litigation.

In Illinois, a court dismissed claims against an AWDTSG group and its moderators, treating certain posts as opinion or non-actionable. But the court also warned that repeated implications of serious misconduct could cross the line. Courts are still working through how to apply traditional defamation principles to this new forum.

Thinking About Posting? Seven Questions to Ask First

If You’re Thinking About Posting: Seven Questions to Ask First

Before posting anything in an AWDTSG group, treat it like sworn testimony. The same facts can later support or undermine a divorce, custody, or defamation case. Ask yourself these questions:

Am I stating a verifiable fact or expressing an opinion? Texas defamation law requires a false statement of fact. Pure opinion (“I felt unsafe on our date”) is generally protected. But “He beats his kids” is a factual claim that can be proven true or false. If a judge could say “true or false” to what you’re writing, you’re in dangerous territory.

Do I actually know this is true, and can I prove it? Truth is a complete defense to defamation. If your claims are accurate and you can back them up with texts, photos, or witnesses, your legal risk drops dramatically. Repeating rumors or unverified information you heard from someone else can be viewed as negligent or reckless.

Am I accusing him of a crime or sexual misconduct? False accusations of criminal conduct or sexual misconduct are classic defamation per se categories. They allow recovery without specific proof of economic loss. Labeling someone a rapist, child molester, or domestic abuser without clear, supportable facts is exactly the type of content that triggers high-dollar lawsuits.

Can he be clearly identified from what I’m posting? Using names, workplace information, photos, or unique details makes it easy to prove the post is “about” that person, a required element in Texas defamation claims. The more identifying information you include, the stronger a potential plaintiff’s case becomes.

Could this hurt his job or business reputation? Texas defamation law pays particular attention to statements harming someone’s profession or business. In divorce and custody cases, attacks on the other parent’s reputation can directly affect earning capacity, support calculations, and standing in the community.

Am I in the middle of a divorce, custody, or protective order case? Social media posts are routine evidence in Texas family courts. False or vindictive posts can undermine your credibility, be framed as harassment or attempted parental alienation, and violate standing orders that restrict posting about the divorce or the other party.

Would I stand behind this on the witness stand? Assume the other side screenshots everything. If you wouldn’t repeat the story under oath in front of a judge, don’t publish it to thousands of strangers. Even if you’re never sued, walking back a dramatic story in deposition can devastate your credibility on every other contested issue in your case.

Helping People Through Life's Greatest Challenges

If You’re Posted About: Do You Have a Case?

Not every unflattering AWDTSG post gives you a lawsuit. Most don’t. Before you call a lawyer, understand what’s actually actionable under Texas defamation law.

What’s NOT Actionable

Being called a “liar,” “cheater,” “narcissist,” or “red flag” isn’t defamation. Neither is someone saying you ghosted them, wasted their time, or gave them bad vibes. These are opinions or vague characterizations that courts consistently refuse to treat as actionable statements of fact.

If someone posts your photo and says, “avoid this one, total player” or “he led me on for months,” you probably don’t have a case. It stings, but Texas courts require false statements of specific, verifiable facts—not hurt feelings or damaged pride.

What IS Potentially Actionable

You may have a viable defamation claim if someone posted false statements accusing you of:

Criminal conduct. False claims that you committed assault, domestic violence, rape, sexual assault, theft, fraud, drug dealing, or any other crime.

Sexual misconduct or predatory behavior. False accusations that you’re a rapist, predator, or child molester. False claims of revenge porn, sexual coercion, or non-consensual acts.

Having a communicable disease. False statements that you have HIV, herpes, or other STDs, particularly combined with claims you knowingly exposed partners.

Professional misconduct or incompetence. False claims about your job performance, professional ethics, or conduct that could get you fired or cost you business.

Specific criminal history. False claims that you have a criminal record, are a registered sex offender, or have been arrested for specific crimes.

You Also Need Damages

Even if someone made a provably false accusation, you need to show it actually harmed you. There are two paths:

Defamation per se. If the false statement accuses you of a crime, sexual misconduct, having a loathsome disease, or professional incompetence, Texas law presumes damages. You don’t have to prove specific financial loss—the nature of the accusation itself is considered inherently damaging.

Everything else requires proof of actual harm. If the false statement doesn’t fall into those categories, you must demonstrate real-world consequences: you lost your job, lost a client or business opportunity, lost a relationship, were denied housing, or suffered other measurable harm directly caused by the post. “I’m embarrassed” or “my friends saw it” isn’t enough.

The Bottom Line

Before you contact us, ask yourself two questions:

1. Did someone make a specific, false factual claim about me—not just call me names or share opinions?

2. Did it actually cost me something—a job, income, relationship, professional standing—OR was it an accusation of crime, sexual misconduct, disease, or professional wrongdoing (where damages are presumed)?

If you can’t answer yes to both, you don’t have a viable case. If you can, screenshot everything and call us.

When AWDTSG Activity Leads to Charges

The Criminal Side: When AWDTSG Activity Leads to Charges

Sometimes AWDTSG activity intersects with criminal law. Accusations in these groups can trigger investigations for stalking, harassment, or protective order violations. Conversely, aggressive posting behavior can result in criminal charges against the poster.

Harassment

Under Texas Penal Code § 42.07, harassment occurs when someone initiates communication with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another person. Coordinated campaigns to post about someone or encourage others to contact them could support harassment charges.

Stalking

Stalking under Texas Penal Code § 42.072 involves conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear bodily injury, death, or that an offense will be committed against them or their property. In one Tarrant County stalking case, we negotiated a plea to 3-year deferred adjudication with ankle monitor review after one year, avoiding the harsher consequences our client initially faced.

Protective Order Violations

Protective orders add another layer of complexity. Violating a protective order is a criminal offense, and repeated violations within a year can be charged as a felony. In our analysis of Tarrant County bond data, the average bond for violation of a protective order was $3,121, and violations occurring two or more times within 12 months averaged $52,894 in bond. These are serious charges with significant consequences.

How AWDTSG Posts Affect Other Family Law Issues

How AWDTSG Posts Affect Other Family Law Issues

Property Division

Texas is a community property state, and judges have discretion in dividing the marital estate. Evidence of bad behavior, including vindictive or defamatory social media activity, can influence how a judge views the “just and right” division of property. False accusations made publicly can also affect settlement negotiations, as the accused party may be more motivated to resolve the case quickly to stop the reputational damage.

Child Custody and Conservatorship

The best interest of the child is the primary consideration in Texas custody cases. A parent who makes false public accusations against the other parent demonstrates poor judgment and potentially parental alienation behavior. Posts that reveal information about children, expose them to conflict, or violate court orders can significantly impact custody decisions.

On the flip side, documented patterns of concerning behavior by the other parent, properly verified and presented, can support arguments for modified custody arrangements or supervised visitation.

Spousal Support and Child Support

False claims about a spouse’s income, employment, or professional reputation can affect child support and spousal maintenance calculations. If defamatory posts actually result in job loss or damaged earning capacity, that harm may be considered in calculating support obligations.

Protecting Yourself During Divorce

The safest approach during any family law proceeding is to avoid social media activity related to your case entirely. Don’t post about your spouse, your divorce, your custody situation, or the other party’s new relationships. Don’t join groups like AWDTSG while litigation is pending. And don’t respond to posts about you without legal guidance.

If you’re already a member of these groups, consider whether staying is worth the risk. Even comments or reactions to others’ posts can be used to show your mindset, judgment, or involvement in this type of community.

Document everything your spouse or co-parent posts, but do so quietly. Have a trusted friend or family member take screenshots if needed. Your attorney can advise on when and how to use this evidence strategically rather than reactively.

Many Texas family courts use standing orders that restrict what parties can post about each other or the litigation on social media. Violating these orders can result in sanctions, damage your credibility with the judge, or hurt your position in custody disputes. If you’re currently involved in any family law matter, assume that anything you post online could end up as an exhibit in your case.

New Chapters Start Here

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

Varghese Summersett handles complex family law matters throughout Texas from offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake. Our team of legal professionals includes attorneys experienced in both the family law and criminal law aspects of cases involving social media evidence, protective orders, and defamation claims.

When you face a situation involving AWDTSG or similar social media complications, we provide strategic assessment of your legal exposure and options, coordination between family law and criminal defense when both are implicated, aggressive protection of your reputation and parental rights, and practical guidance on documenting and preserving evidence.

Whether you’ve discovered your spouse on AWDTSG and need to leverage that evidence, you’re facing false accusations and need to protect your reputation, you want to understand the risks before posting, or you’re defending against criminal charges arising from protective order or harassment allegations, our attorneys have the experience to guide you through these complicated intersections of family law, civil liability, and criminal exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Can AWDTSG posts be used as evidence of adultery in my Texas divorce?

Yes. Posts showing your spouse was dating, maintaining romantic relationships, or lying about being married can support adultery claims under Texas Family Code § 6.003. This evidence must be properly preserved and authenticated, but social media posts are routinely admitted in Texas family courts. Proven adultery can result in a disproportionate property division in your favor.

What should I do immediately after discovering my spouse on AWDTSG?

Screenshot everything before it disappears, including posts, comments, the poster’s profile, and group information. Note the dates and times. Do not confront your spouse or tell anyone who might warn them. Contact a family law attorney before taking any action. The evidence could be powerful in your case, but only if preserved properly and used strategically.

Can I sue someone for posting about me in an AWDTSG group?

Potentially, yes. If the post contains false statements of fact (not just opinion), clearly identifies you, was made negligently or recklessly, and caused damage to your reputation, you may have a defamation claim under Texas law. Posts accusing you of crimes, sexual misconduct, or professional incompetence are particularly actionable. However, truth is a complete defense, and some statements may be protected as opinion.

Can I post about my cheating spouse in AWDTSG to warn other women?

This is legally risky during divorce proceedings. Even truthful posts can violate court standing orders, damage your credibility with the judge, or invite counter-claims. If you post false or exaggerated information, you could face defamation liability. The safest approach is letting your evidence work through proper legal channels rather than social media.

Will AWDTSG posts affect my divorce or custody case?

Very likely. Texas family courts routinely admit social media evidence. Posts by your spouse can show their judgment and credibility. Posts about you, true or false, can affect negotiations and your standing. Your own posts can be used against you. Many courts have standing orders restricting social media activity during litigation, and violations can result in sanctions.

What if my spouse posts false information about me in AWDTSG?

Document everything immediately with timestamped screenshots. False statements of fact may support defamation claims and can be used in your divorce to demonstrate your spouse’s bad faith, harassment, or poor judgment. Your attorney can pursue removal through platform reports, cease-and-desist letters, and potentially court orders limiting future posts.

Can posting in AWDTSG lead to criminal charges?

In some circumstances, yes. Repeated contact intended to harass could support harassment charges under Texas Penal Code § 42.07. Conduct causing fear of harm could lead to stalking charges. If your posts violate a protective order, you face criminal liability. Even if you don’t face criminal charges yourself, false accusations in posts could expose you to civil defamation liability.

When the Stakes are High, Leave Nothing to Chance.

Protect What Matters Most

Whether you’ve discovered your spouse on AWDTSG, you’re facing false accusations in these groups, you need guidance before posting, or you’re dealing with criminal allegations tied to social media activity, call Varghese Summersett at (817) 203-2220. Our experienced attorneys understand every legal angle of these platforms and can help you protect your rights, your reputation, and your future.

Varghese Summersett

Reckless driving in Texas is a misdemeanor offense that carries potential jail time, fines, and a permanent criminal record. Under Texas Transportation Code § 545.401 , a person commits this offense by driving a vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property. If you’ve been charged, you need to understand what you’re facing and how to fight back.

Unlike a simple traffic ticket, reckless driving is a criminal charge. A conviction can follow you for years, affecting job opportunities, insurance rates, and even professional licenses. The good news? These charges can often be reduced or dismissed with the right defense strategy.

Reckless Driving in Texas Explained

What Counts as Reckless Driving in Texas?

Texas law defines reckless driving broadly, giving officers significant discretion when making arrests. The key element prosecutors must prove is that you drove with “willful or wanton disregard” for safety. This is more than simple carelessness or negligence. It requires showing you consciously disregarded a known risk.

Common behaviors that lead to reckless driving charges include excessive speeding (typically 25+ mph over the limit), weaving aggressively through traffic, racing on public roads, running multiple red lights or stop signs, and driving on sidewalks or shoulders to pass other vehicles. However, what one officer considers reckless, another might view as aggressive but not criminal. This subjectivity creates opportunities for an effective defense.

Reckless driving is often charged alongside other offenses. Officers may add evading arrest if you failed to stop immediately, or upgrade the charge if alcohol was involved. Understanding the full scope of what you’re facing is the first step toward building your defense.

Penalties for Reckless Driving

Penalties for Reckless Driving

Under Texas law, reckless driving is a Hybrid Class B misdemeanor. The potential consequences include up to 30 days in county jail, fines up to $200, and a permanent criminal record. While these statutory penalties may seem relatively mild compared to other criminal offenses, the collateral consequences often prove far more damaging. It is referred to as a hybrid offense because it does not have the typical punishment range for a Class B misdemeanor.

A reckless driving conviction will appear on both your criminal record and your driving record. Insurance companies typically raise rates significantly after a reckless driving conviction, often by 50% or more. Some employers, particularly those in transportation, logistics, or positions requiring driving, may refuse to hire someone with this offense on their record.

For commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders, the stakes are even higher. A reckless driving conviction in any vehicle can trigger CDL disqualification and jeopardize your livelihood. Similarly, professionals with licenses from state boards may face disciplinary action.

If you’re facing reckless driving charges, don’t wait to get legal help. Schedule a free consultation with our criminal defense team at (817) 203-2220 to discuss your options.

What to Expect for Bond

What to Expect for Bond

If you’re arrested for reckless driving in Texas, you’ll need to post bond to secure your release. In our analysis of over 52,000 bonds set in Tarrant County, we found that the most common bond for reckless driving under Texas Transportation Code § 545.401(b) was $500, with an average bond of approximately $975.

Several factors can affect your bond amount. If you have prior convictions, outstanding warrants, or were arrested alongside more serious charges, expect a higher bond. Conversely, a clean record and strong community ties typically result in lower bond amounts or even a personal recognizance (PR) bond in some jurisdictions.

Once released on bond, you’ll have conditions to follow. Violating these conditions can result in bond revocation and additional charges. An experienced attorney can help ensure you understand and comply with all requirements while preparing your defense.

Accused of a Crime? Every Second Counts.

Common Defenses to Reckless Driving

Reckless driving charges are highly defensible because the statute requires proving a specific mental state. Simply showing that you were driving fast or made an aggressive maneuver isn’t enough. Prosecutors must prove you acted with willful or wanton disregard for safety.

The most effective defenses often focus on challenging the officer’s characterization of your driving. Was there actually a risk to persons or property? Were road conditions, visibility, or traffic patterns different than what the officer assumed? Video evidence from dashcams, traffic cameras, or nearby businesses frequently tells a different story than the police report.

Other successful defense strategies include challenging the traffic stop itself. If the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to pull you over, any evidence gathered afterward may be inadmissible. Constitutional violations during the stop or arrest can provide grounds for dismissal.

Emergency circumstances can also provide a complete defense. If you were driving to a hospital due to a medical emergency or fleeing a dangerous situation, your actions may not meet the legal definition of recklessness. Context matters enormously in these cases.

Tough Cases Call For Tougher Lawyers

How Our Attorneys Have Handled Reckless Driving Cases

At Varghese Summersett, our criminal defense attorneys have secured numerous favorable outcomes in reckless driving cases across Texas. With over 1,600 dismissals and 800 charge reductions on our record, we know how to build effective defenses.

In one recent case, our client was charged with both reckless driving and unlawful carrying of a weapon. The combination of charges created serious exposure. Attorney Alex Thornton investigated the circumstances, challenged the evidence, and successfully obtained a complete dismissal of both charges.

In another case, our client faced reckless driving charges alongside allegations of displaying a fake license plate. Attorney Sheena Winkfield negotiated a resolution that resulted in community supervision rather than jail time, minimizing the impact on our client’s record and future.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes, but these examples illustrate how aggressive representation can make a significant difference. Every case has unique facts, and we tailor our approach accordingly.

The Stakes Are High. We Leave Nothing To Chance.

Reckless Driving vs. Related Charges

Understanding how reckless driving relates to other traffic offenses helps clarify what you’re facing. Racing on a highway under Texas Transportation Code § 545.420 is a separate Class B misdemeanor with similar penalties but focuses specifically on speed competitions. If someone is injured during a race, the charge elevates to a state jail felony.

Evading arrest with a vehicle is significantly more serious. Under Texas Penal Code § 38.04, evading in a vehicle is a state jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in state jail. This charge is often added when someone continues driving after an officer activates emergency lights.

When alcohol is involved, DWI charges will typically take priority over reckless driving. However, reckless driving is sometimes offered as a plea reduction in DWI cases. This can be advantageous because reckless driving doesn’t carry the same license suspension consequences or enhanced penalties for subsequent offenses that DWI does.

Protect your rights and your record. Talk to a criminal defense lawyer today by calling (817) 203-2220.

What Happens After a Reckless Driving Arrest

What Happens After a Reckless Driving Arrest

The criminal process for a misdemeanor like reckless driving typically begins with an arrest or citation. If arrested, you’ll be booked into county jail and must post bond for release. If issued a citation, you’ll receive a court date to appear.

At your first court appearance (arraignment), you’ll enter a plea. Pleading not guilty preserves all your options and allows time to build a defense. Your attorney can then review the evidence, including police reports, dashcam footage, witness statements, and any other materials the prosecution intends to use.

Many reckless driving cases resolve through negotiation before trial. Depending on the circumstances and your history, options may include dismissal, reduction to a non-criminal traffic offense, deferred adjudication (probation that results in dismissal if completed), or a plea to the charged offense with minimal penalties.

If your case goes to trial, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you drove with willful or wanton disregard for safety. This is a high standard, and juries often find the subjective nature of “recklessness” difficult to apply. Skilled trial attorneys know how to highlight these ambiguities.

Don't Let This Moment Define Your Life

Can Reckless Driving Be Expunged or Sealed?

Texas law provides pathways to clear certain criminal records, but eligibility depends on how your case resolves. If your reckless driving charge is dismissed or you’re found not guilty at trial, you may qualify for expunction. This process destroys all records of the arrest and prosecution as if it never happened.

If you receive deferred adjudication probation and successfully complete it, you may be eligible for an order of nondisclosure. This seals your record from most public access, though law enforcement and certain licensing agencies can still see it.

A conviction for reckless driving cannot be expunged or sealed under current Texas law. This makes avoiding a conviction critically important for your long-term future. Even a misdemeanor conviction stays on your record permanently unless the law changes.

Our team includes attorneys who handle both the criminal defense and subsequent record clearing. We approach every case with an eye toward the best possible long-term outcome.

We Measure Our Success by Yours.

Why Choose Varghese Summersett

Our criminal defense team brings unique qualifications to every case. With four Board Certified Criminal Law Specialists and six former prosecutors on staff, we understand how both sides approach these cases. This perspective helps us identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and leverage opportunities for favorable resolution.

We have offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake, with over 70 team members ready to fight for you. Our track record speaks to our effectiveness, but we know that past results don’t guarantee future outcomes. What we can guarantee is that you’ll receive aggressive, strategic representation from attorneys who genuinely care about protecting your future.

Don’t wait to get help. Call (817) 203-2220 for a free consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions About Reckless Driving in Texas

Is reckless driving a felony in Texas?

No, standard reckless driving under Texas Transportation Code § 545.401 is a Class B misdemeanor. However, if reckless driving causes serious bodily injury or death, prosecutors may file more serious charges such as criminally negligent homicide or manslaughter, which are felonies.

How many points does reckless driving add to my license?

Texas doesn’t use a traditional point system for driver’s licenses. However, a reckless driving conviction will appear on your driving record and can affect your insurance rates, your ability to maintain a CDL, and your eligibility for certain programs like deferred adjudication on future offenses.

Can reckless driving be reduced to a traffic ticket?

Yes, in many cases an experienced defense attorney can negotiate a reduction from criminal reckless driving to a non-criminal traffic violation. This avoids a criminal record while still resolving the case. The likelihood of obtaining a reduction depends on the specific facts, your prior record, and the policies of the prosecuting jurisdiction.

Will I go to jail for reckless driving?

Jail time is possible but not automatic. Many first-time reckless driving cases resolve with fines, probation, or deferred adjudication without any jail time. However, aggravating factors like prior convictions, extremely dangerous conduct, or causing property damage increase the likelihood of jail being imposed.

How long does reckless driving stay on my record?

A reckless driving conviction stays on your criminal record permanently in Texas unless you qualify for expunction or nondisclosure. It will also remain on your driving record maintained by the Texas Department of Public Safety, typically for three to five years for insurance purposes, though the conviction itself never fully disappears.

Take the First Step With a Free Consultation

Get Help With Your Reckless Driving Case

A reckless driving charge doesn’t have to derail your life. With experienced legal representation, many of these cases result in dismissals, reductions, or outcomes that protect your record and your future. The attorneys at Varghese Summersett have the skills, resources, and track record to give you the best possible chance at a favorable outcome.

We offer free consultations for criminal defense matters and have offices throughout Texas to serve you. Whether your case is in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, or anywhere else in the state, we’re ready to fight for you. Call (817) 203-2220 today to speak with a defense attorney about your reckless driving case.

Varghese Summersett

Bail bond amounts in Texas depend heavily on where you’re arrested. Our analysis of more than 238,000 bail bonds across five major Texas counties reveals that for the same offense, one county may set bond amounts several times higher than a neighboring county. Dallas County emerged as a outlier, with average bond amounts nearly five times higher than some neighboring jurisdictions.

The data, drawn from public bail dashboards in Bexar, Collin, Dallas, Fort Bend, and Harris counties, paints a picture of a fragmented bail system. While reporting variations exist in any dataset of this size, the patterns are too pronounced to dismiss as statistical noise.

How Much Does Bail Cost Across Texas Counties

How Much Does Bail Cost Across Texas Counties?

Among the five major metropolitan counties analyzed, average bail amounts ranged from $14,203 in Bexar County to $42,752 in Dallas County. That means a defendant in Dallas faces average bond amounts roughly three times higher than someone arrested in San Antonio for the same type of offense.

County Total Cases Average Bond Median Bond
Bexar 54,647 $14,203 $4,000
Collin 11,334 $14,977 $3,000
Dallas 64,136 $42,752 $2,500
Fort Bend 10,241 $16,165 $3,000
Harris 45,519 $15,733 $3,000

The stark difference between average and median in Dallas tells an important story. Dallas’s median bond was just $2,500, yet its average soared to $42,752. This gap indicates that while many defendants receive relatively low bonds, a significant number face extraordinarily high bond amounts that skew the average dramatically upward.

Why Is Dallas County an Outlier for Bail Amounts

Why Is Dallas County an Outlier for Bail Amounts?

Dallas County sets bail amounts dramatically higher than its neighbors. The average bond in Dallas was nearly three times higher than Harris County (Houston) and almost three times higher than Collin County (Plano, McKinney). This disparity exists despite similar crime types and comparable population densities across these metropolitan areas.

Our Dallas County bond data analysis of 64,136 cases from January through September 2025 reveals the scope of this discrepancy. The most common bond set in Dallas was just $500, yet extremely high bonds in serious cases pull the overall average to levels seen nowhere else in the state.

For defendants, this means the county of arrest matters as much as the nature of the charge. If you’re facing the same offense in Dallas versus Houston, you could be looking at a difference of tens of thousands of dollars to secure your release.

Accused of a Crime? Every Second Counts.

How Do Drug Offense Bail Amounts Compare?

Drug offenses represent the largest category of arrests leading to bond hearings across all counties studied. In Dallas County alone, 14,091 drug cases resulted in bond settings during the analysis period. The average bond for drug offenses in Dallas was $20,004, with $5,000 being the most commonly set amount.

Here’s how specific drug charges break down in Dallas County:

Drug Offense Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
Possession CS PG 1 under 1 gram 5,062 $14,034 $5,000
Possession CS PG 1 (1-4 grams) 1,701 $17,564 $5,000
Possession Marijuana under 2 oz 1,480 $862 $500
Possession CS PG 2 under 1 gram 959 $6,315 $1,000
Manufacturing/Delivery CS PG 1 (4-200g) 667 $71,843 $100,000
Possession CS PG 1 (4-200 grams) 618 $29,308 $10,000
Manufacturing/Delivery CS PG 1 (200-400g) 39 $94,256 $100,000
Manufacturing/Delivery CS PG 1 (400+ grams) 42 $205,357 $50,000

The most striking finding: even low-level drug possession charges in Dallas carry average bonds exceeding $14,000. For a state jail felony involving less than one gram of a controlled substance, $14,034 represents a significant barrier to pretrial freedom. Compare this to the $500 bonds commonly set for marijuana possession under two ounces, and the inconsistency within even a single county becomes apparent.

Drug-free zone enhancements add another layer. Possession of less than one gram in a drug-free zone averaged $12,357 in Dallas, with $5,000 being most common. For defendants arrested near schools or other protected areas, these enhancements can substantially increase bond requirements.

Typical DWI Bail Amounts in Texas

What Are Typical DWI Bail Amounts in Texas?

Unlike overall bond amounts where Dallas stands as a dramatic outlier, DWI bonds show more consistency across Texas counties. Fort Bend County averaged $4,999 across 1,174 DWI cases, while Collin County averaged $4,490. Dallas County averaged $4,933 across 6,396 DWI cases. The real disparity emerges with repeat offenders and felony-level intoxication offenses, where judicial discretion creates wider variation.

Here’s how Fort Bend County DWI bonds break down by offense type:

Fort Bend DWI Offense Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
First-Offense DWI 658 $2,476 $1,500
DWI BAC 0.15 or Higher 149 $4,760 $2,000
DWI Second Offense 139 $5,964 $3,000
DWI Third or More (Felony) 111 $18,959 $10,000
DWI with Open Container 78 $1,881 $2,000
DWI with Child Passenger 38 $10,553 $5,000

Comparing Fort Bend to Dallas reveals interesting patterns. First-offense DWI bonds are similar: $2,476 in Fort Bend versus $1,901 in Dallas. But felony DWI (third or more) shows more variation: $18,959 in Fort Bend compared to $23,755 in Dallas. For DWI with child passenger cases, Fort Bend averages $10,553 and Dallas averages $9,783.

In Dallas County, DWI bond amounts follow a clear escalation pattern based on offense severity:

DWI Offense Type Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
First-Offense DWI 3,597 $1,901 $500
DWI with Open Container 1,054 $1,811 $500
DWI BAC 0.15 or Higher 293 $2,492 $2,500
DWI Second Offense 766 $3,667 $2,500
DWI with Child Passenger 169 $9,783 $5,000
DWI Third or More (Felony) 436 $23,755 $25,000
Intoxication Manslaughter 25 $285,000 $100,000

The jump from second to third DWI is substantial. A second DWI averages $3,667, while a third or subsequent offense averages $23,755. For intoxication manslaughter cases, the average bond reaches $285,000, reflecting the severity of charges involving death.

If you’ve been arrested for DWI in Dallas County, understanding these ranges can help you prepare for the bond hearing. An experienced attorney can often argue for bond amounts at the lower end of these ranges based on your specific circumstances.

How Assault and Violence Charges Affect Bail

How Do Assault and Violence Charges Affect Bail?

Assault and violence charges represent the second-largest category in our Dallas County analysis, with 10,449 cases. The average bond for assault-related offenses was $28,621, though this varies dramatically based on the specific charge.

Assault Offense Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
Assault Bodily Injury (Family Member) 3,711 $2,837 $1,500
Assault Bodily Injury 1,035 $2,715 $1,000
Aggravated Assault with Deadly Weapon 1,951 $63,306 $25,000
Assault Family Member (Impeding Breath) 1,098 $27,175 $15,000
Assault Family Member (Prior Conviction) 483 $37,911 $25,000
Assault Peace Officer/Judge 263 $26,554 $25,000
Assault of Pregnant Person 223 $26,803 $10,000
Aggravated Assault (Serious Bodily Injury) 126 $53,359 $50,000
Intoxication Assault 54 $52,093 $10,000

Family violence cases show a particular pattern. A first-time assault causing bodily injury to a family member averages $2,837, but this escalates sharply with aggravating factors. Impeding breath or circulation raises the average to $27,175. A prior conviction pushes it to $37,911. These escalations reflect Texas law’s treatment of repeat family violence offenders and the enhanced penalties they face.

Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon carries an average bond of $63,306 in Dallas County. The most commonly set bond is $25,000, but complex cases involving serious injury can push bonds much higher.

Don't Let This Moment Define Your Life

What Are Theft and Property Crime Bail Amounts?

Theft and property crimes accounted for 8,193 cases in our Dallas County analysis. This category showed the highest average bond of any non-violent offense category at $154,859, though this figure is heavily skewed by high-value theft and robbery cases.

Theft/Property Offense Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
Theft $100-$750 1,885 $1,315 $500
Theft $750-$2,500 512 $3,814 $1,000
Theft $2,500-$30,000 668 $18,499 $10,000
Theft with 2+ Prior Convictions 1,017 $17,352 $5,000
Theft of Firearm 81 $15,562 $10,000
Theft $30,000-$150,000 229 $26,271 $10,000
Theft over $300,000 23 $92,652 $50,000
Burglary of Vehicle 382 $4,031 $1,000
Burglary of Habitation 388 $33,552 $25,000
Robbery 332 $339,512 $50,000
Aggravated Robbery 552 $111,943 $100,000

The data shows how prior convictions dramatically affect bond amounts. A theft between $100 and $750 averages just $1,315. But theft under $2,500 with two or more prior convictions averages $17,352. Texas law treats habitual offenders more severely, and bond amounts reflect this enhanced scrutiny.

Robbery cases show the most dramatic bond amounts in the property crime category. Standard robbery averages $339,512 in Dallas, while aggravated robbery averages $111,943. These figures reflect the violent nature of robbery charges and their classification as serious felonies under Texas Penal Code Chapter 29 .

How Weapons Charges Are Handled at Bond Hearings

How Are Weapons Charges Handled at Bond Hearings?

Weapons offenses accounted for 3,577 cases in Dallas County, with an average bond of $11,032. The most common charge was unlawful carrying of a weapon, which averaged $2,351 with $1,000 being the most frequently set bond.

Weapons Offense Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
Unlawful Carrying Weapon 1,972 $2,351 $1,000
Unlawful Possession Firearm by Felon 792 $27,735 $10,000
Discharge Firearm in Municipality 210 $2,790 $1,000
Unlawful Carry with Felony Conviction 96 $30,109 $10,000
Prohibited Weapon 95 $21,334 $5,000
Aggravated Kidnapping with Deadly Weapon 16 $210,625 $250,000

Felon in possession cases show significantly higher bonds. Unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon averages $27,735, while unlawful carry with a prior felony conviction averages $30,109. These enhanced bond amounts reflect the federal and state prohibitions on firearm possession by convicted felons and the seriousness with which prosecutors pursue these charges.

Murder and Homicide Bond Amounts

What Are Murder and Homicide Bond Amounts?

Murder and homicide charges represented 200 cases in the Dallas County dataset. These cases carry the highest bond amounts of any offense category, with average bonds exceeding $1.6 million.

Homicide Offense Cases Average Bond Most Common Bond
Murder 129 $1,384,302 $1,000,000
Manslaughter 35 $3,117,857 $500,000
Capital Murder (During Felony) 22 $1,640,909 $1,000,000
Capital Murder for Remuneration 5 $710,000 No Bond
Capital Murder of Child 10-15 3 $833,333 $1,000,000
Criminally Negligent Homicide 2 $22,500 $15,000

Under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 17, defendants charged with capital offenses may be denied bail entirely when the proof is evident. Several capital murder cases in our dataset showed no bond set at all, reflecting judicial determinations that the defendant should be held without bail pending trial.

Watch: Understanding Bail Bonds in Texas

What Factors Affect Bail Amounts in Texas?

Texas law gives judges significant discretion in setting bail. Under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, magistrates must consider the nature of the offense, the defendant’s ability to make bail, ties to the community, employment history, criminal record, and any potential danger to the community or victim.

Our data reveals several patterns in how these factors play out in Dallas County:

Prior Convictions Matter Significantly. Across virtually every offense category, prior convictions drive bond amounts substantially higher. A first-time assault averages $2,715, but assault with a prior family violence conviction averages $37,911. The same pattern holds for theft, drug offenses, and weapons charges.

Enhancement Factors Add Up. Drug-free zone enhancements, use of a deadly weapon, targeting vulnerable victims (children, elderly, pregnant women), and impeding breath in family violence cases all trigger higher bond amounts. These aren’t just legal technicalities. They represent real differences in how magistrates view the severity of alleged conduct.

Offense Level Tracks Bond Amounts. Dallas County data shows clear stratification by offense level. State jail felonies average around $4,100. Third-degree felonies average $9,100. Second-degree felonies average $23,800. First-degree felonies average $66,500. Capital felonies average over $1.1 million.

Time of Year Shows Variation. Dallas County bonds showed a 64.9% increase between the first and second half of 2025, from an average of $6,825 to $11,253. November showed the highest average bonds at $14,769, while July showed the lowest at $5,985. The reasons for this seasonal variation warrant further study.

Tough Cases Call For Tougher Lawyers

Can a Lawyer Help Reduce Your Bail Amount?

Yes. An attorney can file a motion to reduce bond and present arguments about your ties to the community, employment, family responsibilities, and ability to pay. Judges have authority to modify bail amounts based on changed circumstances or compelling arguments.

At Varghese Summersett, our criminal defense team has secured bond reductions for clients across Texas. We understand how different counties approach bail decisions and can tailor our strategy accordingly.

In Dallas County, our analysis identified magistrates with notably different approaches to bond setting. Average bonds ranged from around $5,200 to over $10,000 depending on the magistrate. Personal bond rates varied from under 10% to over 19%. Understanding these patterns can inform defense strategy.

Don’t assume the initial bond amount is final. An experienced Dallas criminal defense attorney can often secure a reduction that makes the difference between freedom and continued detention. Call us at (214) 903-4000 for a free consultation.

What This Data Means for Texas Defendants

What Does This Data Mean for Texas Defendants?

These findings reveal a system where pretrial freedom depends heavily on geography. For defendants in Dallas County, the numbers are particularly stark. Average bond amounts nearly three times higher than neighboring jurisdictions create real barriers to pretrial release.

For defendants, this underscores the importance of having an attorney who understands local practices. The right lawyer can advocate effectively within any county’s judicial culture and work to secure the most favorable conditions possible.

For the justice system as a whole, this data points to a need for greater standardization. When the county of arrest determines the price of pretrial freedom more than the nature of the alleged offense, fundamental questions of fairness arise.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions About Texas Bail Bonds

How is bail determined in Texas?

Texas magistrates consider the offense charged, criminal history, ties to the community, employment status, ability to pay, and potential danger to the public. However, as our data shows, local judicial practices vary significantly from county to county. Dallas County averages nearly three times higher than Harris County despite similar populations and crime types.

Can you get bail reduced in Texas?

Yes. Your attorney can file a motion for bond reduction and present evidence about your circumstances. Dallas County magistrates reduced bonds in hundreds of cases during our analysis period, with average reductions of over $2,000. An experienced attorney understands which arguments resonate with local judges.

Why are Dallas County bail amounts so high?

Dallas County’s average bail of $42,752 is nearly three times higher than neighboring counties. While specific reasons vary by case, the data suggests differences in local judicial practices rather than differences in offense types. The median bond in Dallas was only $2,500, indicating that extremely high bonds in serious cases pull the average upward.

What happens if you can’t afford bail in Texas?

Defendants who can’t post bail remain in custody until their case resolves. This can take months and often leads to job loss, housing instability, and family separation. Research consistently shows that detained defendants are more likely to plead guilty and receive harsher sentences than those who secure pretrial release.

Take the First Step With a Free Consultation

Get Help With Your Bail Bond

If you or someone you love has been arrested in Texas, the bond amount doesn’t have to be the final word. At Varghese Summersett, our team includes board-certified specialists in criminal law. We’ve secured more than 1,600 dismissals and 800 charge reductions for our clients.

We have offices in Dallas, Houston, and Southlake, giving us deep familiarity with bail practices across Texas’s major metropolitan counties. Whether you’re facing charges in Dallas, Harris, Fort Bend, Collin, or Bexar County, we can help you understand your options and fight for your freedom.

Protect your rights and your record. Call us today at (214) 903-4000 for a free consultation.

Varghese Summersett

I’ve reviewed thousands of DWI reports in my career. The “odor of alcoholic beverage” appears in nearly every DWI police report in Texas, but it tells officers almost nothing about whether you’re actually intoxicated. If you’ve been pulled over and the officer mentions smelling alcohol, you should understand exactly what this observation means for your case and what decisions you’ll need to make in the moments ahead. Those decisions, including whether to consent to field sobriety tests and breath or blood testing, can dramatically impact your defense.

At Varghese Summersett, our DWI lawyers have handled thousands of intoxication cases across Texas. We know how officers use the “odor of alcohol” to justify investigations, and we know how to challenge this evidence when it’s used improperly. The short answer is this: the smell of alcohol on your breath does not prove impairment. It only proves consumption, which is perfectly legal for adults over 21.

How Officers Use the Odor of Alcohol in DWI Investigations

How Officers Use the Odor of Alcohol in DWI Investigations

When a police officer pulls you over, they’re looking for clues that might expand the traffic stop into a DWI investigation. The “odor of alcohol” is one of the first things they document because it helps build the legal foundation for everything that follows. Under Texas Penal Code § 49.04 , DWI requires proof of intoxication, not merely proof that someone consumed alcohol. But officers know that documenting alcohol odor creates a paper trail that arguably sounds stronger than careful analysis proves.

Here’s what typically happens: After stopping your vehicle, the officer approaches your window and immediately notes whether they detect an alcohol odor, often noting it was “on breath” or “on person.” This observation goes straight into the report, often with subjective descriptors like “strong,” “moderate,” or “faint.” These terms have no scientific basis or standardized meaning. One officer’s “strong” might be another officer’s “moderate.” Yet this subjective observation becomes the first brick in the probable cause wall.

Why Alcohol Odor Doesn’t Prove Intoxication

Most people don’t realize that ethanol itself is nearly odorless. What people actually smell when they detect “alcohol on the breath” are congeners, the flavoring compounds and fermentation byproducts that give alcoholic beverages their distinctive tastes and smells. These include acetaldehyde, esters, fusel oils, hops, tannins, and grape compounds.

This chemistry creates several fundamental problems with using odor as evidence:

  • Odor doesn’t correlate with blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Someone who drank two glasses of red wine might produce a much stronger odor than someone who consumed six vodka sodas with a significantly higher BAC.
  • Odor doesn’t indicate quantity consumed. A single craft beer with heavy hops will produce more odor than multiple shots of neutral spirits like vodka.
  • Odor doesn’t indicate timing. Alcohol can linger on the breath for hours after drinking stops, or “mouth alcohol” from recent consumption can create strong odor when systemic BAC is still rising or negligible.

Texas courts have consistently held that the odor of alcohol alone is not sufficient for probable cause to arrest for DWI. It must be combined with other indicators of impairment. To put this another way: you can drink alcohol and drive legally in Texas. The offense is driving while intoxicated, not driving after drinking.

Accused of a Crime? Every Second Counts.

Can Officers Use Alcohol Odor to Justify Further Investigation?

Yes. While alcohol odor alone cannot support an arrest, it can contribute to “reasonable suspicion” that allows officers to expand a routine traffic stop into a DWI investigation. Once an officer claims to detect alcohol odor, they typically request that you exit the vehicle and perform standardized field sobriety tests (SFSTs). This is where your decisions become critically important.

The odor observation serves several strategic purposes for officers. It establishes the probable cause narrative because DWI report templates emphasize “indicia of intoxication” including odor, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and unsteady balance. Courts have long accepted odor as one factor supporting reasonable suspicion. It also sounds scientific and objective to juries, even though it’s highly subjective. Perhaps most importantly, it’s nearly impossible to refute. How do you disprove what someone claims to have smelled?

Should You Consent to Roadside Field Sobriety Tests

Should You Consent to Roadside Field Sobriety Tests?

In Texas, you have the right to refuse field sobriety tests. There is no legal penalty for refusing SFSTs on the roadside. While some argue that these tests are designed for failure, the more accurate statement is the tests can only be relied upon as designed if they are administered as designed. Enter the human element: in many cases officers for any number of reasons do not administer the tests correctly. Beyond that, officers never tell you the “clues” of intoxication they are looking for. You’re taking a test, and not quite sure what you being graded on.

Our recommendation: Politely decline field sobriety tests. You can say, “I’d prefer not to participate in any tests without speaking to an attorney first.” This statement is respectful but firm. The officer may still arrest you based on other observations, but you won’t have provided additional evidence against yourself.

Should You Consent to a Portable Breath Test (PBT) on the Roadside

Should You Consent to a Portable Breath Test (PBT) on the Roadside?

Absolutely not. The portable breath testing devices officers carry are not the same as the Intoxilyzer machines at the police station. PBT results are generally not admissible in court in Texas, but officers use them to help establish probable cause for arrest. These devices are less accurate and more prone to error than station-based breath testing equipment.

There’s no penalty for refusing a roadside PBT in Texas. You should politely decline. If the officer asks why, you can simply state that you’ve been advised not to take roadside breath tests.

If you’re facing DWI charges in Texas and have questions about the evidence against you, our attorneys can help. Talk to a lawyer before you speak to police. Call (817) 203-2220 for a free consultation.

What About Breath or Blood Testing at the Station

What About Breath or Blood Testing at the Station?

This is where many people get confused about their rights. Here’s the straightforward answer: Do not consent to chemical testing. Make the state get a warrant for your blood if they believe they have probable cause.

Under Texas Transportation Code Chapter 724, refusing to provide a breath or blood sample will result in an automatic Administrative License Revocation (ALR). Your license will be suspended for 180 days for a first refusal. However, this administrative penalty is often preferable to providing evidence that can be used to convict you.

Here’s why refusal is typically the better choice:

When you refuse, you force the state to obtain a search warrant for your blood. The warrant process creates additional opportunities for review and for procedural errors that can be challenged later. Most importantly, you’re not providing voluntary evidence against yourself.

Many people worry that refusing will look bad to a jury. In reality, experienced defense attorneys can explain to juries why someone might refuse testing without being guilty. You have constitutional rights, and exercising them is not evidence of guilt.

What Happens When You Refuse Testing

If you refuse a breath or blood test, the officer will likely:

  • Confiscate your driver’s license
  • Issue a notice of suspension
  • Apply for a blood search warrant from a magistrate
  • Transport you to a hospital or blood draw location for a forced blood draw (if the warrant is granted)

You should still refuse. Let the officer do their job and obtain a warrant. This creates a paper trail that your attorney can review for errors. Magistrates sometimes deny warrants. Warrants sometimes contain errors that make the resulting blood draw inadmissible. By refusing, you preserve every possible defense.

Don't Let This Moment Define Your Life

DWI Penalties in Texas

Understanding what you’re facing helps explain why protecting yourself during the investigation matters so much. DWI penalties escalate quickly with each offense and with aggravating factors.

First DWI (Class B Misdemeanor): 72 hours to 180 days in jail, up to $2,000 fine, license suspension up to one year.

DWI with BAC ≥ 0.15 (Class A Misdemeanor): Up to one year in jail, up to $4,000 fine, mandatory ignition interlock device.

Second DWI (Class A Misdemeanor): 30 days to one year in jail, up to $4,000 fine, license suspension up to two years.

Third DWI (Third-Degree Felony): 2 to 10 years in prison, up to $10,000 fine, license suspension up to two years.

DWI with Child Passenger (State Jail Felony): 180 days to 2 years in state jail, up to $10,000 fine.

Typical Bond Amounts for DWI in Tarrant County

Based on our analysis of over 6,000 DWI and intoxication cases in Tarrant County, here’s what you can expect for bond:

  • First DWI (Texas Penal Code § 49.04): Most bonds are set at $500, with an average around $950
  • DWI with BAC ≥ 0.15: Most bonds are set at $1,000, with an average around $1,470
  • Second DWI: Most bonds are set at $1,500, with an average around $1,800
  • Third DWI or More: Most bonds are set at $5,000, with an average around $14,200
  • DWI with Child Passenger: Most bonds are set at $1,500, with an average around $3,700

Bond amounts can vary significantly based on your criminal history, whether there was an accident, and other factors the magistrate considers.

How a DWI Defense Attorney Challenges Alcohol Odor Evidence

How a DWI Defense Attorney Challenges Alcohol Odor Evidence

The “odor of alcohol” is fertile ground for cross-examination. When we defend DWI cases, we systematically dismantle this evidence by getting officers to acknowledge what they cannot determine from smell alone.

Under questioning, most officers will admit they cannot determine BAC from odor. They cannot determine quantity consumed from odor. They cannot determine when the person last drank from odor. They received minimal or no training on the chemistry of alcohol odor. Different beverages produce different odor intensities. A person could have a strong odor and be under 0.08, or a faint odor and be over 0.08.

An effective cross-examination establishes that odor is merely a cue of consumption, not intoxication. We highlight that the report language (“strong odor,” “moderate odor”) is nothing more than a subjective description with no standardized scale behind it.

Case Example: DWI Reduced to Obstruction of Highway

Our attorneys recently represented a client in Tarrant County charged with DWI. The police report documented a “strong odor of alcoholic beverage” and bloodshot eyes. Through careful negotiation and challenge of the evidence, we secured a reduction to Obstruction of Highway with 12 months of deferred adjudication. This result meant no DWI conviction on our client’s record and eligibility for record sealing after successful completion of probation.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.

What to Do If You’re Stopped for DWI in Texas

What to Do If You’re Stopped for DWI in Texas

The moments after a traffic stop can determine the outcome of your case. Here’s what you should do:

Be polite and cooperative with basic requests. Provide your license, registration, and insurance. Exit the vehicle if asked. Don’t argue with the officer.

Exercise your right to remain silent. You don’t have to answer questions about where you’ve been, whether you’ve been drinking, or how much you’ve had. You can say, “I’d prefer not to answer questions without an attorney present.”

Refuse field sobriety tests. Politely decline. There’s no legal penalty for refusing SFSTs.

Refuse roadside breath tests. The portable devices officers carry are not admissible anyway. Don’t provide preliminary evidence.

Refuse breath or blood testing at the station. Make the state get a warrant. Yes, your license will be suspended, but you’ll preserve defenses.

Contact an attorney immediately. You have only 15 days to request an ALR hearing to challenge your license suspension.

If you’ve been arrested for DWI in Texas, don’t wait to get legal help. Our team has secured more than 1,600 dismissals and 800 charge reductions across criminal cases. Protect your rights and your record. Call (817) 203-2220 today.

The Stakes Are High. We Leave Nothing To Chance

The ALR Hearing: Protecting Your License

After a DWI arrest, you have 15 days to request an Administrative License Revocation (ALR) hearing. This hearing is separate from your criminal case and focuses solely on whether your license should be suspended. Many people don’t realize they have this right, and failing to request a hearing results in automatic suspension.

The ALR hearing provides several benefits. It allows your attorney to subpoena the arresting officer and question them under oath. It reveals evidence and potential weaknesses in the state’s case. It may result in keeping your driving privileges. And it creates a record that can be valuable for your criminal defense.

Learn more about what you should never do if stopped for DWI and how to defend against DWI charges in Texas.

Take the First Step With a Free Consultation

What to Expect From Varghese Summersett

When you hire Varghese Summersett, you get a team with extensive DWI defense experience. Our firm includes former prosecutors who understand how the other side builds their cases. We have board-certified criminal law specialists. We maintain offices in Fort Worth, Dallas, Houston, and Southlake, with a team of more than 70 professionals.

We examine every aspect of your case, from the initial traffic stop to the chemical testing procedures. We investigate whether the officer had reasonable suspicion for the stop, whether they properly administered any tests, whether the breath or blood testing equipment was properly maintained and calibrated, and whether your constitutional rights were violated at any point.

DWI cases are technical, and the details matter. The difference between a conviction and a dismissal often comes down to evidence that an inexperienced attorney might overlook.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be convicted of DWI if I refused all testing?

Yes, you can still be convicted based on other evidence, including the officer’s observations of your driving, your physical appearance, and your behavior. However, the state’s case is typically weaker without chemical test results. Refusal makes it harder for prosecutors to prove you were intoxicated beyond a reasonable doubt.

Does refusing testing always result in license suspension?

Yes, under Texas implied consent law, refusing a breath or blood test triggers an automatic 180-day license suspension for a first refusal (two years if you have prior DWI-related contacts). However, you can request an ALR hearing to challenge the suspension, and you may be eligible for an occupational license that allows you to drive for work and essential activities.

What if the officer forced a blood draw without my consent?

Officers can obtain a warrant authorizing a blood draw over your objection. If the warrant was properly obtained, the blood draw is generally legal. However, we carefully review every warrant for procedural errors, false statements, or constitutional violations that could make the results inadmissible.

How long does alcohol odor stay on your breath?

Alcohol can remain detectable on the breath for many hours after drinking, often 12 to 24 hours depending on the amount consumed. This means you can smell like alcohol when your BAC is low or even near zero. This is one reason alcohol odor is such weak evidence of current intoxication.

Can mouthwash or breath spray affect breath test results?

Yes. Alcohol-containing mouthwash, breath spray, and similar products can create a strong alcohol odor and even cause elevated breath test readings for roughly 10 to 20 minutes after use. This is called “mouth alcohol” and does not reflect your true blood alcohol level. Proper breath testing protocols require an observation period to avoid this problem, but officers don’t always follow these procedures correctly.

Get Help From an Experienced Texas DWI Lawyer

The odor of alcohol is largely scientific theater. When you see it in a police report, understand what it really means: the officer smelled something. That’s it. It doesn’t mean you were drunk, it doesn’t mean you were over the legal limit, and it doesn’t prove you’re guilty of DWI.

If you’ve been arrested for DWI in Texas, every piece of evidence in the police report deserves careful scrutiny by a defense attorney who understands the science and knows how to challenge it in court. The decisions you made during the investigation, and the decisions your attorney makes in the weeks ahead, will shape the outcome of your case.

Schedule a free consultation with Varghese Summersett today. Call (817) 203-2220 or contact us online to discuss your case with an experienced DWI defense attorney.

Talk to Our Texas DWI Lawyer

Contact Info

Varghese Summersett PLLC
32.7546869 -97.3337789
Varghese Summersett is a premier criminal defense firm based in Fort Worth, Texas. Our attorneys focus exclusively on criminal law and represent clients charged with crimes at both the state and federal level. We handle everything from DWI to capital murder to white collar crime. Collectively, our attorneys bring together more than 100 years of criminal law experience and have tried more than 550 cases before Texas juries. All of our senior attorneys served as former state or federal prosecutors and four are Board Certified in Criminal law, the highest designation an attorney can reach. We are the firm people turn to when the stakes are high and they are facing the biggest problem in their lives.
Address
300 Throckmorton Street, Suite 700
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Phone
817-203-2220

Contact Us

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Phone:
Your Message: